...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-26-2009, 04:19 PM
snowskater6996's Avatar
snowskater6996 snowskater6996 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 66
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Not sure how much I lowered it but the wheel sizes are 18x10 rear and 17x8 front.
__________________
"Nightmare"- 1972 Dodge Challenger
Daily Driver- 1994 Trans Am
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-26-2009, 06:46 PM
BritishGreen68 BritishGreen68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PDX oregon
Posts: 320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well there is nothing wrong with a back halved camaro. That just means you can run 18x12's and do a nice 4 link setup designed towards handling if it doesn't already have one.. Bad Penny started out that way (not sure if it has a full back half) but i would say it would be nice to start with a car that's already tubbed and back halved.. Just do a subframe and nice front suspension and a killer set of wheels and tires..
__________________
Chris


Under construction-British Green 68 Camaro-
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-26-2009, 06:55 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Since we can't see your Camaro in this thread -- We can't really compare your trading stock...

I'd just beware of the dreaded RUST in these older Mopar bodies -- IMHO they were MUCH worse than the similar Camaro or Ford... Mopars just seem to be really rust prone...

Oh -- I can hear the Mopar guys already... They're lining up to tackle that statement.

Having said the above - I'd take that Mopar for a PT build over your 67 Camaro - just because they're always kool -- and have such great lines.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-26-2009, 09:13 PM
70rs's Avatar
70rs 70rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Washington State
Posts: 3,683
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Since we can't see your Camaro in this thread -- We can't really compare your trading stock...

I'd just beware of the dreaded RUST in these older Mopar bodies -- IMHO they were MUCH worse than the similar Camaro or Ford... Mopars just seem to be really rust prone...

Oh -- I can hear the Mopar guys already... They're lining up to tackle that statement.

Having said the above - I'd take that Mopar for a PT build over your 67 Camaro - just because they're always kool -- and have such great lines.



Nice save Greg! Those Mopar guys can be a tough crowd.....


Do you have pictures of both cars involved in the trade?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2009, 05:23 AM
cwylie cwylie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 400
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts
Default

My Camaro
Attached Images
    

Last edited by cwylie; 10-27-2009 at 05:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-27-2009, 05:36 AM
cwylie cwylie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 400
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts
Default

The challenger- Almost all origonal car.

Bad- A/C was taken out..... well most of it from what I understand
Not the origonal color and he said there is some paint flaws on the bottom of the car.
I believe the car was origonally lime green from what he says there is some evidence.
120k miles on the origonal motor

My car-

Almost perfect paint you could never tell the car was any other color
Brand new crate 355

Bad- Needs to be rewried... has no turn signals and a draw on the battery while sitting.
Attached Images
     
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-27-2009, 07:44 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

So this might be hard to "say" -- and have it come out right -- I'm not picking on either car - I'm just going to be comparing the advantage or disadvantage of the two cars. Which is what you're really asking about.

IMHO both cars need to be complete re-dos if you want to make them real PT cars... So in that case - they appear to be about on equal footing... Paint doesn't count - since if you're going to do a REAL PT car - you're going to be modding just about every facet of the running gear - which means lots of hot sparks flying - which means PAINT JOB...

Complete wiring in either car - equal $$ and work

Complete interior both cars - equal $$ and work

Tires and wheels both cars - equal $$ and work

Vintage A/C both cars - equal $$ and work

Any "savings" might come from some form of reusable engine parts - block / heads / intake etc... and rear end parts... raw housing - axles - gears.

SO NOW IT COMES DOWN TO WHICH ONE YOU WANT TO BURY YOURSELF IN.

If you just wanted to Clean them up and drive 'em -- that's a completely different assessment and you'd have to see them in person in order to do that.

Here is a piece of advice -- and lord knows I'm free with that!! LOL

I tell people that ask me. It costs the same amount of money - and in many cases MORE to do an "orphan car" - versus a "popular" car. Say some odd 60's Buick vs a 60's Mustang or Camaro... The popular cars have lots of bolt on repop parts etc... and it's a competitive market... And when you get all done and want to sell it - I'd put my money in that popular car vs the orphan car.. because the market just isn't there for the oddball stuff... So unless you have lots of money and just "want one" - then stick to the normal marketable cars... Now I'm not talking RARE collector stuff here... that's a different can of worms. BUT both of the cars you're dealing with are great candidates for projects or make overs... great body styles etc... so I'd just pick the one that make my heart go pitter patter.

Plan your work - and work your plan.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-27-2009, 01:56 PM
wedged wedged is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 405
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70rs View Post
Nice save Greg! Those Mopar guys can be a tough crowd.....

Get the challenger, camaros are like belly buttons. If I wasn't a tough Mopar guy, I'd never be able to say that in a mostly camaro environment.

(ducks & covers)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-27-2009, 02:11 PM
70rs's Avatar
70rs 70rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Washington State
Posts: 3,683
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wedged View Post
Get the challenger, camaros are like belly buttons. If I wasn't a tough Mopar guy, I'd never be able to say that in a mostly camaro environment.

(ducks & covers)


I like them both. But I have a real soft spot for a nice '68 Camaro so that is what I would choose. Even though there are so many out there and it is getting harder to do one that really stands out. Which one REALLY gets your attention? Which one do YOU want to drive? It's your car and your money, do what you want. Either way you will have a very cool car.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-27-2009, 03:17 PM
cwylie cwylie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 400
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts
Default

There are alot more option for parts for the Camaro.... I dunno guess I am leaning toward keeping the Camaro.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net