More capable in just about everything and can have better driveability. There is more resolution in the VE & timing tables, there are more options for IAC & AC control (i.e. it can delay the kick in of the AC clutch until the IAC bumps the idle), more AE fuel & decel fuel cut options/parameters, etc. It also has traction control built in, more switchable inputs/outputs, and lots of nice boost related features-- With a FAST when intake temps heat up you can only add fuel, but with the AEM you can add fuel, subtract timing, and if turbo'd and controlling the bleed solenoid with the AEM you can have the ECU pull boost out too in whatever combination you want.
It is far more involved & intensive to tune the AEM compared to a FAST but there are a TON of nice features. Unfortunately if you don't know what you are doing you can get in over your head in a big hurry! Their tuning software has a lot of things shown that the FAST software hides in order to be less confusing and more user friendly.
What it boils down to in the end is that it's always best to buy a system either you feel comfortable tuning yourself or has local tuning support. The best and most capable ECU out there won't do you any good if you can't tune it yourself or nobody locally can help you tune it.
__________________
1969 Chevelle
Old setup: Procharged/intercooled/EFI 353 SBC, TKO, ATS/SPC/Global West suspension, C6 brakes & hydroboost.
In progress: LS2, 3.0 Whipple, T56 Magnum, torque arm & watts link, Wilwood Aero6/4 brakes, Mk60 ABS, Vaporworx, floater 9" rear, etc.
Last edited by Blown353; 02-24-2007 at 06:02 PM.
|