...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-12-2017, 10:51 AM
vintageracer's Avatar
vintageracer vintageracer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Hillbilly Hollywood, Tennessee
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default "The New Face Of Musclecars" as Proclaimed by Hot Rod Magazine!

I just received my latest issue of Hot Rod Magazine with a Roadster Shop Camaro build and a Timeless Kustoms Mustang build featured on the cover with the pronouncement "The New Face of Musclecars"!

I looked at both cars and read the articles associated with both and came away asking myself IF this IS the "The New Face of Musclecars" maybe it's truly is time to buy a new late model Musclecar!

First let me state that both cars have FANTASTIC craftsmanship and attention to detail. I am sure the builders are proud of their work and they should be.

Having said that my first reaction to looking at the pictures of the Roadster Shop Camaro was "Somebody decided they wanted to make a Late Model Challenger out of a 1969 Camaro"! That's what the RS Camaro looks like to ME! Look at the front-end & lower valence, the rear-end & tailights and the mirrors!

My first reaction to the Timeless Kustoms Mustang was that somebody hung a set of 4WD flares and a snow plow on the front of a 65 Mustang! Well done? Absolutely however that still does not change my opinion of what it looks like.

In each of the articles describing the cars Hot Rod references the Pro-Touring influence. Is this what Pro-Touring and the "Musclecar" hobby has come to? Kinda reminds me of the Pastel color & Tweed Interior craze in Street Rods during the 1990's. It was Kool for awhile and then the cars that followed that trend passed being out date and went straight to UGLY!

In the beginning of PT we had the iconic Camaro's designed, engineered and built by Mark Stielow. The combination of late model driving technology in an old American 1969 Camaro. The builds were ALL about the engine, suspension and modern day performance applied to a 1969 Camaro. His cars were NOT catalog cars where you purchased pre-engineered suspension and engine components. His cars engineered and inspired the parts that are NOW only a click away today on the internet. Body Mods? On Mark's cars there are NONE unless you call removing emblems a mod! We also got the "Name Thing" going for a car. Gotta have a name or your car is just a car. Each of Mark's newest builds raised the bar for performance, engineering and handling. All the while the Camaro body on his cars "Remained the Same" and the paint was a solid color.

Next came all the interior mods in the form of fancy dash's, door panels, seats and consoles. All of a sudden you had to have an "Interior" to be noticed. Now it's body modifications. Apparently the wilder the better.

Today with the all performance parts, suspension parts and interior parts just click away all that's left to modify and "Get Noticed" is the body. So let's see how outrageous we can get to be noticed. All you have do is look at the SEMA 2016 cars/trucks to see this is certainly true!

To me one of the finest builds in our hobby was built over 10 years ago by Johnson's Hot Rod Shop for Bob Johnson. Remember the G Force Cuda? Back in the day (2005 I think) while we were on the Hot Rod Power Tour it was late one night in Georgia when Bob, myself and Bill Howell were having a late night dinner at Applebee's when Bob said the only stock body part on the car was the trunk-lid. The car looked FANTASTIC with NOTHING cartoonish or out of place about the car yet Hot Wheels thought enough of the car to make a Hot Wheels version of the car. You knew the G Force Cuda body was modified but HOW? NOW it seems to ME that the more body mods, flares, scoops, nips, tucks you can do to the body WITHOUT regard to good design, style and proportion the better.

If this truly is "The New Face Of Musclecars" as Proclaimed by Hot Rod Magazine I'm out! Hell ya I am old HOWEVER I have always embraced "Change" as "Change" is going to happen with or without me so I might as well be on the front-end and benefit from "Change" rather than be a VICTIM of "Change".

In this situation I will do neither. I will not benefit from the "The New Face Of Musclecars" as Proclaimed by Hot Rod Magazine as I sure as Hell do not want one and therefore I will not be a Victim of "Change" when once again styles and preferences change.

2 Weeks ago I walked through our local "Cars & Coffee". 1000 cars and 1 Airstream trailer were there. I was more interested in the Airstream than any of the cars/trucks that were there. Times Change, Wants Change, Desires Change and Styles Change.

It is my Hope and Desire that this excess of "Reimagined Sheetmetal" as quoted by Hot Rod Magazine will take it's short time in the spotlight and join the Pastel Colored Street Rods of the 1990's as a discussion of "What the Hell were We Thinking When We Thought That Was Kool Way Back Then"!

Just MY Opinion!

What do Ya'll think?
Attached Images
 
__________________
Mike

Remember "Drive Fast, Turn Heads, Break Hearts"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-12-2017, 01:39 PM
LateralJeaz's Avatar
LateralJeaz LateralJeaz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 76
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Like it or not, extensive body mods are probably here to stay. Yes it's hard to get it right and easy to make it look funky, and I also agree that those two cars in particular have some weird looking areas that are not my favorite. But for everything out there that doesn't look quite right to me, I can think of another car thats been extensively body modded yet feels spot on visually. Ring Brothers, Ironworks, Foose, the Roadster Shop; all these guys have displayed heavily body modded cars at sema in the past five years that look amazing imo. In the end I think its important to take it all in context and understand that most of these cars are built to somewhat customer specs and personal preferences. If hot rod mag loves it, more power to these builders, but surely it's mostly about the customer satisfaction, not journalists, and not ours.

Last edited by LateralJeaz; 06-12-2017 at 02:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-12-2017, 05:56 PM
ironworks's Avatar
ironworks ironworks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 5,155
Thanks: 4
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Default

I had a similar thought last week when I read the article. Mine was a bit more positive. I think they meant that the heavy mods you have seen on, lets say street rods are coming around to the muscle cars. This hobby is really a contest of who can out do the other. SO the laundry list of mods needs to get longer and longer for some people to compete. Or think that is what they have to do to compete.

Our mentality is to not try and really mess up what ever made the original design so popular when some one modifies a certain model car. So people can't transition a rendering to reality, Some people start with an ugly concept, some people just have bad taste.

But at the end of every day, different styles are what make the world go round. There is a girl for every guy and an ass for every seat. Just look at some ugly guy or gal and think some where there is some one who is excited to come home to that ugly mug. Cars are the same way. As long as the customer is happy and its not your friends car you have to act like their car is so cool, when its not.

Plus every builder has a different style and most customers are drawn to that build for some reason. If they are local its probably the fact they do quality work and if they are long distance its usually because they have seen a few cars that build has done and they want some thing with that style.


But good Lord Almight there are some funky looking cars that get built. I wish I could post some of the stuff my friends have txt or PM'ed me on social media over the years.
__________________
www.ironworksspeedandkustom.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-12-2017, 08:42 PM
JB400's Avatar
JB400 JB400 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 132
Thanks: 19
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Personally, I do think shops like RS over due it, and forget what parts of each car make it timeless. However, if they didn't change it, people would get tired of looking at all the same thing.

This coming from the guy that got ripped on because I think RS ruined the looks of the Sliced Charger (sliced too much in my opinion), the 68 looks better, but not by much. A Charger isn't a Camaro.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-12-2017, 09:39 PM
DBasher's Avatar
DBasher DBasher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 257
Thanked 273 Times in 80 Posts
Default

I haven't read the article but I did get to see both cars at SEMA and spend sometime looking them over....hardly the "New face of musclecars". I saw more classics with subtle upgrades to the body, or mods that you didn't notice right off because they just looked right. Was the over the top, look at me cars there? Of course, it's SEMA.

Like mentioned in another thread, the new norm is the fit and finish, attention to detail and the quality of materials used throughout. Think about the Ironworks Chevelle from a few years ago, basic and people loved it. Or the RB widened Mustang, subtle to most with over the top attention to detail.

Next month Hot Rod magazine will put a 50's car on the cover (another SEMA car) with another headline...just to get people talking.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-13-2017, 07:00 AM
Zspoiler's Avatar
Zspoiler Zspoiler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Federal Way,WA
Posts: 169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default

In some ways its sort of like George Barris era and the later IMSA Race cars with a modern twist.Some people like it and some don`t
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-18-2017, 07:43 AM
214Chevy's Avatar
214Chevy 214Chevy is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DALLAS, Texas
Posts: 4,688
Thanks: 458
Thanked 687 Times in 421 Posts
Default

Personally, me...I like the look of customized cars. Even if it means it may be out of style 10 years from now. I love it. Everything we have from the clothes we wear, to our hairstyles, the curtains/furniture in our houses, etc has a "time factor" so to speak. So, these builds are no different in the grand scheme of things. Trust me, if I had it like that, three shops that I would run to for them to build me a car are Greening Auto, Roadster Shop and Ring Brothers. I know there are others out there who may be considered far better builders in other peoples opinion, but I love the builds these three shops do with all of the custom one-off billet pieces, etc. The thing is with these super builds as I would call them, the owners probably have little say so in my opinion. Sure, the builders run almost everything by them and get some sort of approval, but most of the time these rich guys are all too familiar with the work and craftsmenship of the builder and already know who they're dealing with and what kind of high quality work they put out. So, I'm sure the rich guy says "I have $550k budget, here's my car and I want a Ridler contender or I want it done by SEMA, etc." then just drops the car off with a huge deposit and that's when the shop gets to working on the car 40 hours a week pretty much and stays on it and it becomes there baby for the next 10 months in order to present it for the top car of that year and be in all of the magazines like Inferno and Viscious. Also, they leave much of the design fabrication up to the builder and his imagination. Think about it, these guys are just rich and are probably not designers or fabricators. LOL!! So, the builder models something like the rear taillights in modelworks or whatever 3D software he uses and emails a pic of it to the owner and since it has probably never been done before, the owner so calls loves it. All the owner knows is it's one-off and it's guaranteed that no one else will have it. One thing about it is, I'll probably never have a car like this built, but if I did, the builder would be mad at me because soon as it was finished I want my damn car. There would be no keeping it for a year or so showing it all around the country. I'm picking my car up from the second it finished.
__________________
'68 C10 swb
'69 Camaro convertible
'72 Chevelle


Last edited by 214Chevy; 06-18-2017 at 07:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net