...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2010, 06:29 AM
AWDPete's Avatar
AWDPete AWDPete is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Baraboo, WI
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I believe I have narrowed down the list of needs/wants pretty well but I could still use some suggestions on the following:

Coilover LCA - strong and light

Adjustable hollow anti-roll bar

Full coilover, not a car specific fitment. Varishock, Afco, ????

I understand that with the stock sub the wheel and tire will be a little narrower than can be fitted with an aftermarket sub. What is generally considered to be the max size fitment?

Rocks!
__________________
PeteH
Baraboo, WI

https://lateral-g.net/forums/gara...vehicle&id=121
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2010, 01:36 PM
James OLC's Avatar
James OLC James OLC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,459
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AWDPete View Post
I believe I have narrowed down the list of needs/wants pretty well but I could still use some suggestions on the following:

Coilover LCA - strong and light

Adjustable hollow anti-roll bar

Full coilover, not a car specific fitment. Varishock, Afco, ????

I understand that with the stock sub the wheel and tire will be a little narrower than can be fitted with an aftermarket sub. What is generally considered to be the max size fitment?

Rocks!

Control Arms - SpeedTech high clearance (assuming from your final question that you looking for the largest possible front wheel/tire)

Anti-roll bar - Hellwig Products has some great adjustable hollow bars

Coilover - budget dependant but I would take a hard look at the new RideTech shocks.

On my stock subframe I am running 275/35-18s on a 9.5" rim. I think that there is room for a 285 with a little bit of work.

I think that the OneLapCamaro shows some of the potential of a stock subframe. While I can see advantages to an aftermarket sub (mostly wigh respect to tire size and weight) I don't think that a well built stock subframe is a major handicap.
__________________
James
1967 Camaro RS - The OLC
1967 Camaro RS - Recycler
1969 Camaro - Dusty
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2010, 09:40 PM
CarlC CarlC is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 641
Thanks: 12
Thanked 112 Times in 37 Posts
Default

Who in their right mind would put a 285 front tire on a stock subframe 1st gen?

Plans often change after the first "completion" and may effect your long-term outlook. I like reversible. It allows for new things down the road.

Don't worry about the stock wheel bearings. They are just fine for what we are doing.
__________________
http:www.vaporworx.com

Last edited by CarlC; 06-05-2010 at 09:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2010, 09:47 PM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlC View Post
Who in their right mind would put a 285 front tire on a stock subframe 1st gen?

Oh, I know, I know - no one!
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2010, 03:39 PM
coolwelder62's Avatar
coolwelder62 coolwelder62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vinland Ks.
Posts: 4,315
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Speedway motor's has some budget tubular a-arms for the 1st.gen's around 650.00 for upper's & lower's.They also have quick ratio steering boxes alot less than everybody else. they have springs, afco shocks,brackets.Alot of useable parts at lower prices.www.speedwaymotors.com or 1-800-979-0122.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-06-2010, 09:38 PM
wrighton wrighton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Great info. Really helpful. For those of us upgrading our stock subframes.

James you want to elaborate on how that 9.5 inch wheel fits with the stock subframe?

Looking at speedtechs web site I do not see a seperate reference for high clearance arms other than with the complete subframe set up? are there two different ones or are they same?

And do the speedtech and hothckins arms have the corrected geometry built in, and the Gull mod is not needed? am I getting this right.

So many decisions, again thanks for helping us narrow them down.

Pricing? Is the complete Chicane kit 5-6K, Great kit as I was reading but close to a full subframe cost?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2010, 05:05 AM
AWDPete's Avatar
AWDPete AWDPete is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Baraboo, WI
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

While I am learning too, I do believe that none of the arms will correct what the GS mod does. To bring the car up to modern geometry specs you need to do onlyONE of the following along with geometry corrected arms:

A: do the Gulstrand mod

B: use tall balljoints, although I have seen both upper and lower extended bj - and at differant lengths. Not sure what is 'ideal'.

C: use the ATS tall spindle

Is this correct guys?
__________________
PeteH
Baraboo, WI

https://lateral-g.net/forums/gara...vehicle&id=121
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2010, 08:56 AM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AWDPete View Post
While I am learning too, I do believe that none of the arms will correct what the GS mod does. To bring the car up to modern geometry specs you need to do onlyONE of the following along with geometry corrected arms:

A: do the Gulstrand mod

B: use tall balljoints, although I have seen both upper and lower extended bj - and at differant lengths. Not sure what is 'ideal'.

C: use the ATS tall spindle

Is this correct guys?
Essentially yes. UCAs have some caster built in already making it easier to get to a good performance alignment. A good aftermarket LCA will reduce if not eliminate tire rub caused by running lots of caster (which moves the wheel to the rear of the wheelwell) by moving the lower balljoint forward in the wheelwell. Other than that, after-market arms are pretty.
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-12-2010, 02:40 PM
frojoe's Avatar
frojoe frojoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 296
Thanks: 18
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AWDPete View Post
While I am learning too, I do believe that none of the arms will correct what the GS mod does. To bring the car up to modern geometry specs you need to do onlyONE of the following along with geometry corrected arms:

A: do the Gulstrand mod

B: use tall balljoints, although I have seen both upper and lower extended bj - and at differant lengths. Not sure what is 'ideal'.

C: use the ATS tall spindle

Is this correct guys?
Tall ball joints or tall spindles achieve the same thing as the Guldstrand Mod.

The idea behind all of these is to get more negative camber as the wheel travels up through the suspension... this is done by increasing the downward angle of the UCA (in towards the subframe) relative to the LCA.

a) Tall ball joints move the ball joint end of the UCA up, steepening the UCA angle.

b) Tall spindle with stock-height ball joint also raises the ball joint end and steepens the UCA angle.

c) Guldstrand Mod lowers the cross-shaft mounting point on the UCA, thus steepening the UCA angle.

I think it'd generally be a BAD idea to combine any of a, b, or c because it would steepen the UCA angle far too much and make the handling twitchy and drastically reduce the tire contact patch, since the tire would tilt inwards (negative camber) so much.

But I'm not an expert, just what I've come to understand thru lots of reading.

I fully welded my stock subframe and have SpeedTech UCA/LCA as well as QA1 coilover conversion, Hotchkis hollow 1.125" swaybar, and Guldstrand Mod.

I also boxed in the very front cross member support, not sure if it'd do much but I could flex the c-channel by hand so any little bit could help torsional rigidity...

http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/11903865-post169.html
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/11919822-post170.html
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/11929393-post171.html

Cheers!
-Joe
__________________
Joe
1972 Nova with twin 6466's and T56 Magnum in the works. Speedtech, Ridetech, Wilwoods etc. Swap thread --> http://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=980909


Last edited by frojoe; 06-12-2010 at 02:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2010, 07:06 AM
AWDPete's Avatar
AWDPete AWDPete is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Baraboo, WI
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by coolwelder62 View Post
Speedway motor's has some budget tubular a-arms for the 1st.gen's around 650.00 for upper's & lower's.They also have quick ratio steering boxes alot less than everybody else. they have springs, afco shocks,brackets.Alot of useable parts at lower prices.www.speedwaymotors.com or 1-800-979-0122.
Thanks for the tip! Don't know why but it seems circle track/Nascar parts are less expensive? I have one of there catalogs from years ago but forgot about them
__________________
PeteH
Baraboo, WI

https://lateral-g.net/forums/gara...vehicle&id=121
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net