...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Trucks
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-12-2012, 10:06 PM
454SSguy's Avatar
454SSguy 454SSguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 103
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wow, this is alot to take in for sure. I really wish I had access to the truck and could take some measurements.

Ok no crazy spacing on the UCA. That creates some problems. Without shorteing the UCA (which you said to stay away from) the UCA will have to run through the frame. I assume I can do this and just build a hole for each arm of the UCA to move through, but will take up lots of space on the top and bottom of where the frame is now. Doable but definitely on the little bit crazy side,

Another thought on this subject is do I need the UCA and LCA lengths to be the same or the effective lengths. With the UCA and LCA arms the same the UCA will have less effective length b/c it won't be parallel, so should it be longer than the LCA.

For camber angle, I was thinking between -1* and -2*. But I'd like to have a few degrees of adjustment. Any ideas on how to have some adjustability?

I also have a set of drop spindles for the truck. I had planned on not using them since the coilovers drop the truck about 3" in the front, which is not crazy but another 2" on top of that is getting to be alot. On the + side the drop spindles would drop the front but maintain the same suspension geometry, thereby raising the IC's and FRC (still below ground though) and lowering the CoG bringing them closer together. I couldn't say how much really without alot of measuring, which I can't do.

Sorry for the novel.


BTW bryce : Just realized why your name looked familiar. I watched alot of your videos on youtube. You care helped push me "over the edge". LOL Don't worry I won't tell the wife it was your fault.

Last edited by 454SSguy; 02-12-2012 at 10:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2012, 05:58 AM
454SSguy's Avatar
454SSguy 454SSguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 103
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Someone posted this on another forum I'm on. I made a couple of little tweaks to move the camber to -1.5* but left everything else alone. What do you guys think?

http://www.racingaspirations.com/sus...&bhy=250&scl=1

According to that I could see about 1 full degree of negative camber at about 30mm of droop. So I'd want to maybe use a little less static camber or is 2.5* total not to much?

Last edited by 454SSguy; 02-13-2012 at 06:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-05-2012, 08:21 PM
Barry Barry is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'm patiently waiting to see some pics of the actual work as I am going to 4-link my Sonoma with coil overs.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2012, 08:53 PM
454SSguy's Avatar
454SSguy 454SSguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 103
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well I've been doing some work. I've got the whole 4 link pretty much in but I cheaped out and went with some shorter bars. I don't like how the crossmember sits so I got some longer bars (30") and will be moving the crossmember forward about a foot or so. I'll post up some pics of the progress when I get done.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net