...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-19-2008, 05:42 PM
LCAC_Man LCAC_Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oceanside, CA.
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MtotheIKEo View Post
Note that there is a difference in a 500hp carb'd gen I motor and a 500hp LSx. Older motors get a little more rowdy when you start pushing the hp up. They are not as refined as a newer LSx with fuel injection.
X2, I'm running a 450hp 406 Gen1, even tamed it with hyd roller cam, fastburns and a well spec'd converter, but, it's still pretty uncivilized with my auto trans. A T56 would probably make it a little easier to deal with. Gen III/IV is a totally different story....
__________________
Len
67 Camaro SS350 Convertible
406/200r4
Len's PT Garage
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-19-2008, 06:12 PM
The T-man The T-man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 381
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MtotheIKEo View Post
Note that there is a difference in a 500hp carb'd gen I motor and a 500hp LSx. Older motors get a little more rowdy when you start pushing the hp up. They are not as refined as a newer LSx with fuel injection.
Now THIS is an answer tying into what they are trying to tell me,
althought I am looking at EFI for it
it is Gen1 small block, a Dart Little M to be exact

500+ torque is the first goal, and if I can squeeze 500 HP by 5500 rpm or so I will be happy

Last edited by The T-man; 11-19-2008 at 07:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-08-2009, 08:12 PM
The T-man The T-man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 381
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

any cam recomendations for 450-500 HP w/ a 406 SBC?

10to1 comp,
TPiS MiniRAM intake
AFR 210's
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-09-2009, 01:29 AM
andrewmp6 andrewmp6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 641
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You can street drive anything if your crazy enough.Yes some new cars come with that much power but look at the whole car and its weight also.I daily drive a 68 mustang with a 460 small block its fine tell its stop and go traffic it idles kinda lumpy.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-09-2009, 05:36 AM
chevyIIpost's Avatar
chevyIIpost chevyIIpost is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Posts: 150
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Make the horse power with the heads. AFR 210 heads with 2.100 intake valves and comp porting. Comp cams 236/240 @.050 .600 lift. hyd roller. The big bore of the 406 won't shroud the big valve and it will help the flow numbers. The cam will make it streetable with a broad power band.
__________________
Ted Rea
"Don't drive FASTER than your guardian angel can fly"
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-10-2009, 07:25 PM
olds olds is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I could see why your shop would say a 406 stroker is overkill or overpriced, whichever. You could make the same HP with a 383, or even a 350 and it would save tons of money. You wouldn't have nearly the same torque, but why would you need it? I'll have about 3,500$ in my 383 and I guestimate it will have between 470-520 hp/tq. It's really a mild build, perfect for the street, and built to handle throughout the entire streetable RPM range (not too much top end or too much low end).

^^AFR 210's are a bit overkill, I would build a 383 with AFR 195cc intake runners - they outclass anything else in that size range hands down.

You could run a 700 hp motor on the street, it's not the power that matters, it's a question of where the power is delivered in the RPM range and how effective the power is put on the ground without losing too much driveability. In my opinion, I wouldn't want less than 500hp out of my SBC or why would I spend that kinda money.

edit - as for reliability, I would guess they're referencing to the huge bore, downgrade to a 383 then you won't have the cooling and structural problems. Also for mileage - that has nothing to do with the engine, it's gearing and airflow.

Last edited by olds; 02-10-2009 at 07:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-24-2009, 08:50 PM
67ss&99ss 67ss&99ss is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

505 hp 506 ft lb pump gas 406 here. Close to 11:1 static, 8.2:1 dynamic compression. AFR 195 eliminators, and a comp cams XE 284 hydraulic flat tappet cam. Can provide other specifics if needed. Idles good at 800 and has no problems pushing the 67 down the road. As long as its over 2k rpm when going down the road, its happy. Runs 170-180*.
__________________
Andy
67 Camaro SS 406|M20
69 C/10 350|Turbo 350
72 Nova 350|Turbo 350
74 Cuda 340|A833|Dana 60
99 Camaro SS LS1|Auto
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net