...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-22-2014, 12:32 PM
David Pozzi's Avatar
David Pozzi David Pozzi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 575
Thanks: 2
Thanked 58 Times in 20 Posts
Default

I don't have the roll center height data but they say it's very stable which is the main consideration, it moves 1:1 with the body.

We are starting from scratch on spring rates and shock valving. The motion ratios are different from the stick axle we had, more like the front now. We are at 450 in spring rate which is what Morrison runs on their 69 Camaro. It works very well, I doubt we will be far from that in a year from now, but time will tell.
We started with an aggressive toe steer setting (toe out in bump) we found that to be too much and backed it down to pretty close to what Morrison runs on their 69 right now. We will experiment further.
I'm not much up to speed on the "numbers" yet, we have been so busy just getting it into the car. I'm not sure my Performance Trends software can even handle this type of suspension. I kinda doubt it.
__________________
http://www.PozziRacing.com

Last edited by David Pozzi; 04-22-2014 at 12:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-22-2014, 01:29 PM
mfain mfain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 453
Thanks: 76
Thanked 108 Times in 51 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Pozzi View Post
I don't have the roll center height data but they say it's very stable which is the main consideration, it moves 1:1 with the body.

We are starting from scratch on spring rates and shock valving. The motion ratios are different from the stick axle we had, more like the front now. We are at 450 in spring rate which is what Morrison runs on their 69 Camaro. It works very well, I doubt we will be far from that in a year from now, but time will tell.
We started with an aggressive toe steer setting (toe out in bump) we found that to be too much and backed it down to pretty close to what Morrison runs on their 69 right now. We will experiment further.
I'm not much up to speed on the "numbers" yet, we have been so busy just getting it into the car. I'm not sure my Performance Trends software can even handle this type of suspension. I kinda doubt it.
Thanks David. I use Performance Trends for various IRS designs. The data enters like a double a-arm front suspension with X,Y, and Z measurements of the pivot points. It will yield moment center, instant centers, camber gain, and the like. I am anxious to see Mary's car perform in person.

Pappy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-22-2014, 03:50 PM
David Pozzi's Avatar
David Pozzi David Pozzi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 575
Thanks: 2
Thanked 58 Times in 20 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mfain View Post
Thanks David. I use Performance Trends for various IRS designs. The data enters like a double a-arm front suspension with X,Y, and Z measurements of the pivot points. It will yield moment center, instant centers, camber gain, and the like. I am anxious to see Mary's car perform in person.

Pappy
That's encouraging, I have to get all the measurements for it.
__________________
http://www.PozziRacing.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net