...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-19-2014, 11:09 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,535
Thanks: 1,321
Thanked 797 Times in 607 Posts
Default SpeedTech or RideTech?

I've pretty much decided between these two companies for suspension on my TA. I'm not worried about quality of the components or the companies. What I wondering is how about the other stuff like exhaust routing options or difficulty. Which can have the car the lowest while still having good suspension travel? Which can work with my 10 bolt easiest? Are the front suspension designs significantly different? Anything else I should know or take into consideration before deciding which route to choose?

Edit: I'm keeping my stock front subframe in case that wasn't clear. I'm looking mainly at the Grand Touring kit from SpeedTech and Ride Techs equivalent'.


Thanks
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2000 BMW 540i/6 and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims

Last edited by WSSix; 01-20-2014 at 09:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-20-2014, 10:15 AM
RoadRace Elco's Avatar
RoadRace Elco RoadRace Elco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: California
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSSix View Post
I've pretty much decided between these two companies for suspension on my TA. I'm not worried about quality of the components or the companies. What I wondering is how about the other stuff like exhaust routing options or difficulty. Which can have the car the lowest while still having good suspension travel? Which can work with my 10 bolt easiest? Are the front suspension designs significantly different? Anything else I should know or take into consideration before deciding which route to choose?

Thanks
Speedtech with Ridetech shocks you cant go wrong with that...trust me
__________________
1966 El Camino
383 500hp at flywheel
Keisler SS700 5 speed
Mass-Flow Injection
12 Bolt 3:73
Speed Tech full suspension
Ride Tech Coil Overs
Rushforth 18's
Wilwood 6 piston with 14" rotors
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-20-2014, 10:20 AM
DOOM's Avatar
DOOM DOOM is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Side Chicago
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 7
Thanked 64 Times in 40 Posts
Default

Trey both good companies but Speed Tech would be my first choice. If I could do it over again I would do Speed Tech hands down!!
__________________
Mario
USCOLLISION
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-20-2014, 10:58 AM
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi's Avatar
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi OBeer-WAN-Kenobi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I'm currently looking at these two as well. I'm personally thinking of sticking with a stock sub and going ridetech as I don't think I would ever get my money's worth out of the speedtech sub frame. I don't think mine will make it to the track but once a year if I'm really lucky but I want a good handling car. My current opinion is that ridetech fits that bill fairly well. Plus I can get both the front and rear suspension for less than a complete speedtech front sub

Then again, I could be talked into the speedtech still as well, and I need to call them and clear up some things.
__________________
'69 RS Camaro
'99 SWB Silverado LS "Beater"
'01 GMC Sierra 2500HD LQ4 (Turbo build)
'04 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4X4


My '69 Camaro Build Thread
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-20-2014, 12:15 PM
cwylie cwylie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 400
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts
Default

I have a ridetech front end kit on my car with the arms, spindles, coilovers and Im planning to get the true turn kit. I have the speedtech torque arm on the rear with ride tech coilovers. I liked the ride tech front setup better with the stock subframe and I liked the speedtech torque arm over the ridetech 4 link.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-20-2014, 05:30 PM
Rod P's Avatar
Rod P Rod P is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Thompsons Station, TN
Posts: 977
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OBeer-WAN-Kenobi View Post
I don't think mine will make it to the track but once a year if I'm really lucky but I want a good handling car. My current opinion is that ridetech fits that bill fairly well. Plus I can get both the front and rear suspension for less than a complete speedtech front sub
I race the Ridetech setup twice a month sometimes more, always one of the fastest cars on track




Quote:
Originally Posted by cwylie View Post
I liked the speedtech torque arm over the ridetech 4 link.
???why?? just curious
__________________
Rod Prouty
My websiteAuto-cross 101
I'm not a Real Racer but I did spend a night in the Pozzi's motor-home
Bangshift Stories
I’m not the smartest guy at the track … but when he goes home … I’m still there testing, tuning, learning & getting faster.

Last edited by Rod P; 01-20-2014 at 05:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-20-2014, 09:00 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,535
Thanks: 1,321
Thanked 797 Times in 607 Posts
Default

Rod, I know you're a 1st gen but how difficult was routing the exhaust? Any reason you can think it would be different for me?

I appreciate the responses everyone. Please, keep them coming. I'm quite a ways out from doing anything, maybe later this year, so I have time.

OBeer, I think you'll be fine keeping your front subframe. I know the 1st gens aren't as good as 2nd gens from the factory, but based on how you think you'll be driving, I see no reason to spend the extra money on a new subframe. I consider myself to be in the same boat, and I intend to keep my factory subframe.

Thanks
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2000 BMW 540i/6 and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-21-2014, 08:20 AM
cwylie cwylie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 400
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod P View Post
I race the Ridetech setup twice a month sometimes more, always one of the fastest cars on track






???why?? just curious
I liked that I was able to get it with all the tabs already welded to the axle from currie. Plus it looked like it freed up some room to run the exhaust above the axle. Im running ride tech shocks with with speedtech torque arm though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-21-2014, 12:14 PM
Blake Foster's Avatar
Blake Foster Blake Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 2,526
Thanks: 6
Thanked 101 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WSSix View Post
I've pretty much decided between these two companies for suspension on my TA. I'm not worried about quality of the components or the companies. What I wondering is how about the other stuff like exhaust routing options or difficulty. Which can have the car the lowest while still having good suspension travel? Which can work with my 10 bolt easiest? Are the front suspension designs significantly different? Anything else I should know or take into consideration before deciding which route to choose?

Edit: I'm keeping my stock front subframe in case that wasn't clear. I'm looking mainly at the Grand Touring kit from SpeedTech and Ride Techs equivalent'.


Thanks
Lots of good questions there.
Exhaust. I think Ours has more clearance above the Axle due to the fact that there are no upper arms to contend with, BOTH will need custom tail pipes. I know you can fit 3" in ours and if it is built correctly they will not contact the axle prior to the axle contacting the floor or frame. We always use the cut and weld method when building our tail pipes. more labour intensive but you get a much better fitting part.

Ride height. I think you will find that both will get you the ride height you are looking for. the 1 advantage of the Torque arm is you really don't need to worry about the pinion angle. because there is no change during the travel. so you can adjust the ride height and not have to readjust the pinion angle one it is initially set.

Rear end. the 10 bolt poses a bit of an issue for us as you would need to modify the 12bolt front billet mount to fit the 10 bolt. we have the rear mounting ring it is just the front probably 2 hours of work and some aluminum welding (sorry) if your budget allows I would consider a 9" we can build one any width with the brackets already installed THEN the housing is straightened including 31 spline axles ford Nodular center section, TrueTrak diff, Timken Bearings ready to bolt together (the third member is assembled)
the 9" allows more floor clearance due to the pinion location being lower and further back plus it's cheaper than a 12 bolt.

Front suspension design. Almost identical. Our Chicane coil over mount is a big advantage and lets you run a longer shock and spring if you thinking of going that way.
__________________
Blake Foster
www.speedtechperformance.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net