...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-19-2014, 04:03 PM
ArisESQ ArisESQ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Gatos
Posts: 765
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Default

Without knowing anything of the specifics, I think that unless something on the chassis failed (due to a flaw in manufacturing or even design problem), I don't think the guy's got much of a case. The chassis manufacturer will likely argue that the driver was contributorily negligent as well, so this could possibly get somewhat messy for everyone involved.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-19-2014, 04:35 PM
DOOM's Avatar
DOOM DOOM is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Side Chicago
Posts: 2,912
Thanks: 7
Thanked 64 Times in 40 Posts
Default

Nothing failed from what I understand . It's coming down to the way the chassis held up in the accident. From what he's telling me came apart like a tin can. They hired a ''consultant'' from the NTSB this suit is no joke thats for sure. There in the process of going over the structural integrity of the chassis. Thats the main focus as it was explained to me . Tried to get more out of him but there was only so much he could tell me.
__________________
Mario
USCOLLISION
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-19-2014, 04:53 PM
OOCustoms's Avatar
OOCustoms OOCustoms is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Benicia CA
Posts: 70
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I can see where this is going, Next thing you know companies will have to crash test their products before being able to sell them on the open market....
I might be way out there but its these kinds of things that lead to more rules.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-19-2014, 05:14 PM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

It's like with anything, there are some people that can cut and weld and think they can make anything. Just like contractors, a guy owns a pick-up, saw and hammer and they think they are a contractor. Anyone building a chassis,chassis components etc. have some responsibility to produce a safe product. This will be interesting.
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works

Last edited by ccracin; 02-19-2014 at 05:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-19-2014, 05:45 PM
GodSpeed GodSpeed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 22
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

What about when you see on the majority of products labeled for off-road use only? Does that excuse them from liability? Its an unfortunate incident and good thing nobody died from it. I just hope it does not lead to an instance where people like Roadster shop, Detroit etc have to go through great lengths to put out a product. Hopefully you can keep us updated as much as possible. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-19-2014, 05:50 PM
TheJDMan's Avatar
TheJDMan TheJDMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 690
Thanks: 5
Thanked 25 Times in 13 Posts
Default

At the very least this kind of lawsuit will increase the price of products.
__________________
Steve Hayes
"Dust Off"
68 Camaro
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, that's what gets you!
"Jeremy Clarkson"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-19-2014, 06:44 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Sometimes a manufacturer DOES actually build a faulty or unsafe product.. and frankly - when that happens and somebody gets hurt as a result - too bad for the manufacturer...


Other times it's lawyers and their clients going after the deepest pockets... and that's when it's just plain CRAP...


When I see aftermarket chassis - and I compare them to the FACTORY OEM stuff...(just visually) most everything I've ever seen looks far better than the factory. They are - after all - pretty simple pieces as far as basic design. Two sticks with a crossmember - and some suspension bolted on.


What I always look at and wonder about -- is -- the size and type of tires and brakes we're sticking on this stuff... and then going to tracks to beat on it.... and are these "stresses" ever taken into consideration. I mean - was the suspension and pick up points etc designed for a 305 - 200 or lower tread wear tire -- with 15" 6 piston brakes... banging a corner at 105MPH....


I hope so...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-24-2014, 09:50 AM
Blake Foster's Avatar
Blake Foster Blake Foster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St George Utah
Posts: 2,526
Thanks: 6
Thanked 101 Times in 44 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheJDMan View Post
At the very least this kind of lawsuit will increase the price of products.
that is a possibility. if the insurance cost goes up and more testing is required someone has to pay for it.
__________________
Blake Foster
www.speedtechperformance.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net