...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-19-2010, 10:28 AM
GM Muscle's Avatar
GM Muscle GM Muscle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 648
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

i swapped them and it was very simple. i just held the motor with a cherry picker and put jackstands under the mounts. no issues.. thanks guys
__________________
'69 Camaro- Daily Driver
'70 Chevelle- Project
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-20-2010, 01:29 AM
1970camaroRS 1970camaroRS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 181
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GM Muscle View Post
i swapped them and it was very simple. i just held the motor with a cherry picker and put jackstands under the mounts. no issues.. thanks guys
No problem!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-26-2010, 07:48 AM
Bow Tie 67's Avatar
Bow Tie 67 Bow Tie 67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NW burbs, IL
Posts: 525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have an 08 L92, is it true the factory rod bolts were upgraded and less susceptable to breaking? Would changing the bolts still be recommended?
__________________
Matt

Project: " Chain Reaction "

A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.



1969 RS Camaro, L92 T56, Chassisworks sub, Quadra-Link, Bear, Ford 9".
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-26-2010, 08:21 AM
69MyWay's Avatar
69MyWay 69MyWay is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clinton, IL
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 6 Posts
Default

I would suggest leaving them alone "if" you know the motor was healthy when pulled.

For the power level you are after, they will be fine in stock form.

Removing them, resizing...etc, etc, will throw some money after something that isn't broken - imho.

Then...if you do break them, you get a great excuse to put the stroker crank in there!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-26-2010, 09:59 AM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,310
Thanks: 7,023
Thanked 2,154 Times in 991 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69MyWay View Post
I would suggest leaving them alone "if" you know the motor was healthy when pulled.

For the power level you are after, they will be fine in stock form.

Removing them, resizing...etc, etc, will throw some money after something that isn't broken - imho.

Then...if you do break them, you get a great excuse to put the stroker crank in there!
the LS rod bolts do not require re-sizing of the rods, so they're pretty cheap and easy to do. With that said, I did them on my LQ9 because I plan on making over 500 hp and felt it was cheap insurance.

Jody
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-08-2010, 09:23 AM
Bow Tie 67's Avatar
Bow Tie 67 Bow Tie 67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NW burbs, IL
Posts: 525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

So I pulled the pan today and spoke with ARP. They said there is no way of telling if replacing them would throw the rod end out of round. ( cracked cap rods are not resized ) I have the bolts, but I'm vacillating on if I should proceed. The engine is an 08 6.2 with SPS 12.9 bolts from the factory. I read somewhere that GM had upgraded the rod bolts sometime in the last few years. I have 5k on the engine and she put down 420 at the rear wheels, I do plan on making more power in the future.

Opinions?

What level of power is safe with a stock short block?

Edit:

Here is what I found, stock 12.9 bolts have an equivalent strength of 156,600 yield & 174,000 Tensile.

Arp 234-6301 bolts are 180,000 yield & 215 - 220 Tensile.

Increased rpm redline is the main cause of rod bolt failure.

I have decided to go ahead and replace the bolts. I will be using a stretch gauge, ( most accurate method ), and only loosen one bolt at a time.
__________________
Matt

Project: " Chain Reaction "

A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.



1969 RS Camaro, L92 T56, Chassisworks sub, Quadra-Link, Bear, Ford 9".

Last edited by Bow Tie 67; 03-08-2010 at 02:41 PM. Reason: More info,
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-09-2010, 03:27 AM
69MyWay's Avatar
69MyWay 69MyWay is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Clinton, IL
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 8
Thanked 13 Times in 6 Posts
Default

I think either way you are okay. The reason I mentioned what I did, is there are many companies building super chargers, turbo chargers...and other head/cam packages that push LS power way up, and none of them "REQUIRE" a rod bolt swap.

We are working on a 700 rwhp single turbo 1999 Trans Am right now that has been flogged by the owner and is still sitting on the stock bottom end that has 140K miles.

If I had the engine out in parts and was assembling it...this is a no-brainer question. However...I too would be hesitant to disturb the apple cart if there isn't currently a problem knowing that there are plenty of motors putting down tons of power that have full stock bottom ends.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-09-2010, 05:26 AM
Bow Tie 67's Avatar
Bow Tie 67 Bow Tie 67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NW burbs, IL
Posts: 525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I wish I spent less time reading. Had I never read anything about the rod bolts, I would be fat, dumb and happy.
__________________
Matt

Project: " Chain Reaction "

A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.



1969 RS Camaro, L92 T56, Chassisworks sub, Quadra-Link, Bear, Ford 9".
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-16-2010, 02:37 PM
70rs's Avatar
70rs 70rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Washington State
Posts: 3,683
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

It is my understanding that the early LS1s were the problematic rod bolt engines. I have read and been told that anything after 2000 is upgraded from the factory and that ALL of the 6.0 and 6.2 LS engines are not a problem in regards to the rod bolt failures. However, any time an engine is pushing much over the stock horse power levels they should be replaced. So for the 08 L92 6.2 the stock bolts are fine if the engine will not be spun to the moon and the power level is kept reasonable.

But as stated above. They are cheap insurance any time the engine is apart.
__________________
Eric

1970 Camaro.....on the road someday!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net