...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2008, 10:02 AM
Ketzer's Avatar
Ketzer Ketzer is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Eads, TN.
Posts: 1,467
Thanks: 393
Thanked 184 Times in 122 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaromax View Post

Does anyone have a picture of a Duramax and Allison together from the side so I can compare heights of the pans?

I just took a look under mine, the tranny pan is actually lower than the oil pan. Granted, I have the oversized pan on mine but I bet even the stocker is still as low as the oil pan. Dunno how you could dry sump the tranny?

Jeff-
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-27-2008, 10:13 PM
Camaromax Camaromax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for bringing up the Impala again. I forgot about that one. I had seen it before but had not really looked closely at the pics. It looks to me that if the turbo and air intake had been relocated it might have actually fit under the stock hood of the Impala. Either way it looks like the oilpan fit with some notching of the crossmember. So it seems it might actually be easier to fit in their than I first thought. Any body know how close a sbc comes to the hood of one of those Impalas? Just so I can compare to the Camaro.

I there would be room over the fender well or in front of the engine to put the turbo. That appears to be the big obstacle on the Impala. I would like to keep the hood down to about a 2in cowl if possible.

Thanks again
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2008, 11:06 PM
Camaromax Camaromax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Hey found this

http://www.trucktrend.com/features/t...nes/index.html

They put a Duramax and Allison into a 1989 1500 4x4 and ended with a curb weight of 4700lbs. Sounds to me like the Durmax isnt as heavy as I first thought.

After looking at pictures of them on Banks website The block does not look all that different from the LS engines. Although it is probably a little beefier and i am sure the heads are heavier than ls heads, I think it maybe close in weight to a big block chevy with iron heads, which isnt that great but isnt that bad at the same time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2008, 11:09 PM
Camaromax Camaromax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ha I should of looked just a second longer. I found a weight for the engine.

Here it is http://www.pickuptrucks.com/html/gmheavy2.html

836lbs for those who dont want to follow the link.

Now to find the weight of the trans.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2008, 02:08 AM
deuce_454's Avatar
deuce_454 deuce_454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,612
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

i have a 66 impala SS, took out the 327 about 7 years ago so i cant help you on the sbc question.. but it isnt that tall i have a std deck BBC in mine and can fit a 4 inch aircleaner with a drop base, but only with a torquer2 intake... running a dualplane and there is only room for an oem aircleaner or some open element edelbrock crap... so id say it isnt much taller than a 1.gen..
__________________
Elwood:We're 105 miles from Chicago, we have a full tank of gas, half pack of cigarettes, it's dark out and we're wearing sunglasses.
Jake: Hit it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-28-2008, 02:14 AM
deuce_454's Avatar
deuce_454 deuce_454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,612
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

but looking at the picture on your last link the tranny looks BIG.... you would propably need to either remote locate the tranny filter and raise the tranny oilpan (perhaps an electric scavenge pump and a gravity feed oil reservoir to the pickup in the tranny pan will buy you some inches) or mount the whole engine/tranny horizontally and have a BIG transmission hump/tunnel
__________________
Elwood:We're 105 miles from Chicago, we have a full tank of gas, half pack of cigarettes, it's dark out and we're wearing sunglasses.
Jake: Hit it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-28-2008, 11:36 AM
Camaromax Camaromax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Yeah the transmission pan will hang kinda low but they made it fit in the Impalla. Here is the link to a pic of the pan in the Impalla. http://www.dieselpowermag.com/featur.../photo_06.html

Right now I am thinking just leave the pans as they are and make it fit. But I dont want to run a huge cowl hood either. Like I said only about 2in hopefully.

Probably going to take up some interior space but I guess we will have to see.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net