...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-29-2013, 07:19 PM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,207
Thanks: 6,568
Thanked 2,017 Times in 919 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chr2002ca View Post
Not necessarily true. I have NOS big block frame stands for my 69 that shift the engine to the passenger side properly and I still had to dimple my Hedmans and would've had to dimple a set of Hookers to fit near the steering box. If the #5 header tube does not loop over the #7 tube, then the #5 tube and possibly #7 tube are probably going to hit a power steering gear box no matter how correct the frame stands are. I've seen people place shims under the drivers side frame stands to create extra clearance. Some power steering boxes stick out more than others also. I had to rework my #7 tube when I changed to a different ps box.

Additionally, he said the headers are hitting his idler arm also, so shifting the engine more to the passenger side would make this worse. I saw a thread where a guy had the same problem with his Lemons and had to send that side back to get reworked slightly.

It's a difficult fit for any header manufacture. It's a crappy situation for the original poster because of how pricey the stainless headers are and how pricey it is to return them to have them corrected.
I understand that not all headers fit correctly, but if he has different frame pads than what the manufacturer used in their header design he has little chance of them fitting without modding them. My Hookers fit perfectly (although tight) on my 69 Camaro with the correct GM big block frame pads.
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-29-2013, 07:30 PM
chr2002ca's Avatar
chr2002ca chr2002ca is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 775
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camcojb View Post
My Hookers fit perfectly (although tight) on my 69 Camaro with the correct GM big block frame pads.
Congratulations. You're one of the few! I'm jealous. Hooker makes 3 or 4 different models(design, primary tube sizes) each with completely different fitments and issues. I tried Hooker 2205's earlier this year and they fit very poorly and the craftsmanship was just horrible and I sent them back to Summit and decided to just re-work my Hedmans. I read from others that other models of Hookers(that have the #5 tube loop over the #7 tube) had no issues with fitment at the steering box, but had severe issues with it hitting their road racing oil pan or that they hung too low or hit somewhere else, so I didn't even want to try those. I've also heard that ordering the same model of headers twice from Hooker could get you 2 different fitments depending on how the guy building them was feeling that day.

It's simply a role of the dice. Even the priciest headers sometimes don't fit. I went to a physically smaller power steering box and it actually fit worse due to how certain areas stick out more than others. It's difficult/impossible for header manufacturers to account for something like that.

If I was to recommend any header, I'd have to go with Lemons also. They seem to have the least amount of fitment issues and most of time fit perfectly out of the box.
__________________
Chris Robinson
1969 Camaro SS/RS, 489 ZL-1 MPFI, T-56 Mag

Last edited by chr2002ca; 08-29-2013 at 07:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-29-2013, 07:32 PM
8hg383 8hg383 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have got the big block mounts on they are Chris Alston big block engine and frame mounts i have measured them and comparied them with standard big block mounts and there are the same height.
I checked all that before even contacting SW as i wanted to be 100% sure i was doing the right thing befor blamming someone else.
I think they are to suit steering rack vehicle not box as there are that far away from getting them to fit.
The thing is they are hard against the box and idler arm so moving the motor left or right will not work nor will moving the motor up as the number one pipe is hard against the steering box body from the top of the box to the bottom.
All advice is appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-29-2013, 07:48 PM
8hg383 8hg383 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Some pics.
Attached Images
   
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-29-2013, 08:05 PM
clill's Avatar
clill clill is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,612
Thanks: 70
Thanked 1,859 Times in 653 Posts
Default

Is that a GM subframe or Alston ?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-29-2013, 08:14 PM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,207
Thanks: 6,568
Thanked 2,017 Times in 919 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8hg383 View Post
I have got the big block mounts on they are Chris Alston big block engine and frame mounts i have measured them and comparied them with standard big block mounts and there are the same height.
I checked all that before even contacting SW as i wanted to be 100% sure i was doing the right thing befor blamming someone else.
I think they are to suit steering rack vehicle not box as there are that far away from getting them to fit.
The thing is they are hard against the box and idler arm so moving the motor left or right will not work nor will moving the motor up as the number one pipe is hard against the steering box body from the top of the box to the bottom.
All advice is appreciated.
What cylinder heads do you have? And by big block mounts, you have Chassisworks frame pads and they measured the same as GM big block frame pads? I'm speaking of the frame pads themselves, not the motor mounts.
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-29-2013, 08:41 PM
chr2002ca's Avatar
chr2002ca chr2002ca is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 775
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I believe I see at least part of the problem in the photos(besides the fact that it's not a stock subframe which adds a big variable). That's not a stock power steering box, and it's the same model I just switched to from a larger/heavier model/series(my previous one was from AGR). The one he has I believe is the '600 series' model that's smaller and lighter than other quick-ratio PS steering boxes, but also unfortunately makes that common fitment issue against the #5 tube even worse. Like I mentioned earlier, it's specific to headers designed like his(and mine) where all tubes just go immediately downward instead of the #5 tube looping over the #7 tube. That particular series of power steering box just sticks out like that in that exact area against the #5 tube even worse than other quick-ratio boxes. The other quick-ratio boxes can also have a clearance problem right there, but the 600 series is even a little worse. It's a situation that's not fair to header manufacturers and sucks for both parties really. Now, the passenger side header hitting on the idler arm is another issue in itself that I won't comment on, and if other tubes on the drivers side are hitting, there's not much you can do for clearancing that doesn't involve modification to the header.

For that #5 tube issue, if you change that particular bolt on the steering box that is hitting the header to a button head bolt, and you do a little light grinding(flap disk) in that area of the steering box cover to add some additional clearance, you should be okay. You could wrap a little titanium header/heat wrap around that area of that tube if you're worried about heat transfer(I did just to be safe). The engine will rotate upwards in that area when you hit the gas, so clearance will be okay at WOT. I have the exact same situation with my headers, but mine's even worse than his. I had to do some "clearancing" and also had to dimple my #5 tube slightly. My #7 tube was really bad and I had to cut a section of it out completely and add a curve to it. All because of the "smaller"(in all the wrong places) steering box. His #7 tube looks like a much better design than mine.
__________________
Chris Robinson
1969 Camaro SS/RS, 489 ZL-1 MPFI, T-56 Mag

Last edited by chr2002ca; 08-29-2013 at 08:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-29-2013, 09:05 PM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 13,207
Thanks: 6,568
Thanked 2,017 Times in 919 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chr2002ca View Post
I believe I see at least part of the problem in the photos(besides the fact that it's not a stock subframe which adds a big variable). That's not a stock power steering box, and it's the same model I just switched to from a larger/heavier model/series(my previous one was from AGR). The one he has I believe is the '600 series' model that's smaller and lighter than other quick-ratio PS steering boxes, but also unfortunately makes that common fitment issue against the #5 tube even worse. Like I mentioned earlier, it's specific to headers designed like his(and mine) where all tubes just go immediately downward instead of the #5 tube looping over the #7 tube. That particular series of power steering box just sticks out like that in that exact area against the #5 tube even worse than other quick-ratio boxes. The other quick-ratio boxes can also have a clearance problem right there, but the 600 series is even a little worse. It's a situation that's not fair to header manufacturers and sucks for both parties really. Now, the passenger side header hitting on the idler arm is another issue in itself that I won't comment on, and if other tubes on the drivers side are hitting, there's not much you can do for clearancing that doesn't involve modification to the header.

For that #5 tube issue, if you change that particular bolt on the steering box that is hitting the header to a button head bolt, and you do a little light grinding(flap disk) in that area of the steering box cover to add some additional clearance, you should be okay. You could wrap a little titanium header/heat wrap around that area of that tube if you're worried about heat transfer(I did just to be safe). The engine will rotate upwards in that area when you hit the gas, so clearance will be okay at WOT. I have the exact same situation with my headers, but mine's even worse than his. I had to do some "clearancing" and also had to dimple my #5 tube slightly. My #7 tube was really bad and I had to cut a section of it out completely and add a curve to it. All because of the "smaller"(in all the wrong places) steering box. His #7 tube looks like a much better design than mine.
I thought it was a stock subframe with a DSE Speed 3 kit, hard to tell. The steering box being changed is an issue as you said as it has less clearance in that tube area than the stock one. If he has aftermarket heads (or some GM Performance heads), many of those have raised exhaust ports, another potential issue, especially with the steering box, maybe the idler arm depending on how the tubes are run.
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-29-2013, 09:08 PM
chr2002ca's Avatar
chr2002ca chr2002ca is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 775
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camcojb View Post
I thought it was a stock subframe with a DSE Speed 3 kit, hard to tell. The steering box being changed is an issue as you said as it has less clearance in that tube area than the stock one. If he has aftermarket heads (or some GM Performance heads), many of those have raised exhaust ports, another potential issue, especially with the idler arm and steering box.
Yes, you could be right about the frame. I can't tell either. I assumed Chris Alston subframe when he mention the mounts and I saw the pic.
__________________
Chris Robinson
1969 Camaro SS/RS, 489 ZL-1 MPFI, T-56 Mag
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-29-2013, 10:49 PM
8hg383 8hg383 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the replies its good to hear from people with similar issues.
Its a stock subframe with a DSE front suspension kit and steering box.
The heads are Dart which run a 300th raised port
All this information was told when ordering the headers. The number1 tube hits hard against the box from the top all the way down the body and also hits the top control arm bolt.
I did change the steering box top bolts to mushroom head but made little difference.Not sure weather you can see in the pic but the header isnt even flush on the head yet it stiil needs to be rotated up which i cant do as its against the box and no gasket on yet either.On the other side number 1 tube is hard against idler arm rubber seal.
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net