...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-15-2008, 01:18 AM
Bowtieracing Bowtieracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,919
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProdigyCustoms
You cannot run this tire with a larger rim then a 12" and fit it under a mini tub no matter what you do to the lip. Tt that size, adding a 1/2 inch of wheel adds a half inch of section width and quickly make the sidewall to large. I just had to re do a pair of 13" rims that would not fit. I had to have them made into 12s.

As for that tire fitting on a 12" rim, Actually Michelin spec is done with a 12" wheel. Here is the Tire Rack page on Michelin PS2s

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.j...e1=yes&place=0


Up front a 285 / 35 / 18 would work and give you a real nice tire height stagger. Tire stagger is important and many screw this up. I cannot stand it when someone puts 18s on the back that are 26" tall, and 17s on the front that are 26" tall! it looks like the front tire is taller then the rear tires! The front tires need to be as much shorter as the rim, so if the rim is a 19 on the rear and a 18 on the front, the tire needs to be a inch shorter, at least!

The rears on this set up at 27.4" on a 19" rim will leave 4.2" of sidewall on the rears, a 26" tire height on the front on a 18" rim will leave a 4" sidewall. I HATE when the front tires have a taller sidewall then the rears, HATE IT! Did I mention I do not like that look?

Also, with this set up, you will have a consistant sidewall buldge that matches nicely from front to rear with a bit more buldge on the rear tires. The rears on this set up having a section width of 13.6" on a 12" rim and leaves a .8 buldge on either side of the rear rim. The front having a 11.3 section on a 10" rim leaves a .65 sidewall buldge on the fronts, which again is the look were going for.

Thank you again Frank for wery professional and understandable reply. This coming really hard to decide what way to go. I had allready made up my mind based on this car :



How do think 19" at rear would change the image? Do still get the same stance? I cant live with rake ie. car having nose down. And i do prefer some spring travel at rear too. I am looking for real driver wich i can take on track too.
__________________
63 Z06
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:16 AM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,691
Thanks: 86
Thanked 210 Times in 119 Posts
Default

My car that Frank is laying the clear on this week is running the 19/18 stagger with the 345/30/19 27.4" and 255/40/18 26". There were a few reasons I decided on this setup. When I ordered the wheels it was a pretty new deal, I wanted to keep the sidewalls as uniform as possible, and the vette and viper both staggered 19/18 at the time. I went with a coil over set up in the rear to get the car at the proper ride height. You can figure out your sidewall heights by multiplying the apect ratio times the width. 345 x .3 =103.5 255 x .4=102 This gives you a slightly larger sidewall int he rear. I hope to see the photos on my car soon! It's been almost a year since I bought those wheels. Unfortunately they sat around my previous builders shop and collected dust for a while.
__________________
Todd

Last edited by Vegas69; 01-15-2008 at 02:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-15-2008, 05:02 AM
Bowtieracing Bowtieracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,919
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vegas69
My car that Frank is laying the clear on this week is running the 19/18 stagger with the 345/30/19 27.4" and 255/40/18 26". There were a few reasons I decided on this setup. When I ordered the wheels it was a pretty new deal, I wanted to keep the sidewalls as uniform as possible, and the vette and viper both staggered 19/18 at the time. I went with a coil over set up in the rear to get the car at the proper ride height. You can figure out your sidewall heights by multiplying the apect ratio times the width. 345 x .3 =103.5 255 x .4=102 This gives you a slightly larger sidewall int he rear. I hope to see the photos on my car soon! It's been almost a year since I bought those wheels. Unfortunately they sat around my previous builders shop and collected dust for a while.
Thanks Vegas, i really look forward to see your car. This 18/19" is totally new idea for me so i cant wait to see some pics!
__________________
63 Z06
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-15-2008, 07:31 AM
Payton King's Avatar
Payton King Payton King is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,576
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
Default I like the 18/19 stagger and would do it again

I am runnng stock C6 rim and tire package, but I would keep the sizes is I ever changed rims...it just fits the car in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:20 AM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowtieracing
Thank you again Frank for wery professional and understandable reply. This coming really hard to decide what way to go. I had allready made up my mind based on this car :



How do think 19" at rear would change the image? Do still get the same stance? I cant live with rake ie. car having nose down. And i do prefer some spring travel at rear too. I am looking for real driver wich i can take on track too.
That is my customer Vance Wheelers car. Those are 18s
__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:35 AM
Bowtieracing Bowtieracing is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,919
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProdigyCustoms
That is my customer Vance Wheelers car. Those are 18s

I know , and Vances camaro has perfect stance ! I mean PERFECT
__________________
63 Z06
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-15-2008, 10:06 AM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

We have Lisa's car set up to ride so low I do not think we get a true perspective on how the rear tires work, I am going to get some pictures of Lisa's car raised up to the same height as Vance car for some pictures as most cars ride about that ride height. I think it would be good for rear tire size comparisons. I will try to do that later today.
__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-15-2008, 10:22 AM
NOVA NOVA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 427
Thanks: 17
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowtieracing
perfect stance ! I mean PERFECT
Stance is everything,period. oh and correct wheel offsets!
__________________
Forgelines - Ridetech - DSE Tubs - ZZ4/700R
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-15-2008, 11:45 AM
TravisB TravisB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NW arkansas
Posts: 1,472
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ProdigyCustoms
We have Lisa's car set up to ride so low I do not think we get a true perspective on how the rear tires work, I am going to get some pictures of Lisa's car raised up to the same height as Vance car for some pictures as most cars ride about that ride height. I think it would be good for rear tire size comparisons. I will try to do that later today.

that black car appears to sit lower the firebird......
__________________
Kenny Davis Hot Rods
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-15-2008, 11:52 AM
ProdigyCustoms ProdigyCustoms is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I think the FIrebird is 1 inch lower. These are 19s on the Firebird, so the rim is taller, but we are completely cupping the rims and the black car appears to be almost 2"s away from cupping the rims.

I am thinking it is the litterly the difference between black and white!




__________________
Frank Serafine
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net