...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Off Topic Forums
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-26-2017, 06:36 AM
out2kayak out2kayak is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Leo, IN
Posts: 440
Thanks: 4
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Sorry for the rant, but here are my thoughts...

Actually, there are things that are much simpler to O'care and government purchased everything that could be done to fix the system.

The fundamental issue, in my humble estimation, is there are significant structural forces that have completely screwed up healthcare.

First and foremost - the consumer must have transparency to cost. How many times have you gone to have a procedure without any clue as to what it will cost and what your total out of pocket cost will be.

Imagine what would happen if you were having some work done on your car. You drive up to the mechanic and simply say "fix it". A time period later, you get your car back and everything is working. You drive away happy, because the thing that was broken is now fixed.

Over the course of the next six to twelve months you get random high dollar bills. One for the engine specialist. One for the body guy. One for the paint booth owner. ... and so on.

Now, imagine that the government passes laws saying that there are certain things on your car that you cannot have access to. It will cause your car to be dangerous, they say, to give to the general public. This includes things such as tires, brake pads, etc. You must go through your mechanic to have them install these, else you'll endanger everyone else on the road.

This is exactly what we have in healthcare. Imagine if the law required that, doctors and hospitals could charge whatever they wanted, but every single procedure they offer must have prices publicly listed and whatever price they post is what must be paid.

Imagine if people had access to the wide variety of drugs that today are only available to doctors. Instead of keeping people ignorant and must go to the doctors for prescription, drug makers must inform the population on the pros and cons of their offering.

Finally, imagine if there were real competition between doctors and hospitals. Consumer reports or similar would yearly compare, much the same way happens in the auto industry, cost / quality / overall value for different procedures.

O'care did none of these. Instead it made things far, far worse. People are much further abstracted from the whole of payer, provider and consumer process.

Sigh... Enough of a rant. Thanks for the indulgence.
__________________
-- Joe
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-28-2017, 08:38 AM
syborg tt's Avatar
syborg tt syborg tt is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,403
Thanks: 5,518
Thanked 1,954 Times in 1,057 Posts
Default

That is an interesting concept and I think a great idea.

Quote:
Originally Posted by out2kayak View Post
Sorry for the rant, but here are my thoughts...

Actually, there are things that are much simpler to O'care and government purchased everything that could be done to fix the system.

The fundamental issue, in my humble estimation, is there are significant structural forces that have completely screwed up healthcare.

First and foremost - the consumer must have transparency to cost. How many times have you gone to have a procedure without any clue as to what it will cost and what your total out of pocket cost will be.

Imagine what would happen if you were having some work done on your car. You drive up to the mechanic and simply say "fix it". A time period later, you get your car back and everything is working. You drive away happy, because the thing that was broken is now fixed.

Over the course of the next six to twelve months you get random high dollar bills. One for the engine specialist. One for the body guy. One for the paint booth owner. ... and so on.

Now, imagine that the government passes laws saying that there are certain things on your car that you cannot have access to. It will cause your car to be dangerous, they say, to give to the general public. This includes things such as tires, brake pads, etc. You must go through your mechanic to have them install these, else you'll endanger everyone else on the road.

This is exactly what we have in healthcare. Imagine if the law required that, doctors and hospitals could charge whatever they wanted, but every single procedure they offer must have prices publicly listed and whatever price they post is what must be paid.

Imagine if people had access to the wide variety of drugs that today are only available to doctors. Instead of keeping people ignorant and must go to the doctors for prescription, drug makers must inform the population on the pros and cons of their offering.

Finally, imagine if there were real competition between doctors and hospitals. Consumer reports or similar would yearly compare, much the same way happens in the auto industry, cost / quality / overall value for different procedures.

O'care did none of these. Instead it made things far, far worse. People are much further abstracted from the whole of payer, provider and consumer process.

Sigh... Enough of a rant. Thanks for the indulgence.
__________________
marty-mj
Is a car ever really done???? It's like a ball of yarn unwinding, that has no end... Author DKz Garage

Projects - Syborg TT 4.3l v6 Mini-Truck, 2nd Chance Camaro & SLP575 Bumble Bee - 4Sale
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-28-2017, 09:04 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by out2kayak View Post
Sorry for the rant, but here are my thoughts...

Actually, there are things that are much simpler to O'care and government purchased everything that could be done to fix the system.

The fundamental issue, in my humble estimation, is there are significant structural forces that have completely screwed up healthcare.

First and foremost - the consumer must have transparency to cost. How many times have you gone to have a procedure without any clue as to what it will cost and what your total out of pocket cost will be.

Imagine what would happen if you were having some work done on your car. You drive up to the mechanic and simply say "fix it". A time period later, you get your car back and everything is working. You drive away happy, because the thing that was broken is now fixed.

Over the course of the next six to twelve months you get random high dollar bills. One for the engine specialist. One for the body guy. One for the paint booth owner. ... and so on.

Now, imagine that the government passes laws saying that there are certain things on your car that you cannot have access to. It will cause your car to be dangerous, they say, to give to the general public. This includes things such as tires, brake pads, etc. You must go through your mechanic to have them install these, else you'll endanger everyone else on the road.

This is exactly what we have in healthcare. Imagine if the law required that, doctors and hospitals could charge whatever they wanted, but every single procedure they offer must have prices publicly listed and whatever price they post is what must be paid.

Imagine if people had access to the wide variety of drugs that today are only available to doctors. Instead of keeping people ignorant and must go to the doctors for prescription, drug makers must inform the population on the pros and cons of their offering.

Finally, imagine if there were real competition between doctors and hospitals. Consumer reports or similar would yearly compare, much the same way happens in the auto industry, cost / quality / overall value for different procedures.

O'care did none of these. Instead it made things far, far worse. People are much further abstracted from the whole of payer, provider and consumer process.

Sigh... Enough of a rant. Thanks for the indulgence.



This is a great idea!



The other thing that just kills me <is that the wrong expression in a healthcare discussion?>.... if a procedure is "retail" $5,000 -- but they have an agreement with the insurance company where it only pays $2,000...... then that is the value of that procedure. Don't bill me $5,000 for it!! WTF

When I worked (pre WWI) - a store was not allowed to advertise something as being "on sale" -- or discounted from a price -- unless they could show that they actually had offered and had sales of that item at the higher price prior. Period. Otherwise the "sale price" was the price -- so stating that it was "on sale" was complete BS.

Why bill an uninsured person $5,000 when you're willing to do the procedure for only $2,000. You'd probably stand a better chance of collecting on the 2K bill than the 5K (or 50K - or 500K) bill.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-28-2017, 09:41 AM
syborg tt's Avatar
syborg tt syborg tt is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,403
Thanks: 5,518
Thanked 1,954 Times in 1,057 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Why bill an uninsured person $5,000 when you're willing to do the procedure for only $2,000. You'd probably stand a better chance of collecting on the 2K bill than the 5K (or 50K - or 500K) bill.
Agree 100%

Hospital billing it total bullsh.T
__________________
marty-mj
Is a car ever really done???? It's like a ball of yarn unwinding, that has no end... Author DKz Garage

Projects - Syborg TT 4.3l v6 Mini-Truck, 2nd Chance Camaro & SLP575 Bumble Bee - 4Sale
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net