...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-04-2013, 12:11 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

I agree with the notion that slapping a tire on a wheel that is to small or on the smaller side of the range may be counter productive. I do however think the biggest tire on the front(Right width wheel) with a reasonable stagger is the best way to go. You notice the Vette/Viper have decreased their stagger and increased front width lately. These old muscle cars are nose heavy and they want to push. You'll find yourself continually looking for an increase in front grip while you own the car. You'll naturally have more lateral rear grip at your disposal which means you will be decreasing rear grip to get chassis balance. I'd say a smaller rear tire would net better side and forward bite due to a slightly more desirable spring rate/shock setting.

Don't get me wrong, I think you can get the car to handle nicely.
__________________
Todd
  #2  
Old 07-04-2013, 12:29 PM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,723
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
I agree with the notion that slapping a tire on a wheel that is to small or on the smaller side of the range may be counter productive. I do however think the biggest tire on the front(Right width wheel) with a reasonable stagger is the best way to go. You notice the Vette/Viper have decreased their stagger and increased front width lately. These old muscle cars are nose heavy and they want to push. You'll find yourself continually looking for an increase in front grip while you own the car. You'll naturally have more lateral rear grip at your disposal which means you will be decreasing rear grip to get chassis balance. I'd say a smaller rear tire would net better side and forward bite due to a slightly more desirable spring rate/shock setting.

Don't get me wrong, I think you can get the car to handle nicely.
I was probably still typing some of the post while yo were posting this. I believe the new Viper is 295/355 so the stagger is pretty similar to my 285/345.


I don't disagree that a 325 out back might not be a better handling choice but we will have to wait and see.

I've got a pretty big mass of sheet metal out back on my car so once I get the motor in it will be interesting to see what my scales tell me.

As I said tires are disposable. It will be interesting when I get out of building mode and not the more difficult part.

Tuning

Edit

And Todd I do appreciate your real world input on this since you lived through it when you built Payback.
__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171

  #3  
Old 07-04-2013, 01:08 PM
DBasher's Avatar
DBasher DBasher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 257
Thanked 273 Times in 80 Posts
Default

Saw this and thought of your build, pretty nice ride. I plan to stop in and talk with him next week and get some details on it, I know he drives it daily.


Dan
Attached Images
   
  #4  
Old 07-04-2013, 01:48 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,549
Thanks: 1,399
Thanked 819 Times in 620 Posts
Default

Good info and great looking wheels, Rob! I think you're taking the right approach to all this. It's going to be a great car.
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2000 BMW 540i/6 and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims
  #5  
Old 07-04-2013, 07:46 PM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,723
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DBasher View Post
Saw this and thought of your build, pretty nice ride. I plan to stop in and talk with him next week and get some details on it, I know he drives it daily.


Dan
Wow Dan that is a Cyclone Spoiler II with the Aero droop nose. King of Talladega and Daytona in it's day. Check out the front bumper. Ford actually took a rear bumper and put it on the front to act as an air dam due to it's taller height. Early splitter right there.
__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171

  #6  
Old 07-05-2013, 03:55 PM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69 View Post
I agree with the notion that slapping a tire on a wheel that is to small or on the smaller side of the range may be counter productive. I do however think the biggest tire on the front(Right width wheel) with a reasonable stagger is the best way to go. You notice the Vette/Viper have decreased their stagger and increased front width lately. These old muscle cars are nose heavy and they want to push. You'll find yourself continually looking for an increase in front grip while you own the car. You'll naturally have more lateral rear grip at your disposal which means you will be decreasing rear grip to get chassis balance. I'd say a smaller rear tire would net better side and forward bite due to a slightly more desirable spring rate/shock setting.

Don't get me wrong, I think you can get the car to handle nicely.
Couldn't agree more.
__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net