...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > EFI and Forced Induction
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-06-2008, 07:09 AM
TopEndeR TopEndeR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJW32
A tech over at fast said that the EZ Fast system will not work with boost.

Not what I wanted to hear
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-06-2008, 12:43 PM
Mick Mc's Avatar
Mick Mc Mick Mc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 356
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Is that ANY boost?
Blow thru, draw thru...
Maybe there is no reference for boost...


Mick
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-06-2008, 01:11 PM
Jr's Avatar
Jr Jr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: so cal
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I asked about the weiand and magnacharger.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-08-2008, 09:38 PM
speedshopmike's Avatar
speedshopmike speedshopmike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: more or less east coastish
Posts: 120
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

the new system uses alpha-N strategy.
it can not read boost (or vacuum)
it chases a targeted air/fuel ratio via wideband o2 sensor.

the new PP system looks an *awful* lot like retrotek's system...i suspect they're collaborating on producing it.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-02-2008, 01:16 PM
sacarguy sacarguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 201
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default k

Quote:
Originally Posted by mazspeed View Post
I'm curious if that will work with a blown application.
it wont work because this system uses a wide band to shoot for a set air fuel ratio target and then the computer continualy adjusts the numbers in the fuel table vs map ..

problem is thats no where near fast enough for blown aplications. and there is no boost reference to know what to do with the timing it simply is timing vs rpm just like a old fasioned ditributor
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-28-2008, 11:50 AM
mrg mrg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Is this system available yet? Has anybody had a chance to try it out?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-05-2009, 05:39 AM
tones2SS's Avatar
tones2SS tones2SS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8,176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Question Question for you guys

So, bear with me here guys, if someone has a carbuerted engine, they can convert with their system with the handheld device, swapping out some componets, such as the throttle body, fuel rails and such, and make it fuel injected?
WOW!!! Pretty impressive!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-05-2009, 08:31 AM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tones2SS View Post
So, bear with me here guys, if someone has a carbuerted engine, they can convert with their system with the handheld device, swapping out some componets, such as the throttle body, fuel rails and such, and make it fuel injected?
WOW!!! Pretty impressive!
Except that you are still asking wet fuel to make it through the intake manifold evenly to eight cylinders with different length and configuration intake runner paths. The advantage of multiport fuel injection is that the only thing going through the intake manifold is air, with the fuel being injected right above the intake valve. If you're really looking for the advantages of EFI, I think multiport is still the way to go.

You also need to do a certain amount of plumbing and fuel tank modifications (EFI engines don't like interruptions in fuel supply).

I'm a big fan of EFI (have it on my SBC), but think that some of the "shortcuts" may compromise a little too much for not a big monetary savings.

Now a true self tuning multiport system? I'm all over that!
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-05-2009, 09:02 AM
tones2SS's Avatar
tones2SS tones2SS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8,176
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mkelcy View Post
Except that you are still asking wet fuel to make it through the intake manifold evenly to eight cylinders with different length and configuration intake runner paths. The advantage of multiport fuel injection is that the only thing going through the intake manifold is air, with the fuel being injected right above the intake valve. If you're really looking for the advantages of EFI, I think multiport is still the way to go.

You also need to do a certain amount of plumbing and fuel tank modifications (EFI engines don't like interruptions in fuel supply).

I'm a big fan of EFI (have it on my SBC), but think that some of the "shortcuts" may compromise a little too much for not a big monetary savings.

Now a true self tuning multiport system? I'm all over that!
I guess my next question would be, would it still run properly with the "switch-over"? Sounds like you said about the EFI not liking the interruptions in fuel supply. Thanks for the info!!!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-05-2009, 09:57 AM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tones2SS View Post
I guess my next question would be, would it still run properly with the "switch-over"? Sounds like you said about the EFI not liking the interruptions in fuel supply. Thanks for the info!!!
EFI systems require much higher fuel pressures than carbs. LT1's (and the Holley Commander 950 that I use) like about 44 lbs, factory LSx's are up in the low 60's. In an EFI system, there's no fuel bowl as there is with a carb, so any interruption in fuel pressure is immediately felt in fuel starvation to the engine. Becuase they have the fuel bowl, carbed systems can tolerate the fuel supply pickup momentarily sucking air in a low fuel conditions, not so much with an EFI system. As a result, fuel tanks intended for EFI applications are at a minimum sumped, and should also be baffled to keep fuel around the fuel pickup at all times. In addition, because electric fuel pumps are noisy, most fuel tanks intended for EFI also have internal fuel pumps.

The best deal I've seen on a sumped, pumped EFI fuel tank is the Spectra tank: http://www.rockauto.com/catalog/cata...MIUM%2BGM32AFI. Although it's not specified, my guess (and that's all it is) is that the pump in this tank is of the 44 lb. variety.

I don't know if I answered your question.
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net