...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-13-2015, 01:33 PM
ArisESQ ArisESQ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Gatos
Posts: 765
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sik68 View Post
I love this thing, and I understand they put a 3.5L Ecoboost because they want to race the 4.0L category in LeMans. They'd be crazy not to offer a v8!

Also, Tag Juechter, chief Corvette engineer, did say that the production version of the GT will have to look quite a bit different to meet crash standards. First of all, it will need bumpers.
Curious why he thinks that. The previous generation Ford GT looked almost identical to it's concept and didn't have significantly larger bumpers or anything.

2002 Ford GT Concept:


2005 Production Ford GT:


I wouldn't at all be surprised if they offered a V8 version as well - like how the R8 comes with either the V8 or the V10. 600 HP for a flagship supercar is somewhat "average" considering what's available now.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-13-2015, 04:45 PM
tones2SS's Avatar
tones2SS tones2SS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8,176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMR Sales View Post
Not sure of my opinion yet. The last GT looked so much like the original GT40 that you couldn't dislike it. This one is edgy & with an EcoBoost V-6.
Edgy is right.
Don't like the looks or the V6 "twin turbo". Like others have posted earlier,...they should have had an option if you wanted the V8. Same goes for the 2016/2017 Raptor. I LOVE the way the Raptor looks, but a V6?!? No thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-14-2015, 05:39 AM
JsTA JsTA is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 46
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

I read an article yesterday saying that because of EPA and CAFE standards Ford's lineup will be v8 free by like 2018. Including all trucks and top of the line Mustangs as well.

Don't blame Ford. Blame the out of control EPA/government.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-14-2015, 10:01 AM
Lowfast's Avatar
Lowfast Lowfast is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Texan finally back in Texas!
Posts: 130
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The flat plane v8 would be cool but the 3.5 ecoboost is probably a better choice from a performance/weight standpoint. It is supposed to have over 600hp and the smaller engine I am sure lent itself to better packaging in the overall design. If the headers are properly configured it could still have a very mean exhaust note. My guess is that with simple tunes these things will be putting 700-800 to the wheels no problem. I am glad they skipped all the gimmicky hybrid crap and just went for a proper rear drive, mid engine platform. Keep it light and powerful. If is it around $150k it will be a bargain.
__________________
1965 Ford Falcon Hardtop - PT Build
TCI Supension | Team III Wheels | Ford 3v 4.6 & TR3650
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-17-2015, 05:07 PM
J-440's Avatar
J-440 J-440 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 208
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Looking at the rear of the car, it seems that with the "airflow gaps" for aero made the engine compartment more narrow than the previous GT. Would this be the reason for the 6 cylinder configuration? Also, that Ford V8 is as wide as an older HEMI. Would love to see where the turbos are stashed.
__________________
68 Charger, 440SC, EFI, 6-speed
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-17-2015, 09:39 PM
lilcraigford lilcraigford is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I think a lot of people thrown by the styling were expecting more of an Mk1 GT40 shape. When I first saw pictures I scratched my head a little bit, especially over the cars proportions. Then this dawned on me:





The road-going Mk3 GT40 suffered from the same issue. Clearly part of the GT40 bloodline but oddly proportioned. Compared to the Mk1/Mk2 the Mk3 looks "too long" due to lengthened rear and front overhangs as well as elongated headlights. Looking at the '05/'06 GT next to the '17 GT yields the same effect, for me at least. As Ford has moved away from full-blown retro with the Mustang, I wonder if the new GT took some subtle queues from the Mk3 as a way of evolving GT as a whole.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-19-2015, 06:45 AM
GrabberGT's Avatar
GrabberGT GrabberGT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Fort Worth TX
Posts: 674
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I see the new GT as a road version of this with GT40 styling cues. The airfoils on the side of the GT disguise the teardrop shape some.

__________________
Chris

Its not a Vega!!!!

Total Cost Involved - Total Control Products - Gateway Performance - Fatman - MaverickMan Carbon
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-19-2015, 09:44 AM
BMR Sales's Avatar
BMR Sales BMR Sales is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,327
Thanks: 475
Thanked 1,469 Times in 1,104 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrabberGT View Post
I see the new GT as a road version of this with GT40 styling cues. The airfoils on the side of the GT disguise the teardrop shape some.

I don't - The Ford DP bodies look horrible compared to the Corvettes. They are almost Spec-cars with different front end treatments. I always thought the Ford DP should have looked like a GT40 Type IV.

Remember that next Year Ganassi is giving up the DP's to run a FGT in a lower class & will be taking it to LeMans

Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-19-2015, 09:47 AM
BMR Sales's Avatar
BMR Sales BMR Sales is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 8,327
Thanks: 475
Thanked 1,469 Times in 1,104 Posts
Default

The Rear Lights are hollow and this allows them to be used as Heat Extractors!

Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-19-2015, 11:31 AM
Lowfast's Avatar
Lowfast Lowfast is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Texan finally back in Texas!
Posts: 130
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The 2005 FGT's will always have a more classic and I think better aging appearance. To me those are still the ones to own. However, I like Fords new GT and it should pack tons of race bread technology. It would be awesome to see them take Lemans to celebrate the anniversary.
__________________
1965 Ford Falcon Hardtop - PT Build
TCI Supension | Team III Wheels | Ford 3v 4.6 & TR3650
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net