...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



View Poll Results: What rim size to run in the rear of my 69 Camaro?
19x12: Make it work, who cares about running only one type of tire for the rest of your life!? 33 34.38%
18x12: They might not be as cool as 19x12, but come on here be more practicle! 63 65.63%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2006, 05:43 PM
Nutsy Nutsy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 179
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Wheel/Tire Dillema on my 69 Camaro

Please tell me what you would do. I have a 69 Camaro with DSE Tubs (not yet installed), and DSE Quadra link rear. I am fighting with myself about what rear rims/tires to run. Here is what i am looking at:

19x12 On the back with 345/30/19

Pros: Killer Looks, Killer stance, Rims that i want are available in 19x12
Cons: Michelin is the only people making a tire of that size, may require a bit more modification to clear properly

or...

18x12 on the back with 335/30/18

Pros: Plethora of tire choice
Cons: The rims i want aren't available in that size. Either would have to be modified or new rims chosen. Rims/Wheels may not fill the well the way i like and look too much like a donuts.

or...

Any idea's?

Trev

Last edited by Nutsy; 02-13-2006 at 05:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2006, 08:08 PM
JohnnyR JohnnyR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

19s look the best on a 67/78 due to the rounded wheel wells. Just check out Prodigy. On a 69, 18s look the best due to their squared-off wells. JMO

Personally, I like a little more sidewall on my tires. 18s for me.

-j
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-13-2006, 09:01 PM
Blake Foster's Avatar
Blake Foster Blake Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 2,526
Thanks: 6
Thanked 101 Times in 44 Posts
Default

You saw how the 335 look with the 20"s IMO the 19's just look better than 18's but that is a personal opinion, i can get you a really good deal on the tires and possibly the wheels as well, give me a call and i wil look into it for you. i would go for the wheels you want and suffer on the tire as the wheel is the most important part
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2006, 09:03 PM
Nutsy Nutsy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 179
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Blake I will give you a call tomorrow.

Trev
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-13-2006, 09:08 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyR
19s look the best on a 67/78 due to the rounded wheel wells. Just check out Prodigy. On a 69, 18s look the best due to their squared-off wells. JMO

Personally, I like a little more sidewall on my tires. 18s for me.

-j
Actually I think 18's look the best on a '67-68 if you have the stance right..

see:
http://www.z069.us/68/exterior/speedway.jpg

The main problem with 19's is the performance hit you take and the cost/limited availability of tires.

I say go with the 18's.. look great and gain performance.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-13-2006, 09:10 PM
Nutsy Nutsy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 179
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Why is there a performance hit with 19s?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-13-2006, 09:36 PM
BeCool68's Avatar
BeCool68 BeCool68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rogers AR
Posts: 131
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Just my thoughts

Thought I would chime in on this duscusion. I like the 18's on a 69 but like 17's on a 67 and 68 just wish the tire size was slight taller then the 315 35 17. 69's seems to have more wheel openning in the rear to handle 18's. Just my thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-13-2006, 09:40 PM
Speedster's Avatar
Speedster Speedster is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: East Coast of Florida
Posts: 983
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

nutsy -
The sidewall is so short on 19's. There is almost zero deflection (flex). The tire doesn't have as much chance to work as, well... a tire.
__________________
-Bruce
Project "Freebird"
Dyno Video
http://www.nelsonracingengines.com/...lownbbchigh.wmv
Project Rides:
1968 Firebird - Blown 540
1987 Blazer 4x4 - Blown 355
2007 Magnum
2010 Camaro SS - LSX Twin Turbo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-13-2006, 10:36 PM
Steve1968LS2's Avatar
Steve1968LS2 Steve1968LS2 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim Hills, CA
Posts: 5,534
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nutsy
Why is there a performance hit with 19s?
It has to do with moment of inertia and it's not just that the 19" combo is heavier. It's that it's heavier farther away from the center of the wheel. As weight moves farther from the center it has a exponentially worse effect both on acceleration on and on stopping.

Think of a lever and the saying "give me a lever long enough and I will move the world"..

Here, for braniacs (unlike myself) this site should give headache.. lol
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi.html

For people more like myself..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moment_of_inertia
&
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9042379

Ok, so they are talking about bike wheels.. same principal..
http://www.canecreek.com/168.html

So to sum it up:
Polar moment of inertia
The resistance of an object to rotational acceleration. When the mass of an object is distributed far from its axis of rotation, the object is said to have a high polar moment of inertia. When the mass distribution is close to the axis of rotation, it has a low polar moment of inertia


Wheel weight is bad.. wheel weight farther from the axis of rotation is worse. That why a 20-inch wheel that weights 30lbs is far worse in regards to acceleration and braking when compared to a 17" wheel.. even if they both weighed the same (which I doubt they would) since most of the weight of the 20" combo is so far from the center point of the wheel.

Did any of that make sense? lol

It's not that you shouldn't run 19's or 20's or whatever. It's just that you should know the physics behind what you decide to do and understand what trade offs some decisions entail.
__________________
"A ship in port is safe, but that's not what ships are built for."

See Bad Penny run the cones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUPPIX-92U

1971 Chevelle Wagon - Roadster Shop Chassis ProCharged Shafiroff LS and lots of yada yada

1968 Camaro - Project Track Rat - 440 RHS LS
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-10-2008, 10:57 AM
camaro2nv's Avatar
camaro2nv camaro2nv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Roseville
Posts: 687
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Nitto also makes a 345/30R19
Specs for ya
http://www.nittotire.com/#index%2Etire%2Einvo

Last edited by camaro2nv; 11-10-2008 at 11:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net