...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Transmission and Rear End
User Name
Password



View Poll Results: AL or Steel flywheel
AL 19 46.34%
Steel 22 53.66%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2010, 07:48 PM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,723
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 21 Posts
Default Consensus on AL vs Steel flywheels?

What is everyones experience with using an AL or Steel flywheel in a track oriented car?

I'm going to be running a TKO600 RR version behind a 600+hp FE with a big flat torque curve. Have a 3.70 locker right now but may move to a 4.10. My car is a pig weighing about 4k.

I see a lot of conflicting opinions on flywheel materials and weight.

Anybody have some real world experience they'd like to share?
__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-28-2010, 03:58 PM
The WidowMaker's Avatar
The WidowMaker The WidowMaker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca
Posts: 773
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

no real world, but i talked with mcleod and they stated that unless i wanted to burn up their rst clutch i needed their steel wheel. mine will be 90% street though. if that ratio was swapped, i would have gone aluminum and they would have recommended it as well. their alum 168 tooth LS wheel was 14 lbs and the steel is 24.
__________________
"The WidowMaker"
70 Chevelle Pro Touring - Garage Built, Backyard Painted
Custom 4 Link & Watts, Rushforth Wheels, Ats Spindles, McLeod RXT Twin Clutch, T56 Magnum, C6Z Calipers & Ring Bros Hinges
Special Thanks To: Rushforth Wheels ; Kore3 ; SC&C
Build Thread : https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...ght=widowmaker
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-28-2010, 10:10 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

You need 11 or better torque multiplication -- so your first gear ratio X's your rear end ratio --- answer should be 11. or higher

Use a FLUID DAMPER balancer

You'll hate an aluminum flywheel for a 4000# car on the street.... end of story.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-28-2010, 10:22 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Here's what Modern Drivelines says about Aluminum flywheels...

<quote> Aluminum flywheels were designed to lessen the rotating mass of the motor allowing the motor to spin up faster. A good application for this is road racing or auto-crossing. Aluminum flywheels don't present any issues on the street. However, the engine pulsations may be more prevalent as they are not dampened by the heavier steel flywheel. There is a steel facing that can be replaced once is it worn out. <end quote>


I disagree with them about the "street".... having owned more than a couple drag cars.... which used aluminum flywheels way back when.... but they were radical as well and a little tough to drive on the street anyway. But in a heavy street car - that flywheel mass or lack thereof will definitely be felt/noticed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2010, 10:27 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

These guys make a nice piece.... and have one for your FE

http://www.fidanza.com/aluminum-flywheels.aspx
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-29-2010, 01:12 AM
funcars funcars is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 82
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

To answer your question about track experience with aluminum: I have an aluminum flywheel with an 11" long style pressure plate in my Mustang and have found it liveable on the street. It works great on the track. The only issue I have on the street is that at lower rpms I have to be smooth or it can lurch back and forth, but it isn't a low rpm motor. It has a 378 with a big cam and ports and a larger cube motor with more torque would be easier to manage.
__________________
1970 Mach I 380 Dry Sump + lots of mods
1990 C4 Corvette 400 in solid roller
1965 Corvette - back to life some day
1970 1/2 Z28 project car
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net