...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Mark Stielow Builds
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 08-04-2019, 09:03 PM
MtotheIKEo MtotheIKEo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reno,NV
Posts: 291
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Default

Nice upgrade! Did you get lucky with the rotor and caliper offset matching the original offset? Or was there some spacers/milling to make it work?
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 08-05-2019, 12:25 AM
jeff71 jeff71 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 393
Thanks: 4
Thanked 61 Times in 40 Posts
Default

Stock spindle? I'm surprised those Detroit Steel wheels required so little balance weight.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 08-05-2019, 10:54 AM
Stielow's Avatar
Stielow Stielow is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,509
Thanks: 29
Thanked 2,223 Times in 601 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MtotheIKEo View Post
Nice upgrade! Did you get lucky with the rotor and caliper offset matching the original offset? Or was there some spacers/milling to make it work?


No I had to use CCP spindles that have a nice boss to build a adaptor off of.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Stielow Engineering
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 08-05-2019, 10:56 AM
Stielow's Avatar
Stielow Stielow is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,509
Thanks: 29
Thanked 2,223 Times in 601 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff71 View Post
Stock spindle? I'm surprised those Detroit Steel wheels required so little balance weight.


No a CCP spindle with a drop built in


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Stielow Engineering
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 08-06-2019, 11:18 AM
Ketzer's Avatar
Ketzer Ketzer is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Eads, TN.
Posts: 1,446
Thanks: 330
Thanked 151 Times in 104 Posts
Default

I have read mixed reviews on the CPP stuff in general, ie quality issues. Glad to hear a real world use ! It's really tough trying to sort through reviews and figure out whos giving honest opinions.

Jeff-
__________________
You remind me of the timing on a turbo engine...
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 08-06-2019, 02:29 PM
ScotI ScotI is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 673
Thanks: 77
Thanked 207 Times in 140 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ketzer View Post
I have read mixed reviews on the CPP stuff in general, ie quality issues. Glad to hear a real world use ! It's really tough trying to sort through reviews and figure out whos giving honest opinions.

Jeff-
Honestly.... They (the peoples opinions of CPP) probably all are. CPP is hit & miss. Some stuff is good as is. Some stuff not so much. The follow-up when you (the little guy/John Q. Public) do have an issue leaves you wondering how they remain in business.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 08-12-2019, 09:17 AM
Stielow's Avatar
Stielow Stielow is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,509
Thanks: 29
Thanked 2,223 Times in 601 Posts
Default



I added 2018 Tahoe brake booster and master. I cut the brake booster brackets off the 1978 Blazer booster. The amazing thing is the rivet pattern matched the 2018 Tahoe booster. I changed the angle and it bolted up. I had to rework the brake booster rods but over all fairly straight forward.

Mark


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Stielow Engineering
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 08-12-2019, 10:07 AM
ScotI ScotI is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 673
Thanks: 77
Thanked 207 Times in 140 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stielow View Post


I added 2018 Tahoe brake booster and master. I cut the brake booster brackets off the 1978 Blazer booster. The amazing thing is the rivet pattern matched the 2018 Tahoe booster. I changed the angle and it bolted up. I had to rework the brake booster rods but over all fairly straight forward.

Mark


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Curious.... Was this to simply keep the paired components together or is there some specific benefit to using the 2018 Tahoe booster vs. a 78 version?
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 08-12-2019, 10:39 AM
Stielow's Avatar
Stielow Stielow is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,509
Thanks: 29
Thanked 2,223 Times in 601 Posts
Default

Brake pedal feel. By putting the booster and master together and coping the pedal ratio of the Tahoe the brake pedal feel should be the same as the Tahoe. The only wild card is how keeping the rear drum brakes will effect things. If it is not good I’ll add the dicks to the back.

The 1978 booster had very poor brake pedal feel.

I also wanted the look of the modern booster and master.

To further update the truck I also added the Detroit Speed wiper motor and windshield squirters.

Hope to drive it as soon as I put the seats back in it. They are out getting redone with Chevy Highland Plaid material.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Stielow Engineering
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 08-12-2019, 12:38 PM
bdahlg68's Avatar
bdahlg68 bdahlg68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 474
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stielow View Post
If it is not good I’ll add the dicks to the back.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lmao you are going to do what?!?!?!

Damn autocorrect!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Brian

1968 Pontiac Firebird
1989 Ford Mustang
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net