...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-02-2012, 06:34 PM
jsr69's Avatar
jsr69 jsr69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Middleton, Idaho
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default Help Deciding on a Fuel Injection System

Since cars are never “done”, the next step in the evolution is to lose the carb and go fuel injection. That is my dilemma at this point. Here is a link to the car and engine configuration.

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...ighlight=idaho

I was originally thinking of going with the Inglese 8-stack setup with a custom sheet metal manifold from Wilson. However, I’ve finally decided to go with a Precision Metalcraft manifold similar to this.

http://www.precision-metalcraft.com/Manifolds.html

I’ve done some reading on FAST EZ-EFI, their XFI, Accel, and others and I am at a total loss as to which direction to go. Several of you have had multiple experiences with EFI, so I’d like to get your thoughts and input as to which system I should use.

Thanks for any input, it is greatly appreciated.
__________________
Steve Spoor
69 Rally Sport with Quadra-Link, Wayne Due C-4 Subframe, T-56, 420 SB2.2

67 Chevelle, Art Morrison Chassis, 416 LS3, T-56 (under construction)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-02-2012, 08:17 PM
camcojb's Avatar
camcojb camcojb is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wilton, CA.
Posts: 12,897
Thanks: 5,509
Thanked 1,589 Times in 712 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsr69 View Post
Since cars are never “done”, the next step in the evolution is to lose the carb and go fuel injection. That is my dilemma at this point. Here is a link to the car and engine configuration.

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...ighlight=idaho

I was originally thinking of going with the Inglese 8-stack setup with a custom sheet metal manifold from Wilson. However, I’ve finally decided to go with a Precision Metalcraft manifold similar to this.

http://www.precision-metalcraft.com/Manifolds.html

I’ve done some reading on FAST EZ-EFI, their XFI, Accel, and others and I am at a total loss as to which direction to go. Several of you have had multiple experiences with EFI, so I’d like to get your thoughts and input as to which system I should use.

Thanks for any input, it is greatly appreciated.
I had that Precision manifold on my last car, loved it. Who will be doing the tuning? How many extra things do you want the EFI to run (nitrous, trans controller, etc.)?
__________________
Jody

PAST CAR PROJECTS

Like Lateral-G on Facebook!

Follow Lateral-G on Instagram!

SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Jacob Ehlers and Amsoil for the lubricants and degreasers for my 70 Chevelle project
Shannon at Modo Innovations for the cool billet DBW bracket
Roadster Shop for their Chevelle SPEC Chassis
Dakota Digital for their Chevelle HDX Gauge Package
Painless Performance for their wiring harness

Ron Davis Radiators for their radiator and fan assembly.
Baer Brakes for their front and rear brakes

Texas Speed and Performance for their 427 LS Stroker
American Powertrain for their ProFit Magnum T56 kit
Currie Enterprises for their 9" Third Member
Forgeline for their GF3 Wheels
McLeod Racing for their RXT street twin clutch
Ididit for their steering column
Holley for their EFI and engine parts
Lokar and Clayton Machine for their pedals and door and window handles
Morris Classic Concepts for their 3 point belts and side mirrors
Thermotec for their heat sleeve and sound deadening products
Restomod Air for their Tru Mod A/C kit
Mightymouse Solutions for their catch can
Magnaflow for their 3" exhaust system
Aeromotive for their dual Phantom fuel system
Vintage Air for their new Mid Mount LS front drive
Hydratech Braking for their hydroboost system
Borgeson for their stainless steering shaft and u joints
Eddie Motorsports for their hood and trunk hinges and misc parts
TMI Products for their seats, door panels, and dash pad
Rock Valley Antique Auto Parts for their stainless fuel tank
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-2012, 09:52 PM
Mike Norris Mike Norris is offline
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 98
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

As Jody mentioned, that manifold looks great and works very well.

I also echo what Jody as far as the question about who is doing the tuning as that can and will play a large part in things.

Besides the questions of what all else do you want it to run (nitrous, forced induction, etc.) you must also figure if you are using a drive by cable or drive by wire TB setup. There are only a couple systems I use that run drive by wire TB's.

Mike Norris
__________________
Mike Norris Motorsports
Raymonds Performance
3828 Clarks Creek Road
Plainfield, IN 46168
407-616-2518
www.mikenorrismotorsports.com
[email protected]
Visit Our Facebook Page
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2012, 10:21 PM
badmatt's Avatar
badmatt badmatt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 725
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

For the SB2?

Electromotive Tec 3R If it were me everything in one box ignition and all.

BS3 is another good one PRO EFI is a great choice as well.
__________________
97 Sonoma "NERA": Pile O Sh*t. Literally.

Last edited by badmatt; 07-02-2012 at 10:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2012, 10:09 AM
jsr69's Avatar
jsr69 jsr69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Middleton, Idaho
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default

Jody & Mike

Good questions. As far as who will be doing the tuning, I don't know as I hadn't thought of that yet. Another reason for posting here. I'm not aware of anyone in the Boise, Idaho area that specializes in tuning injection. That will be part of today's agenda. As far as what else it will run, I don't plan on adding nitrous, or boost and I"m sticking with the T-56, so no auto. I plan to run the throttle by cable.

Again, thanks for any info you can pass along. It is greatly appreciated.
__________________
Steve Spoor
69 Rally Sport with Quadra-Link, Wayne Due C-4 Subframe, T-56, 420 SB2.2

67 Chevelle, Art Morrison Chassis, 416 LS3, T-56 (under construction)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2012, 02:14 PM
supremeefi supremeefi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Central fl
Posts: 180
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

If you're going to drive it then the Accel, it has the most extensive maps that relate to good drivability. If you want extensive datalogging etc. I'd do the BS3.
The FAST EZ stuff has it's applications as well but don't underestimate being able to control spark, especially where you live. More spark when it's cold will allow it to drive much better. Also the ability for individual cylinder trim, and you don't necessarily need a dyno to utilize that feature.

The EZ systems don't have spark control and run a bit richer to try to deliver comparable drivability vs a sequential system like the Accel or XFI with full tunability. But imo the EZ stuff is no match for a well tuned sequential system on an IR type intake.
__________________
Mark
Engine builder and tuner.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-03-2012, 05:24 PM
214Chevy's Avatar
214Chevy 214Chevy is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: DALLAS, Texas
Posts: 4,659
Thanks: 398
Thanked 628 Times in 392 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeefi View Post
If you're going to drive it then the Accel....
Supremeefi, I also plan to drive my car. It is strictly a driver, 100%...no track time whatsoever. But, I was just gonna use a GM computer. Is this not a good idea. I'm using DBW.
__________________
'68 C10 swb
'69 Camaro convertible
'72 Chevelle

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-03-2012, 05:29 PM
jsr69's Avatar
jsr69 jsr69 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Middleton, Idaho
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeefi View Post
If you're going to drive it then the Accel, it has the most extensive maps that relate to good drivability. If you want extensive datalogging etc. I'd do the BS3.
The FAST EZ stuff has it's applications as well but don't underestimate being able to control spark, especially where you live. More spark when it's cold will allow it to drive much better. Also the ability for individual cylinder trim, and you don't necessarily need a dyno to utilize that feature.

The EZ systems don't have spark control and run a bit richer to try to deliver comparable drivability vs a sequential system like the Accel or XFI with full tunability. But imo the EZ stuff is no match for a well tuned sequential system on an IR type intake.
Mark

Thanks for the info. I have been concerned about the EZ system not having spark control and for that reason hadn't jump yet. I'll spend some more time looking at the Accel.
__________________
Steve Spoor
69 Rally Sport with Quadra-Link, Wayne Due C-4 Subframe, T-56, 420 SB2.2

67 Chevelle, Art Morrison Chassis, 416 LS3, T-56 (under construction)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-03-2012, 05:40 PM
64duece 64duece is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Holley HP EFI.....
__________________
Dennis
Moore Racecraft
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net