...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Wheels and Tires
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-30-2006, 10:55 AM
HAULNSS's Avatar
HAULNSS HAULNSS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wink

I run Wilwood 4 pistons on the front of my Impala SS. I got a good deal using my car as a 'prototype', but have really started to enjoy the benefits of good brakes.

I like the Wilwood drop in pads. Remove one allen bolt and the pads drop in from the top of the caliper. Wilwood also has an extensive line of pads for many applications. I have a low dust quite pad for the street and a more aggressive pad for the track (more dust, some noise and works great when hot). The pads are pretty thick, too. I haven't wore out a set yet.

The Wilwoods really increased the amount of time I can spend on the track. At BIR (3.1 mile course), I can get an extra 3-4 laps out of the brakes (compared to stock) before I start to get the spongy feeling.

Now, for most guys, I would imagine they will never work the car to the point of worrying about brake fade and heat. Any decent caliper and rotor upgrade should be sufficient, as long as the fluid is changed regularly. Just a simple fluid flush would make a noticable difference in the resistance to fading for most people.

If you are going to upgrade, make sure to use good calipers, good rotors, good fluid and a suitable pad. The best brake setup will still suck with old crappy fluid and cheap pads.

Personally, I also avoid the crossdrilled rotors. I have witnessed too many crack when they 'connect the dots' and several have broken in pieces after a hard track run. They look good for the eye candy on the street, but most aren't up to the task of hard track use.

There is my long winded 2 cents on brake upgrades. Whew!

Randy
__________________
1995 Impala SS
T56 Six Speed, Wilwoods, Tri-y's,...
1964 Riviera
31k miles
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-30-2006, 12:27 PM
fatlife's Avatar
fatlife fatlife is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71Nova
Just in case anyone does not know what calipers we are talking about here is a picture I stole from chevrolet.com and the text that was with it.

"Corvette Z06 employs monoblock six-piston front calipers and four-piston rear calipers. Each piston utilizes its own pad. The opposing pistons operate in pairs, applying brake pressure equally to each side of the rotor. The extra-large 14-inch front rotors and 13.4-inch rears are vented and cross-drilled. Brake cooling ducts are capable of moving twice the amount of cooling air compared to the previous-generation Z06.
You mean these?

These brakes are the ultimate in bling, 6 piston caliper with 14" rotors. Too bad the front rotors weigh like 28 ilbs and one of them vents backwards since the left and right rotors are identical yet have directional venting Second, they have bad pad wear, the multi pad setup works great on bikes, but apparantly sucks with these, the pads wear with huge taper. Plus a good set of pads (stock GM ones belong in the garbage) are like $400 front and rear. They look killer but thats about it, if you look closely there is a C5 caliper in the background which was put back on the car after taking these brand new ones off.

Also the original poster did not say anything about Z06 brakes, are you sure that is what he is talking about? If you are interested, I have more pics and more info about these, but unless you are running really big wheels, and want boat anchor rotors, and pads that dont wear right stay away from them.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-30-2006, 12:38 PM
fatlife's Avatar
fatlife fatlife is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Also for summary;
F body LS1 brakes-= 2 piston sliding caliper, same as C5 but with no cooling fins built into caliper body, 12" rotor, 12" rear

C5 brakes= 2 piston sliding caliper with 12.8" directional rotor front
1 piston sliding caliper with 12" directional rotor rear

C5 Z06 identical to C5 but with red calipers

C6 brakes= same is C5

C6 brakes with optional Z51= same calipers as C5, differnet abutments(bracket) with a 13.4" front directional rotor, but same rotor left and right meaning that one side will be backwards, meaning that it will not cool the same as the other side. They are crossdrilled also.
Rear is same caliper as C5 but with differnet abutment, 13" directioal but same as the front 2 of the same side rotor, same cooling problems.

C6 Zo6= 6 Piston monoblock individual brake padlets calipers, 14" crossdrilled directional rotor, same rotor left and right meaning one side will be backwards, will not cool the same left and right.
Rear is a 4 piston monoblock individual brake padlets caliper, 13.5" crossdrilled rotor same directional problem as front
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-30-2006, 01:15 PM
Weaver Weaver is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

How much for the touring classics and can they handle 18 and 20 inch wheels?

thanks,

Weaver

Quote:
Originally Posted by T Bell
for me, the Touring Classics are the way to go and mine won't see many track days. But I think fatlife summed it up. It's mainly for looks. And ssssssh don't tell everybody about the low price of them. Atleast until I get mine. You are spoiling it for everyone.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-30-2006, 02:03 PM
rwhite692's Avatar
rwhite692 rwhite692 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fatlife
... Too bad the front rotors weigh like 28 ilbs

With a larger diameter, (thicker also? not sure) rotor, would it not make sense that it would weigh more than the C5?
__________________
______________________________________________
1969 Camaro/ Tom Nelson TT 434 / Wayne Due C5 / DSE QLink / and a bunch of other stuff...

Project update thread here:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=12743

My Lateral-G Page

My Shop Build:

http://www.garagejournal.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=16310
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-30-2006, 02:34 PM
fatlife's Avatar
fatlife fatlife is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwhite692
With a larger diameter, (thicker also? not sure) rotor, would it not make sense that it would weigh more than the C5?
Well this huge piece of casting on the back of the rotor could be a reason! I know that stoptech 14" rotors are only like 18 ilbs.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-30-2006, 03:59 PM
rwhite692's Avatar
rwhite692 rwhite692 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 1,912
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'm sure that the additional metal is there for a reason. That much material can sink a lot of heat....
__________________
______________________________________________
1969 Camaro/ Tom Nelson TT 434 / Wayne Due C5 / DSE QLink / and a bunch of other stuff...

Project update thread here:
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=12743

My Lateral-G Page

My Shop Build:

http://www.garagejournal.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=16310
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-30-2006, 04:49 PM
fatlife's Avatar
fatlife fatlife is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 353
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

if thats true then why don't any of the top manufactures use huge 10ilb cast iron centers? Why use thin light weight aluminum? And if were going with this logic, why have 2 left hand side rotors????? Trust me, I thought they were going to be great also, but I finally realized that they were no good. All of the Z06 guys dump these brakes and go with something better if they plan on beating on the car.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-30-2006, 05:04 PM
71Nova 71Nova is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Good info. I thought c6 brakes were Z06 brakes. I guess the 2 pistons are the standard c6 brakes. I did not realise the venting is backwards on one side, and that they used a big casting for the disk instead of using an aluminum hat. Thanks for posting the more detailed pics because I was curious but did not know the details on the new monoblock. Looks like other monoblock calipers such as the Baer 6s have some advantages.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-31-2006, 01:17 AM
Vince@Meanstreets's Avatar
Vince@Meanstreets Vince@Meanstreets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 5,532
Thanks: 13
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Default z06

those calipers, ceramic pads and slotted rotors would work just fine. FL did you dump those yet?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net