...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > LSX Conversions
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-04-2014, 11:19 PM
Vince@Meanstreets's Avatar
Vince@Meanstreets Vince@Meanstreets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 5,532
Thanks: 13
Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by INTMD8 View Post
Fwiw I used Dynatech headers on my 69 Camaro and fitment is perfect.
part number DTC-715-11410 is $525 shipped
__________________
MEANSTREETS PERFORMANCE

Dealer for
ACCUAIR rideheight control systems
ENTROPY RADIATORS XXX radiators for your pro-touring vehicle
FORGELINE MOTORSPORTS Highline custom 3 piece wheels
WEGNER AUTOMOTIVE Custom engines and LSX drive systems
SPEEDTECH PERFORMANCE Bay Area stocking dealer

NEVER FORGET -11
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2014, 06:01 AM
toddoky toddoky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vince@MSperfab View Post
part number DTC-715-11410 is $525 shipped
Hey Vince, do you have a picture of how far the collectors of the Dynatech headers hang down below the subframe? I've read multiple comments from users saying they hang too low and I'd like to see it for myself.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-05-2014, 06:47 AM
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi's Avatar
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi OBeer-WAN-Kenobi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the insight.

BTW, I'm using trans-dapt stock position mount plates that are supposed to mimic the stock SBC bellhousing location.

I have some pictures if they'll help but can't post them until tomorrow. Basically, the top inboard-rear bolt on the steering box lines up with the second spark plug from the back if you are looking from overhead.

Maybe some of you guys with different header brands could snap a pic from above with a tape measure in it for scale?

And yes, I'd rather have my headers tuck up pretty tight. My engine sits fairly low with the Holley 302-2 pan about 1/2" above the crossmember.
__________________
'69 RS Camaro
'99 SWB Silverado LS "Beater"
'01 GMC Sierra 2500HD LQ4 (Turbo build)
'04 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4X4


My '69 Camaro Build Thread
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-05-2014, 08:25 AM
toddoky toddoky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OBeer-WAN-Kenobi View Post
Thanks for the insight.

BTW, I'm using trans-dapt stock position mount plates that are supposed to mimic the stock SBC bellhousing location.

I have some pictures if they'll help but can't post them until tomorrow. Basically, the top inboard-rear bolt on the steering box lines up with the second spark plug from the back if you are looking from overhead.

Maybe some of you guys with different header brands could snap a pic from above with a tape measure in it for scale?

And yes, I'd rather have my headers tuck up pretty tight. My engine sits fairly low with the Holley 302-2 pan about 1/2" above the crossmember.
I have various images at work of the new Hooker headers from the same angle and can post them up for you for a comparative reference if you like. The other location you can get a common distance location that is familiar to most is how far away your passenger side cylinder head is from the firewall...I have a clear shot showing that distance obtained with using the new Hooker clamshell retrofit engine brackets and crossmembers as well, so with all of that you should get a fair idea of what your header options are. Lasty, I think it would be important to you to ask anyone posting images of their combos to also show the ground clearance of the headers since it seems to be high on everyone's list of important design features.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-06-2014, 07:18 AM
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi's Avatar
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi OBeer-WAN-Kenobi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toddoky View Post
I have various images at work of the new Hooker headers from the same angle and can post them up for you for a comparative reference if you like. The other location you can get a common distance location that is familiar to most is how far away your passenger side cylinder head is from the firewall...I have a clear shot showing that distance obtained with using the new Hooker clamshell retrofit engine brackets and crossmembers as well, so with all of that you should get a fair idea of what your header options are. Lasty, I think it would be important to you to ask anyone posting images of their combos to also show the ground clearance of the headers since it seems to be high on everyone's list of important design features.
Yes, please post some pix!

Here are a couple of pictures from this weekend:
Attached Images
  
__________________
'69 RS Camaro
'99 SWB Silverado LS "Beater"
'01 GMC Sierra 2500HD LQ4 (Turbo build)
'04 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4X4


My '69 Camaro Build Thread
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-06-2014, 09:47 AM
toddoky toddoky is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OBeer-WAN-Kenobi View Post
Yes, please post some pix!

Here are a couple of pictures from this weekend:
As you requested, here's a similar picture showing the clearances of the Hooker driver side header around the steering box and one of the ground clearance under the car. The fitment is obtained using the new Hooker mounts and transmission crossmembers; fitment with other brand/type mounts is questionable due to the unique co-dependent geometry used in the design of the Hooker parts. There is also mid-length headers available that share the same basic wrap around the steering box, so that is another option for you if long tubes don't suit your needs.
Attached Images
  
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-06-2014, 09:58 AM
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi's Avatar
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi OBeer-WAN-Kenobi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toddoky View Post
As you requested, here's a similar picture showing the clearances of the Hooker driver side header around the steering box and one of the ground clearance under the car. The fitment is obtained using the new Hooker mounts and transmission crossmembers; fitment with other brand/type mounts is questionable due to the unique co-dependent geometry used in the design of the Hooker parts. There is also mid-length headers available that share the same basic wrap around the steering box, so that is another option for you if long tubes don't suit your needs.
Thanks!

It looks really close to mine. At first I couldn't figure it out in relation to that spark plug until I realized you didn't have one in the hole.
It would "appear" that the hookers would fit mine. Last I checked though, you didn't offer stainless steel for the LS swap application. Why is that?

On the other hand, I've got to do something about my subframe now that I found it's pretty crappy. Don't have an extra one laying about do you? LOL
__________________
'69 RS Camaro
'99 SWB Silverado LS "Beater"
'01 GMC Sierra 2500HD LQ4 (Turbo build)
'04 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4X4


My '69 Camaro Build Thread
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-11-2014, 08:18 AM
rickpaw rickpaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 889
Thanks: 24
Thanked 26 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by toddoky View Post
Hey Vince, do you have a picture of how far the collectors of the Dynatech headers hang down below the subframe? I've read multiple comments from users saying they hang too low and I'd like to see it for myself.
Toddoky,

Here are a few pictures of the Dynatech headers I took yesterday for a member here. I'm using DSE mounts as recommended by Dynatech, and as the pictures show, they hang way too low. My car is lowered with Hotchkis 2" drop front/1.5" drop rear.





I'm in the market for different headers now.
__________________
Tu Ho
67 Firebird (aka "Money Pit")-5.3/4l60e, restomod.
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=43170
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-11-2014, 09:00 AM
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi's Avatar
OBeer-WAN-Kenobi OBeer-WAN-Kenobi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickpaw View Post
I'm in the market for different headers now.
Holy crap those things are low!

Maybe if enough of us bug Texas Speed they'll send us some pix...

https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=45035
__________________
'69 RS Camaro
'99 SWB Silverado LS "Beater"
'01 GMC Sierra 2500HD LQ4 (Turbo build)
'04 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4X4


My '69 Camaro Build Thread
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-12-2014, 10:29 AM
67Rally's Avatar
67Rally 67Rally is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OBeer-WAN-Kenobi View Post
Holy crap those things are low!

Maybe if enough of us bug Texas Speed they'll send us some pix...

https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=45035
The more I look at them, the more I think they are the same header just in a stainless steel finish. I could be wrong, but both headers (drivers and pax) look nearly identical to each brand.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net