...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Off Topic Forums
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-07-2010, 01:59 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6spdcamaro View Post
It definitely seems legitimate to me too. I would just like to see how it performs when it has to carry around a 3000-4000 pound car. It is definitely an innovative design
If you watch the videos -- they're talking BIG 18 WHEELERS not little puny ass cars! LOL

I think it's one of those "how fast do you want to go" kinda engines.... if it's a diesel replacement - they're talking cleaner - lighter - more efficient...

And then they mention as a gas engine for "hybrid" cars -- so different strokes (so to speak) for different folks.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-30-2010, 07:58 PM
68bird 68bird is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default scudari

that is a remarkable bit of engineering. watching the video, one thing comes to mind. the output performance of this thing can be taylored using nothing but electric over air valves. if all of the firing cylinders are fed by a common air tank (or plenum) then the pumping cylinders can be of different sizes and compression ratios. this would allow the valves to open or close air into these bigger or higher compression pumping cylinders under load or for acceleration raising the common plenum air pressure (think turbo boost) raising performance and or volume or air. this would also allow them to be shut off with little to no drag under normal driving. the performance and effeciency options look to be endless. this has the potential to outperform turbos or blowers and make traction on take off infinetly controllable. damn technology is cool. direct injection seems to be the secret for making the old designs seem groundbreaking.

years ago my shop teacher challenged us to try to design an engine with oval pistons, enabling the ability to use two rods per cylinder, stabilizing the piston and reducing skirt loads. as many valves as you could squeeze in. he then told us that someone had tried to do this. i have never been able to find any info. have any one of you ever heard of this. if he was full of s##t at least he got us to think for 9 weeks and it has challenged me since.
__________________
1968 firebird 427 chevy th400
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-30-2010, 08:14 PM
70rs's Avatar
70rs 70rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Washington State
Posts: 3,683
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68bird View Post
that is a remarkable bit of engineering. watching the video, one thing comes to mind. the output performance of this thing can be taylored using nothing but electric over air valves. if all of the firing cylinders are fed by a common air tank (or plenum) then the pumping cylinders can be of different sizes and compression ratios. this would allow the valves to open or close air into these bigger or higher compression pumping cylinders under load or for acceleration raising the common plenum air pressure (think turbo boost) raising performance and or volume or air. this would also allow them to be shut off with little to no drag under normal driving. the performance and effeciency options look to be endless. this has the potential to outperform turbos or blowers and make traction on take off infinetly controllable. damn technology is cool. direct injection seems to be the secret for making the old designs seem groundbreaking.

years ago my shop teacher challenged us to try to design an engine with oval pistons, enabling the ability to use two rods per cylinder, stabilizing the piston and reducing skirt loads. as many valves as you could squeeze in. he then told us that someone had tried to do this. i have never been able to find any info. have any one of you ever heard of this. if he was full of s##t at least he got us to think for 9 weeks and it has challenged me since.
EDIT. I found it. It started in 1979 with a 500cc oval piston racer. The NR750 was the street version. VERY limited production. You can still buy one (used) on the open market if you want.

Honda did it with some race bikes. If I remember it was the NR750. And they had a few street versions (not sire if it was ONLY prototype or limited production) Look up HRC NR750. Pretty cool stuff. And it worked well enough to win a few races too. VERY high RPM and decent power for the displacement.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Eric

1970 Camaro.....on the road someday!

Last edited by 70rs; 03-30-2010 at 08:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-30-2010, 08:27 PM
68bird 68bird is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default scudari

thanks 70rs.
hard to beleive i missed those bikes. wonder why it didn't take off. probably hard to seal the long side of the piston ring. damn, that shop teacher never told us where or who. thought he just made it up to keep us thinking he was a auto god. lol
__________________
1968 firebird 427 chevy th400
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-30-2010, 09:18 PM
6spdcamaro 6spdcamaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 242
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wouldn't ovular pistons lead to detonation? I don't know a lot about engines but in my simple mind, thats what I come up with.
__________________
Ken
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-31-2010, 12:23 PM
70rs's Avatar
70rs 70rs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Washington State
Posts: 3,683
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6spdcamaro View Post
Wouldn't ovular pistons lead to detonation? I don't know a lot about engines but in my simple mind, thats what I come up with.
I would think all of the same factors that come into play with a traditional round piston would count. And maybe a few more. But I think if you had the compression, cyl pressure, fuel, timing, spark intensity....you should be able to dial it in without any detonation.?
__________________
Eric

1970 Camaro.....on the road someday!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net