Quote:
Originally Posted by amber@ridetech
Some of the benefits of a remote reservoir shock are increased fluid capacity, 
|
Number one gain IMO. A shock, being a fluid controlled device benefits from more fluid. Heat issues aside. You covered that already

Thanks.
A fluid is incompressible (for the most part) so you would think a larger volume of fluid in the shock wouldnt make any diff, and it doesnt, in the shock. Its gonna react to the changes it sees with any amount of fluid. But.... It is still subjected to aeration, call it contamination of the fluid with the gas in the system.
So with a larger volume of fluid the gas "contamination" can be limited to a remote reservoir, out of the shock body. Yeah, you will still have aeration in the reservoir, but it is much less than in the shock body where all the action is and the design of the shock causes some dramatic turbulence, if the gas head is right there, in the shock it will cause some contamination . If the reservoir is made correctly then it can be held to a very small amount of turbulence. Verses the turbulence of a shock body.
Mixing of the gas and oil is a bad thing in the shock body. So if you can make a remote reservoir that lends itself to a less active environment then the gas stays in its area and the oil stays in its area. So now you have the shock operating in a completely gas free (no bubbles) fluid, thats a GOOD thing...
As far as I figure LOL Im not a shock guy so what the hell

Just seat of the pants feeling for me. The tech folks like Amber have the real issues laid out.

JR