...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-16-2012, 04:26 PM
musclecarmatt's Avatar
musclecarmatt musclecarmatt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Irmo,SC
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Junky View Post
I'm a big fan of the Canton road race pan I have been using. I just had to purchase another one recently and IIRC it was about $350 to my door.
i really aiming toward canton pan.....also hows the clearance far as headers,oil filter...etc?...like to have a pan that fits the stock subframe without having to modify....
__________________
1971 Chevrolet Camaro RS-Detroit Speed Equipped with PTFB chassis Bracing..autox specified.
1966 Chevrolet C-10-Driver/Project truck

My Garage:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Bellam...22910454430687
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-16-2012, 07:40 PM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I dont have any clearance issues other than it being really close to my rack-n-pinion unit. I'm using part #15-250. My guess is you will probably need the same part no. if you are running a small block.
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-16-2012, 08:10 PM
musclecarmatt's Avatar
musclecarmatt musclecarmatt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Irmo,SC
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Junky View Post
I dont have any clearance issues other than it being really close to my rack-n-pinion unit. I'm using part #15-250. My guess is you will probably need the same part no. if you are running a small block.
thanks...i emailed canton racing products see what pan they reccomend.....you have their pickup and oil pump also?
__________________
1971 Chevrolet Camaro RS-Detroit Speed Equipped with PTFB chassis Bracing..autox specified.
1966 Chevrolet C-10-Driver/Project truck

My Garage:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Bellam...22910454430687
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-16-2012, 11:15 PM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I have their pan and pickup. I'm running a high pressure high volume Melling pump but that is due to running a remote filter, oil thermostat, oil cooler, all running through -12 sized lines. You wont need a specific pump for the pan and pick up to work. Pumps typically dont dictate what pick up to use as they are all typically in standard location but pans will vary in depth so be sure to purchase the pick up that goes with the pan.

Others may have a difference in opinion but If you are thinking about replacing your pump I like to stick to the rule of thumb thats been around forever which is 10 lbs of oil pressure for every 1000 rpm......so if your spinning to 6500 rpm 65 lbs of pressure at that rpm should be adequate.

Most important part of an oiling system is that the pick up is always submerged in oil and never given the opportunity to suck air.

I sucked a Moroso pan dry at the end of a long straight with a left hand up hill turn once and that incident cost me a rod bearing. I believe that happened due to the pan not having any trap doors to trap the oil beneath the pump/pickup.
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino

Last edited by Track Junky; 11-16-2012 at 11:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-18-2012, 07:11 AM
musclecarmatt's Avatar
musclecarmatt musclecarmatt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Irmo,SC
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Junky View Post
I have their pan and pickup. I'm running a high pressure high volume Melling pump but that is due to running a remote filter, oil thermostat, oil cooler, all running through -12 sized lines. You wont need a specific pump for the pan and pick up to work. Pumps typically dont dictate what pick up to use as they are all typically in standard location but pans will vary in depth so be sure to purchase the pick up that goes with the pan.

Others may have a difference in opinion but If you are thinking about replacing your pump I like to stick to the rule of thumb thats been around forever which is 10 lbs of oil pressure for every 1000 rpm......so if your spinning to 6500 rpm 65 lbs of pressure at that rpm should be adequate.

Most important part of an oiling system is that the pick up is always submerged in oil and never given the opportunity to suck air.

I sucked a Moroso pan dry at the end of a long straight with a left hand up hill turn once and that incident cost me a rod bearing. I believe that happened due to the pan not having any trap doors to trap the oil beneath the pump/pickup.
looking into the canton pan...with built in windage tray and trap doors....probably end up going with their matching pickup and stick a high volume oil pump in their as well...taking i got a standard oil pump in their now......

few people suggest running at setrab oil cooler as well......
__________________
1971 Chevrolet Camaro RS-Detroit Speed Equipped with PTFB chassis Bracing..autox specified.
1966 Chevrolet C-10-Driver/Project truck

My Garage:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Bellam...22910454430687
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-18-2012, 07:47 AM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

I dont think you will have any issues with a high volume pump but before buying something like that ask yourself why you need it. How will a high volume pump benefit your current engine set up? Why not high pressure as apposed to high volume? You dont need to answer that......just saying talk to some engine builders and get educated.

An oil cooler set up can be done any time. If all your doing is autocross you may not need it. You'll know after installing an oil temp gauge.

It's easy to spend in this hobby and if you are on a budget you'll want to spend smart. Keep us posted
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-18-2012, 07:56 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

If you do plan to add a cooler and/or accumulator then a high volume pump is likely a good idea. I'd also change to full synthetic oil to help with viscosity at higher oil temps.

For autocross, a road race pan only will be sufficient.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-18-2012, 09:09 AM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,034
Thanks: 33
Thanked 101 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Question: Could a road race pan with high volume pump (w/o remote filter, cooler, accumulator) increase the possibility of a starvation condition vs a high pressure std volume pump?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-18-2012, 04:49 PM
musclecarmatt's Avatar
musclecarmatt musclecarmatt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Irmo,SC
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Junky View Post
I dont think you will have any issues with a high volume pump but before buying something like that ask yourself why you need it. How will a high volume pump benefit your current engine set up? Why not high pressure as apposed to high volume? You dont need to answer that......just saying talk to some engine builders and get educated.

An oil cooler set up can be done any time. If all your doing is autocross you may not need it. You'll know after installing an oil temp gauge.

It's easy to spend in this hobby and if you are on a budget you'll want to spend smart. Keep us posted
i understand completely and looking at all options its going be abit before i can order an parts yet....just trying gain some knowledge and ask bunch of questions lol...

so far i know....i going to be getting new pan w/matching pickup...add oil temp gauge and pressure guage....so keep track of what its doing around the track.....think mostly a high volume pump over standard is moves 20%-30% more i think....
__________________
1971 Chevrolet Camaro RS-Detroit Speed Equipped with PTFB chassis Bracing..autox specified.
1966 Chevrolet C-10-Driver/Project truck

My Garage:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Bellam...22910454430687
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-18-2012, 04:55 PM
musclecarmatt's Avatar
musclecarmatt musclecarmatt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Irmo,SC
Posts: 63
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sieg View Post
Question: Could a road race pan with high volume pump (w/o remote filter, cooler, accumulator) increase the possibility of a starvation condition vs a high pressure std volume pump?
to me like you said the high volume probably work best with a remote filter,cooler and accumulator being that its going to move more volume through them compenents.....being that i still running the oil filter on the motor with adding an accumulator the high pressure pump should be plenty......i think it would be upgrade with the new road race pan...over factory standard pump....could be the factory pump mite be sufficient?
__________________
1971 Chevrolet Camaro RS-Detroit Speed Equipped with PTFB chassis Bracing..autox specified.
1966 Chevrolet C-10-Driver/Project truck

My Garage:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Bellam...22910454430687
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net