...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1171  
Old 07-06-2013, 12:05 AM
carbuff's Avatar
carbuff carbuff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 1,320
Thanks: 15
Thanked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Does this discussion mean that I'm gonna stop hearing about putting 335's on the back of my car?!
  #1172  
Old 07-06-2013, 12:08 AM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,723
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carbuff View Post
Does this discussion mean that I'm gonna stop hearing about putting 335's on the back of my car?!
No You chose smaller out of fear not out of engineering concerns. That doesn't count
__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171

  #1173  
Old 07-06-2013, 12:38 AM
Ron Sutton's Avatar
Ron Sutton Ron Sutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,422
Thanks: 45
Thanked 35 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt.A View Post
Hey Ron, another question for you...

You mentioned that in Gaetano's case he might as well have just thrown 275 tires on the back of the car instead of the 315s because he would need to remove the 15.x percent more grip that the 315s added in order to get the car balanced again.

My question is, if you're working with more tire in the back versus the front, can you tune the rear to have more grip in the straights and less under steady state cornering?

When you discussed the pros and cons of high roll/low pitch versus high roll/low pitch, I was curious if you could run one setup on the front and the other on the rear. I feel like there is a reason you haven't mentioned doing this, but if you have the time, it would be cool if you could explain what would happen from running low roll/high pitch in the front and high roll/low pitch in the back.

Thanks for all the time you've spent sharing knowledge with us amateur hour club guys

Matt
Hey Matt, I enjoy helping.

I'm outta here for a week, so I'll discuss that when I get back.

Everyone take care.
__________________
Ron Sutton Race Technology
  #1174  
Old 07-06-2013, 02:12 AM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 158 Times in 104 Posts
Default

Ron, thank you getting this thread out of the toilet and back into some really good discussion. I might need to "rent" you to come fix my disaster of a build thread....

As others have said, I enjoy and appreciate the wealth of info you're sharing.
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
  #1175  
Old 07-06-2013, 09:50 AM
Wissing72's Avatar
Wissing72 Wissing72 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Mckinleyville, ca.
Posts: 283
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wow Rob, I go away for a couple of weeks and the car has come together quite a lot! Looks good.
The tire/wheel info was way too much for this early in the morning but glad it is there to re-read. Thanks.
__________________


Chris
70 Chevelle. Roadster Shop Chassis, The shop llc/ Jon Lind interior LS3/6speed. Thanks to Precision Classics and Collision Eugene, Or. http://precision-classics.com/
Build thread:https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=39517
  #1176  
Old 07-06-2013, 10:10 AM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,723
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash68 View Post
Ron, thank you getting this thread out of the toilet and back into some really good discussion. I might need to "rent" you to come fix my disaster of a build thread....

As others have said, I enjoy and appreciate the wealth of info you're sharing.
Flash I think you've done more to accomplish that than anyone by staying off the thread recently.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gmtech921 View Post
Wow Rob, I go away for a couple of weeks and the car has come together quite a lot! Looks good.
The tire/wheel info was way too much for this early in the morning but glad it is there to re-read. Thanks.
Thanks I'm making progress and have some more things in the works that I'll be posting on in a few weeks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Sutton View Post
On track width (center of tread to center of tread for any readers not familiar) … the optimum F/R TW split falls somewhere in the window of -1” to +1” depending on the cars weight distribution & suspension travel strategy. When a car has significantly more front weight distribution … say 53-56% … the front naturally wants to roll more than the rear. Having the front track width a little wider helps balance the car’s roll angle. I don’t like to have the front TW more than 1” wider than the rear, on the roll angle balance goes the other direction & the car wants to roll over on the outside rear tire too much.

With the much wider rear tires moving the rear TW "in" ... I suspect your rear track width is substantially narrower than your front & will contribute to things that cause a push condition. You should measure both front & rear track widths & post the info. If the rear is more than 1” narrower than the front … and if you care about this … then you would want to narrow the FTW, or widen the RTW or a balance of both.

In case this is new to anyone, Wider front TW than rear = tightens the car … too much makes it push. Wider rear TW than front = frees the car … too much makes it loose. If the car has more rear weight, I may, or may not, run the rear wider than the front. It does depend on if the suspension travel strategy is “high roll/low pitch” or “low roll/high pitch”.
Ron flew the coop for a week so until he gets back I'm taking a break from the tire/handling discussion. I have some more info on track width and such to throw out there for discussion.

I did take track width into consideration when choosing the tire wheel package. My front comes in at 55.25" and the rear at 58" Ron was surprised by this since it is intuitive to think tubbing in the rear would push the track width in significantly. I had to remind him what you all know. My car has a big but. So more tire to the inside of the fender would have widened the gap in front to rear track. Currently I have 1.75" more TW in the rear which should help free the back end up some even with the 345s.

I don't think I ever see anyone post about it. What is the typical TW measurement on a first gen Camaro?
__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171

  #1177  
Old 07-06-2013, 11:26 AM
intocarss's Avatar
intocarss intocarss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: So Cal in the Sfv
Posts: 4,257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

HEY FT... Is it done yet??? Am I drunk, what's with the pink elephant????

Maybe we all should stay out of BMF's thread so he can finish

Thanks for the write up Mr Ron
__________________
If it ain't buckin, chirpin & makin all kinds of bad noises, then I ain't happy

Accelerating is optional...........stopping is mandatory. Your car WILL stop one way or another.
  #1178  
Old 07-06-2013, 11:49 AM
FETorino's Avatar
FETorino FETorino is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,723
Thanks: 59
Thanked 63 Times in 21 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by intocarss View Post
HEY FT... Is it done yet???
You know better than to ask that question.


Quote:
Originally Posted by intocarss View Post
Am I drunk, what's with the pink elephant????
I don't know what you are talking about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by intocarss View Post
Maybe we all should stay out of BMF's thread so he can finish
Doesn't matter. He can multi task. He is quite capable of doing nothing on the car and posting simultaneously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by intocarss View Post
Thanks for the write up Mr Ron
Can't wait till he gets back and the fun continues.

__________________
Rob in SoCal

https://lateral-g.net/forums/show...10645&page=171

  #1179  
Old 07-06-2013, 04:50 PM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 158 Times in 104 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FETorino View Post
Flash I think you've done more to accomplish that than anyone by staying off the thread recently.



That's giving me an awful lot of credit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FETorino View Post





I don't think I ever see anyone post about it. What is the typical TW measurement on a first gen Camaro?
Good question ... I would guess pretty close to yours.

Quote:
Originally Posted by carbuff View Post
Does this discussion mean that I'm gonna stop hearing about putting 335's on the back of my car?!
Only if you put 315's on the front.
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
  #1180  
Old 07-06-2013, 05:04 PM
tubbed69's Avatar
tubbed69 tubbed69 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,132
Thanks: 8
Thanked 39 Times in 35 Posts
Default

wheels are very nice Rob
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net