...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-22-2015, 03:21 PM
Smitty67 Smitty67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Paradise, Tx.
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default LS-3 Cam

Hey Guys,

I have an LS-3 that I'm preping to install in my 67 Camaro.. I have two cams available to me and I'm trying to determine if one of these will suit my goals.

Cam 1 - 227/235 639/646 on a 114lsa

Cam 2 - 227/239 612/612 on a 112+3

I've been doing a lot of reading to understand the specs and how it translates to drivability and power curve. I think either will work but not sure what the trade off's will be.

My setup is pretty standard, stock LS-3, CAI, mid-length headers, 6L80, Yank 2800 stall, and 3.91 gears out back.

Primary goal is for the car to be fun as hell to drive, occasional autocross and occasional drag.

Appreciate any thoughts or experiences here..

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-22-2015, 09:50 PM
Solid LT1 Solid LT1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I'd go with #2 based on lift specs. Unless you want to invest in some new rocker arms, the stock LS rockers don't work well with high lift cams....under 0.620 your good. If the motor is EFI, the 112 degree int/exh lobe separation is getting a little tight, hope you know a good tuner and if your running a stock LS3 intake....move the MAP sensor source to the rear of the intake plenum from its stock location. The stock LS3 MAP sensor location is too close to the throttle body and high overlap events are exaggerated by the throttle blade area. The LS3 also likes a bigger duration on the exhaust lobe.....#2!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-23-2015, 12:41 PM
Smitty67 Smitty67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Paradise, Tx.
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the feedback. Any concerns with stock springs? Do you recommend the trunion upgrade on the rockers?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-28-2015, 01:53 AM
71RS/SS396's Avatar
71RS/SS396 71RS/SS396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wake Forest,NC
Posts: 872
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty67 View Post
Thanks for the feedback. Any concerns with stock springs? Do you recommend the trunion upgrade on the rockers?
You definitely need to upgrade the valve springs to match the lift increase.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-28-2015, 08:08 AM
Chicken Louie's Avatar
Chicken Louie Chicken Louie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Calgary,Alberta
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

When I switched out my cam I went with the PAC beehives and the Comp 13702 Trunion Kit
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-31-2015, 05:43 PM
Later-A-Body Later-A-Body is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Your best choice is cam #1. The 114 LSA is going to give you much better driveability, and a broad powerband. The idle will still be noticeable even with the wider profile. LS motors do not require a lot of duration and tight LSA's to make great power. A lot of people make the mistake of overcamming these motors. Regardless of which cam you choose, you will need to upgrade the springs.

Last edited by Later-A-Body; 08-31-2015 at 05:45 PM. Reason: MISTAKE
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net