...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-24-2011, 10:21 AM
Blake Foster's Avatar
Blake Foster Blake Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 2,526
Thanks: 6
Thanked 101 Times in 44 Posts
Default

maybe try adding a bump stop on the shock shaft.
that damage to the shock "looks" like it has Topped out, extended too far???
to pull it appart like that??
__________________
Blake Foster
www.speedtechperformance.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-24-2011, 10:34 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

I agree with Blake, it looks to be under extension. Especially since you said you had 3/4" of shock travel left after the event.(Assuming by the oring position) You really need a stop under your upper control arm that it can rest on around full shock extension.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-24-2011, 10:38 AM
Bow Tie 67's Avatar
Bow Tie 67 Bow Tie 67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NW burbs, IL
Posts: 525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killer69 View Post
maybe try adding a bump stop on the shock shaft.
that damage to the shock "looks" like it has Topped out, extended too far???
to pull it appart like that??
Yep extended to far? or just loosened up and was pushed out by internal pressure.
__________________
Matt

Project: " Chain Reaction "

A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.



1969 RS Camaro, L92 T56, Chassisworks sub, Quadra-Link, Bear, Ford 9".
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-25-2011, 08:28 AM
clill's Avatar
clill clill is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,612
Thanks: 70
Thanked 1,859 Times in 653 Posts
Default

At full travel you don't want the threads in that shock to have to do the work of holding it together. You need some kind of stop. At full travel is it the shock that stops it ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-27-2011, 07:44 AM
Bow Tie 67's Avatar
Bow Tie 67 Bow Tie 67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NW burbs, IL
Posts: 525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clill View Post
At full travel you don't want the threads in that shock to have to do the work of holding it together. You need some kind of stop. At full travel is it the shock that stops it ?
Yes it is.
__________________
Matt

Project: " Chain Reaction "

A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.



1969 RS Camaro, L92 T56, Chassisworks sub, Quadra-Link, Bear, Ford 9".
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-27-2011, 08:03 AM
clill's Avatar
clill clill is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,612
Thanks: 70
Thanked 1,859 Times in 653 Posts
Default

Not sure how to put a rubber snubber up top on your setup to limit travel. Early Shelby Mustangs used a cable to limit the travel.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-27-2011, 10:12 AM
Bow Tie 67's Avatar
Bow Tie 67 Bow Tie 67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NW burbs, IL
Posts: 525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thats what I'm thinking. Currently I'm using AN bolts to mount the shocks. They are longer than needed so I can add a cable or strap between them.
__________________
Matt

Project: " Chain Reaction "

A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.



1969 RS Camaro, L92 T56, Chassisworks sub, Quadra-Link, Bear, Ford 9".
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-27-2011, 11:29 AM
wmhjr wmhjr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clill View Post
At full travel you don't want the threads in that shock to have to do the work of holding it together. You need some kind of stop. At full travel is it the shock that stops it ?
So what about the shocks on the back? The threads fully support everything all of the time, right? And the rear end is far heavier. What makes that different? I realize the spring rates are different.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-29-2011, 10:02 AM
Bow Tie 67's Avatar
Bow Tie 67 Bow Tie 67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NW burbs, IL
Posts: 525
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Earlier in the year I took a good look at the new Ridetech coil over shocks and really liked what they have to offer. As your average working stiff I could not justify the cost of changing a component that's doing its job, so it was only a passing thought. Well things change, and now I have a decision to make, have mine rebuilt or try another brand. I made a call to Ridetech and my mind was made up, I decided to try their new coil-overs.

I installed my new single adjustable shocks yesterday and took a short ride. So far so good, the car feels more responsive, the big test will be at the Heidts challenge in two weeks. I will leave feedback once the event is over.

In the mean time here are some pics. Due to the difference in shock design, the Ridetech shocks were more difficult to install. For one they actually have a nitrogen charge, so the shock wont stay collapsed and the mount bolt center line to shock body is a shorter distance. At first I thought I might have to grind for clearance on the lower control arm, but soon found if I pushed the suspension down as far as it will go I could set the shocks in and install the bolts. I double checked full suspension travel without the coils to make sure no binding would occur. SCORE !! there is enough clearance.

I'm still working on some suspension stops, but have faith in these shocks as they have real bumpers vs a 1/4" o-ring!!

clearance to lower control arm



Installed pic


__________________
Matt

Project: " Chain Reaction "

A.K.A. " BIG " by wife, biatch in garage.



1969 RS Camaro, L92 T56, Chassisworks sub, Quadra-Link, Bear, Ford 9".
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-29-2011, 10:21 AM
wmhjr wmhjr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Matt, I don't think the 1/4" o-ring is a bump stop. I considered it a travel measuring tool and nothing else. You can see how much compression you're getting based on how far up the 0-ring gets pushed up on the shaft.

But I'm still curious as to why there should be a difference front to rear. I have Varishock double adjustables and was also a little concerned about the shock having to support the full extended spring rate in the front since the shaft isn't quite long enough for the a-arms to be fully extended (ie, car on left with wheels at full droop). I asked, and got the question - "what do you think happens in the back?" which made me realize what was going on.

The only thing supporting my rear axle when the car is on the lift (or if a wheel comes off the ground while driving) is the rear shock. That's the normal mode in an a-body coil spring suspension. The spring rate is roughly 1/3 of the front spring rate, but the weight of the rear assembly, etc probably compensates quite a bit.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net