...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-13-2017, 12:46 PM
NOT A TA's Avatar
NOT A TA NOT A TA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 671
Thanks: 6
Thanked 25 Times in 23 Posts
Default

I feel bad for the people who put in all the research, time, money, and effort into builds that don't quite "hit the mark" visually. Often it appears the basic design concepts used in the original design are ignored.

In the case of the cover cars note that the modified areas are done with a more straight line angular appearance with sharper body lines and creases than the original car was. As an example look at the Mustang above and below the front bumper. The original oval grill, round headlights, and softer body line curves contrasts with the rocket bunny looking air dam section below the bumper.

Another thing (which I try to remind myself of) is that many of us have been accustomed to seeing the same basic shape since the cars were new. Sure there's been engines sticking out of hoods, jacked up rears with big little's, lowered, bigger diameter wheels with low pro tires, and other modifications but the basic cars have been essentially the same. So when we see one with body modifications our mind tells us it doesn't look quite right. Whenever I see a car with body mods I try to look at it and think to myself "If I didn't expect the car to look as it did stock would I like the way this one looks?"
__________________
John Paige

70 Firebird Esprit, 400 TA clone type "The 14 car"
lab-14.com

Last edited by NOT A TA; 06-16-2017 at 12:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-13-2017, 01:20 PM
ironworks's Avatar
ironworks ironworks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bakersfield, Ca
Posts: 5,155
Thanks: 4
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NOT A TA View Post
I feel bad for the people who put in all the research, time, money, and effort into builds that don't quite "hit the mark" visually. It often it appears the basic design concepts used in the original design are ignored.

In the case of the cover cars note that the modified areas are done with a more straight line angular appearance with sharper body lines and creases than the original car was. As an example look at the Mustang above and below the front bumper. The original oval grill, round headlights, and softer body line curves contrasts with the rocket bunny looking air dam section below the bumper.

Another thing (which I try to remind myself of) is that many of us have been accustomed to seeing the same basic shape since the cars were new. Sure there's been engines sticking out of hoods, jacked up rears with big little's, lowered, bigger diameter wheels with low pro tires, and other modifications but the basic cars have been essentially the same. So when we see one with body modifications our mind tells us it doesn't look quite right. Whenever I see a car with body mods I try to look at it and think to myself "If I didn't expect the car to look as it did stock would I like the way this one looks?"
That is the trick is to not ruin those original styling point every one knows. But still improve on the car.
__________________
www.ironworksspeedandkustom.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net