...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-10-2010, 08:55 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

As a long time mid year 'Vette guy.... A '64 is just a "non starter" as 'Vettes go. Only reason I'd take a 64 would be as a body to build a Pro-touring car... So if that's your plan then the 64 would be the right car to do that with. Not trying to be mean spirited or anything here - just being honest. The '64 is the step child year - no split window - no big block - no disc brakes all around - no special racing credits - no ZO6 big tankers etc... it's just kind of a "year" without anything really going for it. The '65 saw some high horse small blocks and the first big blocks... the '63 had the split window and was the first of that body style... thus the '64 just is kind of stuck in between.

The only reason I'm saying this - or even bothering to have an opinion on your trade - is just so you know what you're 'getting'.

Good luck with which ever way you choose!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-10-2010, 09:00 PM
1960LesPaul's Avatar
1960LesPaul 1960LesPaul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 72
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I appreciate your honesty. That is the kid of info I need to hear along with the potential problem areas. I am quickly thinking this isn't such a cool deal anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-10-2010, 09:02 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

Last thoughts -- just for fun - I checked on the inventory at Pro Team Corvette --- they have several 63's --- and several 65's -- a bunch of 66's and 67's... and they have -- ONE '64....

There's a reason for that -- and that is because they're hard to sell... and when they do - they don't bring much money.

Again - not raggin' on the car or anything - just being factual.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-10-2010, 09:41 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

A running car for a project, No thanks.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-11-2010, 02:38 AM
Tiger's Avatar
Tiger Tiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Italy
Posts: 125
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Is buying it and keeping the Chevelle a possibility? If you can get it for good money it would turn into a supernice protouring car :o)

think C6 suspension and ZR-1 engine :o)
__________________
André

2009 Chrysler 300C Touring.
3.0 liter V6 diesel, five speed auto.

1968 Chevelle Coupe.
355cid, Viper T56, Corvette C4 IRS (Dana 44) and C4 IFS. Porsche 6 and 4 piston Brembo's.

1980 Chevy Van (shortie G10).
355cid, TH350, 8.5" 10bolt posi and Belltech spindles.

*NOW PARTING OUT* 2000 BMW 540i Wagon*

Bikes
1968 Benelli City Bike
1990 Yamaha RD 350
1990 Yamaha TZR 125R
1991 Yamaha TZR 125R - RD350 engine, Aprilia RSV forks, RS250 wheels and shock
2010 Buell XB12SS
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-11-2010, 06:49 AM
1960LesPaul's Avatar
1960LesPaul 1960LesPaul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 72
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Yes that is an option. But staring down the face of a full restoration when I have to do the same on my wife's 65 Mustang doesn't sound like fun anymore. I would need to get rid of my Chevelle for the space. I know the vette is cooler than the Mustang but it is the wife and that trumps everything lol!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-11-2010, 08:10 AM
93Polo 93Polo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have often thought about doing a '64 for many of the reasons listed as to why many do not a '64. If the car is non #s matching, due a full Vettebrakes suspension, 5spd, motor of choice etc and have a fun driver/pro-tourer that you are not concerned about rock chips and every # matching.

If you want to spend some real cash SRIII, Jamison, Newman, Streetrodgarage and others offer frames or modify the frame for C4 or C5 suspension. You can also get wide fenders that keep the factory lines 67Heaven had them on his. He posted on Corvetteactioncenter and digitalcorvettes.
__________________
Lamar
69 Camaro RS traded
70 Chevelle SS 396
93 PoloGreen C4 LT1/ZF6 gone
00 FRC C5 436rwhp/415rwtq ported 5.3 heads/cam, MovIt Brembo Big Reds, 04 Z06 suspension
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-11-2010, 12:21 PM
buickfunnycar.com's Avatar
buickfunnycar.com buickfunnycar.com is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Monterey Peninsula,CA
Posts: 2,272
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhutton View Post
The 64 is the least desirable year of the C2's...
..and '72 is the least desirable of the 1970-72 models so it looks like a push to me.

I'd trade in a minute...bigger upside in the Corvette.
__________________
'67 Buick Skylark GS400 Funny Car "Ingenue"...World's only Buick-powered Buick Funny Car/Aug '10 Hot Rod featured car
World's only Buick-powered Buick Funny Car!

www.buickfunnycar.com
http://www.facebook.com/ingenuebuickfunnycar
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-11-2010, 01:59 PM
SLO 65 SLO 65 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 69
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Corvette vs. Chevelle

In my opinion you really need to establish a value for your Chevelle before considering a trade. I have absolutely no idea what a 1972 Chevelle is worth or how much time, labor, and money you have invested. The status of a 1964 vs. the other four years has been established, however, finding any "midyear" corvette for less than 15K is near impossible. Next, you should decide what you want this Corvette to be. If you want it to handle as well as a new Corvette and using an aftermarket frame plan on spending a minimum of 10K for an aftermarket frame, add wheels and tires, motor and transmission, cooling, etc. - It's going to cost a lot. Also, consider the loss of the back seat, assuming you have one. My Corvette is rendered useless as far as talking my wife and kids anywhere.

Nick
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-12-2010, 07:43 AM
1960LesPaul's Avatar
1960LesPaul 1960LesPaul is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 72
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by musclecarjohn View Post
..and '72 is the least desirable of the 1970-72 models so it looks like a push to me.

I'd trade in a minute...bigger upside in the Corvette.

Thats true John but unlike the 64 Vette, the 72 Chevelle is a very close 2nd to a 69 for what I consider my favorites. Now I really like all Vettes but the C2 version would not be in the top two. And as SLO suggests I am not so sure I want to put that much money into it. I am still going to go look at it but from what I am hearing now it's going to need alot more restoration than I was first told. Add on that the values of the 64 don't keep up is souring me on the deal. I am only upgrading brakes, front suspension away from being done on this car and it has had a ton of work done on it. I am sure I am upside down on the car but I had a vision for it and it's almost there. I sat in the garage last night looking at it and was wondering what the hell was I thnking lol. I do tend to get board a bit and initially wanted to trade it for a standard c6 or a really nice c5. Had my eye on a yellow 03 Z06.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net