...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 03-24-2011, 08:59 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiep View Post
Greg,

I've been to the dyno a few times over the years, but 99.9% is done on the street or at the track, laptop on the passenger seat. Best case scenario is a buddy manning the laptop so I don't pass as a drunk driver.

My last car had the original Fast "classic" ECU, which was actually sold by Speed Pro at the time, and my current car is an older Accel Gen 7 that’s upgraded to the 5.5 firmware (sounds like you are familiar with the system). Both systems have widebands and you can get the car driving really well in no time. Maybe I'm a perfectionist, but I've found you can get 95% of the way there in the first hour or so [with the wideband system] where there is no discernable driveability issues ... That last 5% of tweaking takes quite a bit of time, at least for me.

First aftermarket ECU I retrofitted was a Haltech F3 into an early 3rd gen Camaro, back when it was far more popular to take off FI for a carb than vice versa!
I agree completely.... after the dyno -- it takes lots of seat time! Cold start... is always an issue... getting it to fire on the first revolution (just like a brand new car)... and on and on.

I think that is why I've fallen in love with the FAST EZ EFI... it just works... and seems to get better with each drive... and all I've had to do is DRIVE... it's like gettin' laid by the cheer squad! So easy... and FUN!
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 03-24-2011, 09:24 PM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,034
Thanks: 33
Thanked 99 Times in 41 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
TOUCHE!!




But it WAS right after a fresh EFI install!!

So did I run it out of gas --- or was it that dang EFI?

Sorry, couldn't resist that op!
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 04-01-2011, 01:05 PM
BanditDave BanditDave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 410
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Hey Guys,

Question on where you guys hooked up your MAP input for your MSD box (ASSuming you are using this on an LS app)? Did you guys T off the EZ EFI's MAP or did you install another sensor in the intake.

I know this may seem counter-intuitive to use on an LS but I have a specific reason.

Open to your thoughts. Judging by what most are using it on, it would appear they are using distributor'd engines and controlling just fuel with this set-up.

Thanks,
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 04-08-2011, 05:21 PM
g356gear's Avatar
g356gear g356gear is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 660
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
Default

So is this system MAP or MAf based?? I am assuming there is no timing control...just fuel control based on O2 sensor feedback.
__________________
69 SS396 Camaro Coupe, 4link, 12bolt posi, Speedtech LCA and UCA's, Hotchkis 2" drop springs and sway bar, Ridetech triple remote resevoir coilovers, Bilsteins, Wilwood 6 piston front/4 piston rear, Magnaflow stainless exhaust, Lemons Headers, Comp rollers/p-rods/cam, Fikse 18x8.5 and 18x10
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 05-28-2011, 12:53 AM
shaun8541 shaun8541 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Does anyone know if the EZ EFI will handle more than 500 hp? I have 510hp naturally aspirated on my SBF 427 and I want to add a Paxton Supercharger. Paxton says up to a 30% gain in hp over stock. Would the easy work or would I need to step up to the XFI and all the tuning costs etc?
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 05-28-2011, 07:38 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g356gear View Post
So is this system MAP or MAf based?? I am assuming there is no timing control...just fuel control based on O2 sensor feedback.
MAP based... and you are correct. The EZ EFI builds a VE table based on your input of cubic inches and nozzle size - fuel pressure etc... and then self corrects that table with driving and using the readings it gets from the O2. There is NO timing control. Super simple - super effective system.
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 05-28-2011, 07:39 AM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaun8541 View Post
Does anyone know if the EZ EFI will handle more than 500 hp? I have 510hp naturally aspirated on my SBF 427 and I want to add a Paxton Supercharger. Paxton says up to a 30% gain in hp over stock. Would the easy work or would I need to step up to the XFI and all the tuning costs etc?

Personally I'd choose an XFI system once you go beyond N/A. You're going to need effective control of your timing etc and the EZ EFI will not do that.
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 05-29-2011, 08:24 AM
shaun8541 shaun8541 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
Personally I'd choose an XFI system once you go beyond N/A. You're going to need effective control of your timing etc and the EZ EFI will not do that.
XFI it is. Thanks Greg!
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 05-31-2011, 10:55 AM
captainofiron's Avatar
captainofiron captainofiron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 206
Thanks: 29
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

After reading this, I am definitely going with the EZ for my 68

I had always been a little nervous about getting the XFI, because of the tuning, and lack of laptop access

but now that I have read so many good things, Im sold
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 06-16-2011, 12:56 PM
garymac69's Avatar
garymac69 garymac69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default rear-bypassed fuel system?

Quote:
Originally Posted by camcojb View Post
I have run rear-bypassed systems with and without a vacuum reference to the regulator. Both ways worked fine for me. With a forced induction setup I like the reference line so I can get additional fuel pressure under boost.

I think you're fine running without it, and just having a static (unchanging) fuel pressure.

Jody
Has anyone gone with a rear-bypassed fuel system and does the system work well with the EZ-EFI? Did you run a vacuum line back to the regulator?

The fuel system issue is the main reason I have not jumped into the EFI arena.

Gary
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net