...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Brakes
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-28-2013, 01:31 PM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,723
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Sutton View Post
Hey Josh,



You don't need 16" rotors. I have designed brake systems with 5500# total braking torque utilizing 11-3/4" rotors front & rear. The main reason to increase rotor size is to increase the thermal capacity of the rotors to survive long races.

I never run a rotor larger than needed, because the rotational weight KILLS performance. It adds to unsprung weight ... making the suspensions job of controlling that wheel harder. And it adds to the rotating weight. Not only is the rotor heavier ... but you're moving it out on a bigger radius.

I cringe when I see guys spend $1200 a wheel to shave 2-4# off ... then add rotors that weigh 6-8# more.

I learned long ago, if we cool the rotor properly, we can run a little less mass in the rotor ... so it's lighter. For this advantage ... I make cooling the rotors a priority.



[/COLOR]
Guilty as charged.

You see a lot of oversized rotors in the PT world because of the aesthetic value of filling the wheel. Many of us know better and still commit the crime.

I fell victim but reading this reminds me why I really wanted to run smaller rotors out back.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Sutton View Post
Hi Dave,

I have worked with AP calipers a LOT ... but I am not familiar with those part #s, other than knowing they're 6-piston calipers.

Two questions:
1. What is/was their intended design purpose?
2. Can you measure the piston sizes & we'll run some calcs?


.
Technical questions for Flash, this should be good.
__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-28-2013, 04:39 PM
carbuff's Avatar
carbuff carbuff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,321
Thanks: 18
Thanked 24 Times in 17 Posts
Default

I have found the solution for all of our braking concerns! And it's cheap too!!!

Brembo Red Disc Brake Caliper Covers

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-28-2013, 04:49 PM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carbuff View Post
I have found the solution for all of our braking concerns! And it's cheap too!!!

Brembo Red Disc Brake Caliper Covers


That is hilarious.

I'm sure they're licensed by Brembo ... NOT.


.
__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-28-2013, 05:18 PM
Track Junky's Avatar
Track Junky Track Junky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,469
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Default

This is great stuff guys.

I think I'm just going to add a "Thanks Ron" to my sig.
__________________
Gaetano Cosentino
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-28-2013, 06:20 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 159 Times in 105 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Sutton View Post
Hi Dave,

I have worked with AP calipers a LOT ... but I am not familiar with those part #s, other than knowing they're 6-piston calipers.

Two questions:
1. What is/was their intended design purpose?
2. Can you measure the piston sizes & we'll run some calcs?


.
I got these from James Shipka as they were used on his One Lap Camaro a couple years before he switched. Their intended purpose is dual street/track. I have the slotted-only version (not drilled). Here are the links he sent me:

http://www.brake-pros.com/product_fi...0S%7Ebroch.pdf
http://www.brake-pros.com/product_fi...0S%7Ebroch.pdf

Piston sizes (Hey Rob, look at that!) we measured to be as follows:

1.05 / 1.05 in the rear and 1.5 / 1.25 / 1.05 in the front.

They also came with some Mintex Xtreme and Raybestos pads. Not sure which we will try out first.

After some discussions with a couple people I was planning on starting with 3/4 / 3/4 MC bores.

Thanks Ron

Quote:
Originally Posted by FETorino View Post
Guilty as charged.

You see a lot of oversized rotors in the PT world because of the aesthetic value of filling the wheel. Many of us know better and still commit the crime.

I fell victim but reading this reminds me why I really wanted to run smaller rotors out back.



Yep. Nothing looks worse than an 11" rotor inside a 20" wheel.

But then a lot of this talk is really helping to validate that form can be trumped by function and then form can actually be aesthetically appealing because of it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by FETorino View Post




Technical questions for Flash, this should be good.
hey Roberto..... see this post by your new Crew Chief below. He has posted this more than once.... FYI.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Sutton View Post

6. I want people to ask questions. There are no stupid questions
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-28-2013, 06:46 PM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Dave,

You didn't give me all the details to work with, so I "assumed" a 6-1 pedal ratio & worked up a chart with 13" rotors & 14" rotors. If you have different details, let me know what they are & I'll plug them into my calcs.

Also, since I don't know what pads you're going to run, I adjusted the pad CoF until I got the 14" rotor version to about 4000# braking force. That will require pads in the .52 CoF at the temperature range you'll use them at. That is the lower end of race pads. You may want less braking force on the street.

For less braking force, go to a pad with a lower CoF. For more braking force, go higher on the CoF.

Attached Images
 
__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-28-2013, 10:28 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 159 Times in 105 Posts
Default

Thanks Ron.

Yes, 6:1 on the pedal ratio and 14" front and rear rotors.

I need to see if I can get an exact number/model # of the brake pads I got. I was also considering going with Carbotech XP-12 and/or XP-10 pads. I used them on my previous Wilwood setup (XP-10 front / XP-8 rear) and liked them.

Any experience with them?
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-28-2013, 10:51 PM
67goatman455 67goatman455 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 258
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'm still completely baffled that the brakes on my 99' Trans Am are better than a C6 Z06. Would the braking force be atleast somewhat equal to the LS1 calipers compared to the Z06 after having the "appropriate/OE spec" master cylinder bores, boost assist, and pedal ratio etc?
__________________
Scott

1967 GTO, LS2 T56

WILWOOD FORGELINE RIDETECH
$10k Budget driver/ track car

Last edited by 67goatman455; 07-28-2013 at 10:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net