...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



View Poll Results: Which rear suspension?
DSE's Quadra Link 104 45.61%
Alstons G Bar 77 33.77%
Leave the GW Cat 5's 17 7.46%
Just pull the trigger go Lateral Dynamics 30 13.16%
Voters: 228. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-28-2008, 01:25 PM
FreddieCougar's Avatar
FreddieCougar FreddieCougar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 235
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Actually, that is a production Chassisworks piece...those are the production finishes.
Tim
__________________
Tim McCain
[email protected]
instagram - timdrawscars

Last edited by FreddieCougar; 08-19-2009 at 06:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-28-2008, 06:33 PM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Also there are weld on lower brackets option available for a cleaner / non adapted look.

We have a few one order and will be putting one in my personal car in the next couple weeks. Cannot wait.
__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-28-2008, 06:33 PM
ItDoRun's Avatar
ItDoRun ItDoRun is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Zachary, Louisiana
Posts: 921
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Tim,
If I want to use my existing 12 bolt and not use the u-bolts provided, what provisions are there for weld on housing brackets for the lower arms?

Chris
__________________
Chris
1968 Camaro: DSE tubs and sub frame connectors, Chassisworks G-Link rear suspension, Speedtech upper and lower control arms, Chicane front coilover conversion with QA1's, Baer brakes, 18" Forgeline SO3's, Vintage Air, 6.0L LS 417 rwhp, 4L65E, Moser 12 Bolt w/3.73's....
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2391864

Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=19253
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-28-2008, 06:57 PM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

We already sold a couple kits with weld on brackets. $50 more for weld on brackets.
__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2008, 08:00 PM
MoparCar MoparCar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 245
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Mopar E-body please.........
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-28-2008, 08:44 PM
wedgehead wedgehead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Burleson Tx
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I second the E-body.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-29-2008, 10:35 AM
Marcus SC&C's Avatar
Marcus SC&C Marcus SC&C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: S.E. PA.
Posts: 169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Tim, straight from the horses mouth. Poor wording on my part, I meant to say that the welding and surface finishes of the install (including the car ie. rusty parts) weren`t done yet.

The weld on brackets are a great option for a cleaner look. They`re almost elegant.
You can also get the swaybar mounts (either style) for $50 without the bar if you want to leave your options open but don`t want to cough up the extra for the whole bar now. Personally I love that adj. rate bar! The axle mounted bar with its billet arms is really pretty and functional too but tuning options make me all warm and fuzzy.

Maybe Tim can give some more info on other applications but last I talked to Chris there are plans to do a G-Link for all of the G-Bar applications so E-Body should be coming. Knowing how long this stuff takes to do right I suspect it may be a while though. In the mean time the existing G-Bar for those cars is a darn good system in it`s own right and we`ll be offering billet/greasable pivot ball double adj. arms for them like those on the G-Link. We have a Hellwig adj. rate rear swaybar for them as well. That gets you pretty close to a G-Link. Mark SC&C
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-13-2008, 11:22 AM
Marcus SC&C's Avatar
Marcus SC&C Marcus SC&C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: S.E. PA.
Posts: 169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Just a quick update on the G-Link. They`re shipping which is very cool! We also just became aware of a clearance issue when using the bolt on G-Link LCA brackets in mini tubbed applications. Some big mini tubb only wheel dia. and backspace combinations may not clear the lower coil over mounting bracket. The arms and brackets are much more beefy and they added additional adjustment holes so the brackets are a bit larger than the original G-Bar. If you want to run minitubbs just select the weld on lower arm mounts. They can be installed further inboard for clearance and Chassisworks is already working on instructions and an offset bushing kit for the front of the lower arms to preserve the correct geometry. The upper coilover mounts have plenty of holes for adjustment so no changes will be required there at all. CW will be doing at least one narrowed rear swaybar for minitubb applications and the adj. rate Hellwig rear bars should work as well. Thanks to Frank at Prodigy who`s helping Chassisworks with the fittment details on his mini tubbed cars. Mark SC&C
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-22-2008, 02:20 PM
Tony@AirRideTech Tony@AirRideTech is offline
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 163
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wedgehead View Post
I second the E-body.


http://www.ridetech.com/products/Chr...es-824-75.html
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net