...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-01-2013, 08:48 AM
redefined's Avatar
redefined redefined is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default EFI SBC vs LS Motor

Just looking for some specifics on why to do one vs the other. Currently I have a 350 SBC & T-10 with the following mods:
  • Eldelbrock TEC 200 Aluminum Heads
  • COMP Cam 12-612-5 Solid Lifter Cam
  • Roller Rockers
  • Ceramic Coated Headers
  • Holley Competition 750 cfm
  • MSD Ignition
  • Super T10 4 Speed Transmission
  • Center Force Clutch
  • Scatter Shield
  • Hurst Comp Shifter
  • OEM Forged Crank
  • OEM polished rods
  • TRW pistons w/ floated wrist pins
  • Balanced rotating assembly
  • ARP Head Bolts & Fasteners

So I've been really interested in doing an LS swap, even have tossed the above setup for sale, but a friend says since I've already got some decent parts on this motor why not just EFI it?

Now my goal is 700whp with a blower - granted this will be a while down the road, one step at a time.

From what I've read, with no specifics other than newer technology, the LS motor does everything better. From fuel economy to making power and the important one drive-ability. A big one for me is the reliability and turning the key and having it start, without pushing the pedal 4 times etc. Yes the 350 has never let me down but I'm nervous every time it cranks for a min, ha!

So why not do an intake manifold and EFI on the 350 SBC? Why should I swap to the LS?

To you guys that have done the EFI on the 350, what parts have you used?

Thanks!!!
__________________
**Some people are like slinkies, they are not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs**
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-01-2013, 09:27 AM
ProTouring442's Avatar
ProTouring442 ProTouring442 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Harriman, TN
Posts: 1,330
Thanks: 19
Thanked 34 Times in 16 Posts
Default

I am no expert, but from what I have read, it seems to me that when it comes to breathing, the LS engines are really more akin to a Big Block, and that's the big difference between the old Small Block and the LS engines.
__________________
You ever wonder what medieval cook looked at the guts of a pig and thought, "I bet if you washed out that poop tube, you could stuff it with meat and eat it."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-01-2013, 11:34 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

You can make the same power in a more reliable package with an Ls.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-19-2013, 03:38 PM
TheJDMan's Avatar
TheJDMan TheJDMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 690
Thanks: 5
Thanked 25 Times in 13 Posts
Default

The irony is that with all the interest in LS conversions, the SBC parts are becoming very inexpensive. While I continue to monitor LS conversions, at least for the forseeable future I will be running a SBC. I am considering a throttle body EFI to replace my Holley double pumper at some point.
__________________
Steve Hayes
"Dust Off"
68 Camaro
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, that's what gets you!
"Jeremy Clarkson"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-19-2013, 11:38 PM
redefined's Avatar
redefined redefined is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJDMan View Post
The irony is that with all the interest in LS conversions, the SBC parts are becoming very inexpensive. While I continue to monitor LS conversions, at least for the forseeable future I will be running a SBC. I am considering a throttle body EFI to replace my Holley double pumper at some point.
I've thought about it. If you do this you still have to do all of the other 'fuel' parts. Tank/pump/regulator/lines etc. At which point if you decide to go LS it'll already be done, ya? Or am I missing something here?

I thought about converting my built SBC over to fuel injection too, or even procharging it but my compression is a little to high at 10:1
__________________
**Some people are like slinkies, they are not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs**
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-20-2013, 05:52 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,537
Thanks: 1,326
Thanked 802 Times in 609 Posts
Default

It's like Todd said, the LS does it more reliably. Even with your goal of 700whp, the LS will be more reliable though it's arguable what constitute reliable at that power level. If you were wanting a lower power level, say 500 or so at the wheels, I'd say stay SBC because with a blower that's not difficult or really even pushing limits and a good EFI system will allow for good drivability.

The other thing to keep in mind when building a forced induction car is where the power comes on. As an example, to me, a Procharger is a terrible choice for a pro-touring car or really any car not being drag raced. Go drive one and you should realize very quickly that it does not produce a linear power band and they have terrible lag(I know nothing about their new intelligent design so maybe that's changed) which is not enjoyable when going on and off throttle and around corners. So achieving your goals with boost and how much boost will be needed also has to be taken into consideration. At 700whp, the LS will do this better as well needing less boost which will allow for an engine that isn't piss poor when not under boost.

I would recommend building towards the ultimate goal from the get go or else you'll be redoing lots of stuff. If going for 700whp is required to you, get an LS now and call that part done.
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2000 BMW 540i/6 and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-20-2013, 10:15 PM
redefined's Avatar
redefined redefined is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 126
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the response.

However, I'm not sure about your 'lag' description. Superchargers are far more linear than a turbo is, am I missing something here? Is it the that style supercharger, a Procharger that's not as linear?

I've own supercharged and turbocharged vehicles, mostly BMW's and the supercharger on that one was far more linear and constant than the turbo. On a road course you better know exactly when that turbo will spool or you'll be going sideways.

Correct me where I'm wrong! Thanks!
__________________
**Some people are like slinkies, they are not really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs**
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-22-2013, 02:17 PM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,201
Thanks: 6,546
Thanked 2,009 Times in 914 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSSix View Post
It's like Todd said, the LS does it more reliably. Even with your goal of 700whp, the LS will be more reliable though it's arguable what constitute reliable at that power level. If you were wanting a lower power level, say 500 or so at the wheels, I'd say stay SBC because with a blower that's not difficult or really even pushing limits and a good EFI system will allow for good drivability.

The other thing to keep in mind when building a forced induction car is where the power comes on. As an example, to me, a Procharger is a terrible choice for a pro-touring car or really any car not being drag raced. Go drive one and you should realize very quickly that it does not produce a linear power band and they have terrible lag(I know nothing about their new intelligent design so maybe that's changed) which is not enjoyable when going on and off throttle and around corners. So achieving your goals with boost and how much boost will be needed also has to be taken into consideration. At 700whp, the LS will do this better as well needing less boost which will allow for an engine that isn't piss poor when not under boost.

I would recommend building towards the ultimate goal from the get go or else you'll be redoing lots of stuff. If going for 700whp is required to you, get an LS now and call that part done.
I've had three Procharged builds, none of them had any lag. Instant boost on WOT, maybe not max boost immediately, but enough to blow the tires off. Definitely not laggy like a turbo setup with the wrong or improperly sized turbo would have. And far less heat management issues than a front mounted turbo setup. Personally, I'm sold on the roots type blowers now for true instant boost and driveability. They may not make as much HP as turbos, but far easier to package and maintain, far less heat issues to deal with.
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net