...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-09-2008, 11:17 AM
Hotchkis Hotchkis is offline
senior member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Santa Fe Springs, CA
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post 67-69 Camaro/Firebird "Chassis Max Sway Bar Brace"

Part # 1415
MSRP: $201.95

We've just released an upgrade to the current 67-69 sway bar kit...
Link to product: http://www.hotchkis.net/p-824-67-69-...bar-brace.aspx




Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2008, 06:36 PM
class67's Avatar
class67 class67 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tracy, CA.
Posts: 385
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Aahhh, there we go! need a joe smoe to do a garage install and report back to everyone as to how easy it is....lol j/k.

I'll have to order one soon.
__________________

Steve
67 Camaro RS

66 Chevelle (in progress)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-16-2008, 06:50 PM
sik68's Avatar
sik68 sik68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 505
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

To Hotchkis (or others with knowledge of the chassis),

Do you consider the rear of the 1st generation F-bodies to be flimsy (for lack of a better term)? Relative to your subframe connectors (which I plan to purchase soon), how important do you consider this brace for chassis rigidity?
__________________
Steven

1968 Camaro: "TRACKDAY"

Build In Progress: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=10706
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-23-2008, 12:08 PM
Hotchkis Hotchkis is offline
senior member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Santa Fe Springs, CA
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sik68 View Post
To Hotchkis (or others with knowledge of the chassis),

Do you consider the rear of the 1st generation F-bodies to be flimsy (for lack of a better term)? Relative to your subframe connectors (which I plan to purchase soon), how important do you consider this brace for chassis rigidity?
The word flimsy definitely pertains to the Camaro chassis when you add high horsepower, super sticky tires and monster brakes. The Camaro is old, and that’s why we love them. The chassis was not designed to take the stress of state of the art performance parts. Back in the day, a full race set up was 400hp and relatively narrow bias ply racing tires. That was it! Now your typical well built street small block makes over 400hp before the power adders. Attach a few turbos, some clever ECU programming and over 1000 hp is a no brainer. Add some 265+ extreme performance tires, some massive aftermarket brakes, or even some really good brake pads/rotors, and your stock Camaro chassis doesn’t have a chance. Talk about twist and flex! Now you may never outfit your Camaro with these extreme go fast goodies, but increasing the grip level and adding a modest amount of power will over stress your stock chassis. Good subframe connectors add substantial strength by tying in the subframe to the leaf spring chassis pick up point. They also reinforce the pick up point which is a weak spot, especially due to the shock of hard launches. Finally, because many enthuiasts don’t want to cut their floor, you should look into subframe connectors that install without modifications to the floor structure. Bottom-line, well built subframe connectors are essential Camaro chassis reinforcements for drivers that enjoy spirited driving and honest chassis feedback. And of course, nobody likes chassis flex and body cracks.

Thanks for asking!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net