...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 01-01-2007, 05:29 AM
tyoneal's Avatar
tyoneal tyoneal is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,365
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Engine set back question

To All:

Have many of you built your car with the engine set back about six inch for better weight distribution? (69 Camaro)

My '33 has that so the 429 will fit right, but I don't see many people doing that with the 69 Camaro's.

Is it just to much hassle for the amount of improvement one gains?

What configuration would be the optimum placement for the drive train if you could have it anyway you wnat it?

That trick car Schwartz performance put together really seems to be set up correctly.

Has anyone done a mid-engine Camaro? (I know it's an idiotic question, but this group is very creative, and I'm always surprised by what people are trying)

Even Sacriligious thinking of putting a torque monster Diesil will probably eventually make itself into a 69 someday. Look at all the performance, "Banks" is getting. Those things rock and get good milage to boot.

I'm just think out loud.

Happy New Year to all of you!

Thanks,

Ty O'Neal
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net