...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2006, 10:53 PM
Marcus SC&C's Avatar
Marcus SC&C Marcus SC&C is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: S.E. PA.
Posts: 169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

The G mod is a good thing but don`t be fooled into thinking it`s an all gain,no pain kinda thing. First off when you relocate the holes the arms will hit the top of the perchs so you`ll need to do quite a bit of reshaping (without taking too much strength/rigidity out of them). The G mod helps out some with + caster but not as much as different arms can,the perch just doesn`t have enough meat to move the holes that far. The only way around these two problems is to cut the whole perch off,cut it down and remount it in a new more idealized location. It`s best to make a jig to ensure that they end up in the right place. I`ve done it a number of times and it`s a lot of work but it you do it right it looks factory. The other issue is that when you lower the holes it adds + camber. Lowering the car also ads + camber. Even with the G mod you won`t start getting any - gain until it`s pretty low and then it`ll be very mild (but at least it won`t be + gain!). BTW we can achieve even larger gains with just a tall upper ball joint. At any rate when you go to align it you may not be able to get the specs you`d really like to have even with big stacks of shims. Offset cross shafts may be necessary to get any kind of decent performance alignment out of it. It varies from car to car and with ride height but you should be aware of it. Dick Guldstrand`s cars had stock *appearing* upper arms on them but that doesn`t mean they *were* stock dimensions and shape. I`ve modified a number of sets of arms myself and while they work fine and you`d never suspect by looking at them they all took a lot of time in design and fabricating work to get them just right.
I`m not trying to talk you out of it,just giving you a heads up on some of the technicalities. However you do it you`ll be taking the geometry from poor to at least indifferent. It can be made much better but you`ll have to spend on some new parts to do it. Mark SC&C
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2006, 11:15 PM
sikryd sikryd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Makaha, Hawaii
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Hey Mark, Thanks for all of the info you have provided. I figured it was not as easy as drilling new holes and moving the arms. I'm actually not really making a G machine out of my 67, I'm more of a street / strip kind of guy. After all, I am planning on running ladders with coil overs in the rear. I just figured I may be able to get my car to turn a little better with the mod. Then again...... I do have 15 x 3 Welds on the front right now so.... I wont be making any fast turns in the near future.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2006, 10:38 PM
David Pozzi's Avatar
David Pozzi David Pozzi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 575
Thanks: 2
Thanked 58 Times in 20 Posts
Default

It really doesn't sound like you are going to benefit from the Guldstrand mod due to the way your camaro is equipped. But the mod is free and only takes some drilling and cutting for clearance. I have the magazine article here: http://www.pozziracing.com/first_gen...0upper%20mount
once the page loads, scroll down just a little and look for "part I " and "part II"
David
__________________
http://www.PozziRacing.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net