...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Trucks
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:56 PM
Bryce Bryce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The forward torque arm mount defines the IC. I would aim for an IC that returns close to 100% A/S but somewhere about 70%. With a torque arm you are not concerned about brake hop as much as you would be with a 3 or 4 link. Make the shorter outside links horizontal.

I personally like the slider style forward torque arm mount rather than the dogbone.

I see no reason why a truck could not use a torque arm. Weight is an issue and the torque arm would need to be much stonger for a truck, especially since the t/a is longer.

Dont forget, you still need a lateral locating device, panhard or watts. I would prefer watts in this situation so you minimize the side load on the front torque arm mount.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2011, 07:17 PM
street3285 street3285 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 297
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You don't want my opinion, only Bryce's.... jk man.

Thanks for the clarification Bryce. I saw them as being pretty similar in design. But anyhow, thanks for the information. I just saw the 2-link being a little easier to install, but after your explanation, the torque arm may not be that bad. I agree, a 2-link is not ideal for a track setup.

BTW, I dig those 2dr 2wd tahoes. They are sweet.
__________________
Travis
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2011, 06:46 PM
Tig Tig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryce View Post
The forward torque arm mount defines the IC. I would aim for an IC that returns close to 100% A/S but somewhere about 70%. With a torque arm you are not concerned about brake hop as much as you would be with a 3 or 4 link. Make the shorter outside links horizontal.

I personally like the slider style forward torque arm mount rather than the dogbone.

I see no reason why a truck could not use a torque arm. Weight is an issue and the torque arm would need to be much stonger for a truck, especially since the t/a is longer.

Dont forget, you still need a lateral locating device, panhard or watts. I would prefer watts in this situation so you minimize the side load on the front torque arm mount.
Is the longer the TA the better?
I ask because the random center crossmember is roughly the same distance as the one pictured. Thats why I thought it would work out better.
A/S = ackerman steering correct?

Do you have an exampple of a slider style mount? I have never seen one.

The DOM I have is rather stout but, I am ordering some more of different sizes, square and rectangular. All thick wall.

I'm with you, watts all the way.
I'm going to be getting in touch with Fays2 for some components. I dont have much room and am more than likely going to have to make one to fit.

Thanks Bryce, I appreciate it very much.


Street,
I'm sorry I didnt mean to bump you like that. I had spoken with Bryce before and now he's rather talented in this department.
I'm diggin the 2drs too, hah.
Pictures are always nice This is how she's sittin right now. There's about 90lb or air in the bags out back to keep it at that level. I am installing the drop spindles and checking my a/s while I'm doing that. It droves like junk with it aired up. It a nicer ride with no air, just looks silly with the reversed rake going on, hah.


No air
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-26-2011, 08:07 AM
Bryce Bryce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tig View Post
Is the longer the TA the better?
I ask because the random center crossmember is roughly the same distance as the one pictured. Thats why I thought it would work out better.
A/S = ackerman steering correct?

Do you have an exampple of a slider style mount? I have never seen one.

The DOM I have is rather stout but, I am ordering some more of different sizes, square and rectangular. All thick wall.

I'm with you, watts all the way.
I'm going to be getting in touch with Fays2 for some components. I dont have much room and am more than likely going to have to make one to fit.

Thanks Bryce, I appreciate it very much.
A/S is anti-squat. I think TCI has the slider front mount. The longer the T/A the higher it will need to mounted in the truck to get the same A/S numbers. Since you will have a higher CG you will probably have a really low A/S percentage. Therefore, the rear end will squat upon acceleration. With a T/A I see no reason not to get as close to 100% A/S as packaging will allow. Since the T/A has a non migrating IC by design you should be able to have lots of suspension travel without lots of pinion angle change. Also with a longer T/A you will reduce your chances of having brake hop.

Sorry for the lack of organization of info I just spit up on the page. I havent had my coffee yet.

Good luck with your project.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-2011, 12:58 PM
Tig Tig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryce View Post
A/S is anti-squat. I think TCI has the slider front mount. The longer the T/A the higher it will need to mounted in the truck to get the same A/S numbers. Since you will have a higher CG you will probably have a really low A/S percentage. Therefore, the rear end will squat upon acceleration. With a T/A I see no reason not to get as close to 100% A/S as packaging will allow. Since the T/A has a non migrating IC by design you should be able to have lots of suspension travel without lots of pinion angle change. Also with a longer T/A you will reduce your chances of having brake hop.

Sorry for the lack of organization of info I just spit up on the page. I havent had my coffee yet.

Good luck with your project.

Hi Bryce,
Gatcha, that was my second guess, hah.
I have looked around and found a couple of different slider links. This was one that caught my eye.


Do you have any pointers on getting my A/S #s? Would it be the same as if I was going to measure for my foxbody?
I may go with a design similar to this for the length and hieght that you are talking about. Plus the fab work would be rather simple



No need to appologize, hah. How is fatherhood going? Must be a blast. I miss those days. It seemed like yesterday we had her and now she is 4. Man time flies. Never mind my 16 year old.

Thank you for everything Bryce, I really appreciate it.
Sam
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-05-2011, 08:17 PM
Bryce Bryce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tig View Post
Hi Bryce,
Gatcha, that was my second guess, hah.
I have looked around and found a couple of different slider links. This was one that caught my eye.


Do you have any pointers on getting my A/S #s? Would it be the same as if I was going to measure for my foxbody?
I may go with a design similar to this for the length and hieght that you are talking about. Plus the fab work would be rather simple



No need to appologize, hah. How is fatherhood going? Must be a blast. I miss those days. It seemed like yesterday we had her and now she is 4. Man time flies. Never mind my 16 year old.

Thank you for everything Bryce, I really appreciate it.
Sam
I just finished feeding her. She is sleeping on my chest right now, I am loving it!

Caluclate A/S the same way as a 4-link, using the rear tire contact patch, the CG and the IC. The IC is the pivot point of the torque arm.

I personally like the slider style rather than the dog bone style (like you have pictured).

I would go with a longer TA than you have shown. But that is dependent on packaging. Also offset it to the passenger side of the driveshaft if you can.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-05-2011, 08:18 PM
Bryce Bryce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 873
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

here is a link to a slider TA picture.

http://www.superchevy.com/technical/.../photo_14.html
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-07-2011, 02:25 PM
slow4dr's Avatar
slow4dr slow4dr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 556
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Here are some pics of the TCI slider fully compressed vs. fully extended
& also rotated






-J
__________________
'04 IS300 LS3/TR6060 swap in process
'89 Plymouth Colt GT - 411WHP, 2490lbs & 32mpg
'06 Magnum SRT8 - AFE S2, 3" Flowmaster catback, Diablo Predator (KIA by a drunk driver 10-25-13)
63 Nova 'Low Budget G-Machine' *SOLD*
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-24-2011, 09:00 PM
Tig Tig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryce View Post
I just finished feeding her. She is sleeping on my chest right now, I am loving it!

Caluclate A/S the same way as a 4-link, using the rear tire contact patch, the CG and the IC. The IC is the pivot point of the torque arm.

I personally like the slider style rather than the dog bone style (like you have pictured).

I would go with a longer TA than you have shown. But that is dependent on packaging. Also offset it to the passenger side of the driveshaft if you can.
Man, those were the days man. Seriously dont ever put her down, hold as much as you can. Before you know it she's going to be 4 then 14. Cherish it brother.

What are your thoughts on a truck arm? I know it was mentioned earlier on in the thread but, it was brought up in another thread and after looking at it, seems to be a little more stout, especially for the wieght of the Tahoe. The ease of installation compared to fabbing the mount for the rear section of the TA seems to be a bit more involved and space is a factor. Seeing that I dont have a Ford 9", making some sort of mounting bracket is going to be a hurtle. I had contacted HotRodtoHell and they can make a complete weld in truck. I'm just not sure. They say it can handle any abuse I can throw at it.
I would like to get some pros opinions before I consider diving.

Thanks again for the info, I appreciate it.
Happy Turkey Day
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net