...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 04-27-2012, 12:56 AM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,723
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66SuperSport View Post
My Chevelle has had both a solid rear axle and an IRS and to me there is a huge difference in ride quality. The car had double adjustable shocks in both configurations and I will admit it was sprung a little on the stiff side to get it to work right on the track with the solid axle set up. The IRS on the other hand is sprung very soft, yet handles better with less body roll and a way better ride. I'll agree that if you want to do more of a bolt in type rear suspension the DSE QuadraLink is awesome, but if you can spend the money you will not be disappointed in the RS/IRS chassis.
Now you're just showing off I want an IRS in my RS chassis but I just don't have the extra $$
__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171

Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net