...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-12-2009, 09:25 PM
TonyG TonyG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 253
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I think GM needs to rethink the Pontiac decision and scrap Buick.
__________________
65 Malibu "Liberator"
91 Fox Coupe SSP "Emma"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-13-2009, 09:17 AM
Damn True's Avatar
Damn True Damn True is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyG View Post
I think GM needs to rethink the Pontiac decision and scrap Buick.
Why?

Buick makes money.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-13-2009, 10:08 AM
3SuperSports's Avatar
3SuperSports 3SuperSports is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 71
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I finally saw the new Camaro in person. I haven't been a fan of the concept and CAN say I like it better than I did, but still not enough to want one. Maybe it's one of those cars that takes a few years to grow on you. I don't like the high "belt line" it makes the body look thick. I got in the passengers side, you know how it is, getting in a low sitting car, well add to the fact that as I'm falling in, I have to lean forward so I don't hit my head on the roof edge (I'm 6'-1"). When in the car the dash/bottom edge of the windows seems very high. I did not test drive, so I'm not sure if that perception has any real bearing on visibility, but I can't imagine my 5'-0" tall wife enjoyng driving one.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-13-2009, 10:36 AM
E.rodz's Avatar
E.rodz E.rodz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: st. paul mn.
Posts: 649
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

i think its just another gm. mis in my book. sutch an awsome drivetrain. but interior is butt ugly.the car has potential but is pretty lame duck styling. ther are some renderings out there that look great maybe gm. can learn somthing from them. i went to the auto show just to see the re release of the gto. and you could have kicked me in the nuts and pained me no less. to se sutch a awsome drivetrain and sutch a lame body with tiny little tires and no styling to see at all was very disapointing. the price on the camaro is to much for just a car with potential.you would have to spend another 10 grand just to get it to look decent. been a fan of chevy's for ever. but they have lost me on this one.just an opinion. i would take a first gen body with the lsx tech anyday.
__________________
my name is Eric Hokenson I have a dream of building ten of the coolest hot rods out of my home shop wish me luck I am going to need it! - more pics on my web site www.erodzcustoms.com this is just for fun and i am NOT looking for any more work!
Thank you supporting sponsors! without you guys there is no way I could do this myself !
Modern automotive performance,Ring bros.,Yank convertors,extreme drive systems,Cj tunes,race coatings stainless works,Modern Automotive Performance.all of these shops have the experience to get your car to the top.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-14-2009, 09:50 PM
CamaroPat's Avatar
CamaroPat CamaroPat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: upstate, NY
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'm a GM guy through and through, but I can see why the company's going bust. Just as the Camaro was a late answer to the Mustang at its inception, the new retro styling attempt we see now is just a very late answer to the hugely popular new retro Mustang. In the '60s, the Camaro showed up late, but was a superior car, now it's just late. The styling is attractive, but not great. GM just doesn't get retro styling, look at the SSR, ugly as homemade sin and utterly pointless. I hope the Camaro doesn't feel like other GM vehicles, as far as interior quality and fit and finish are concerned. The interior of nearly every GM car produced from the late '80s on falls to pieces in about a decade and that's something people remember. Look at new Cadillacs, the interiors look and feel extremely cheap! Better materials are used on base model Accords and Jettas. Nobody will spend $40k on something that feels like you could crush it with your bare hand. I pray that the Camaro and all other GM products sell well, for the sake of the company. As far as discontinuing Buick, let it be known that Buick is the best selling car in China! With a sales market that big just opening up, let's capitalize and sel them as many of our cars as they'll take, before they start building them, of course.
__________________
Great success rarely comes without the risk of great failure. '81 Camaro, 350, Edelbrock 750, headers, 4 speed, '97 Buick Park Ave Ultra, Supercharged 3.8L V6
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-14-2009, 11:25 PM
camaro2nv's Avatar
camaro2nv camaro2nv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Roseville
Posts: 687
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

GM really lost out on this one. EVERYONE knew what the car was going to look like for two years before it came out. It lost the shock value.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-14-2009, 11:41 PM
skatinjay27's Avatar
skatinjay27 skatinjay27 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: las vegas, NV
Posts: 1,778
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro2nv View Post
GM really lost out on this one. EVERYONE knew what the car was going to look like for two years before it came out. It lost the shock value.
yeah and us car folk have know for over 5 years...lol
__________________
AJ

1970 1/2 rs z28...pro-touring?...i wish...soon?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net