...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old 07-16-2011, 08:35 PM
mfain mfain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 453
Thanks: 76
Thanked 108 Times in 51 Posts
Default

You might try reading pages 3 and 4 of the article at the link below -- the part about the relationship of the upper and lower control arms and the tie rods. The tie rods need to be on a line from the outer pivot point (at the steering arm) and the instant center (the angle formed by the control arms -- see photo in the article). The length of the tie rod from the end of the rack to the steering arm is also described. If you vary much from these parameters, you will get toe in or toe out (bumpsteer) with ride height change, as Todd suggests. On the other hand, you can't change camber without a ride height change or steering input (caused by caster) unless something moves in one of the control arm pivot points (inner or outer). A change in camber would probably cause a change in toe. I think Todd is on the right track.. Even a small ride height change can produce big changes if the basic geometry is not right. Hope this helps.

Pappy

http://www.circletrack.com/chassiste..._tie_rods.html
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net