...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-22-2012, 08:31 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dj3 View Post
Asking the question here is like walking into a bar and asking drunks if you should have a drink.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-22-2012, 08:39 PM
Jano4's Avatar
Jano4 Jano4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 68
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

It will look great either way. Personally though, I am all for PT.
__________________
2000 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-22-2012, 09:17 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,608
Thanks: 1,707
Thanked 906 Times in 675 Posts
Default

I say build it to drive. You may not need or want to go all out with all the changes many of us are or will be making to our cars, but for everyone's sake, do not make it a trailer queen that never gets driven. Yeah, Mopars are in short supply compared to other brands but they have enough factory restos and show cars. Make it enjoyable to drive for you. That is after all why the car was designed in the first place. 40 years of innovation just offers a better driving experience.


On a personal note, I love everything about the AAR and T/A cars. I think a car with all the proper markings on the outside but with updated suspension, brakes, and drive train would be stellar. If money allows, I'd with a go fuel injected solid lifter small block backed by a six speed trans. I think that would be the ticket to having a great looking and running car that would be a pleasure to drive. It would be a modern AAR-T/A car.

Good luck with whatever you decide.
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2001 BMW 540iT soon to be manual swapped and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims

00 BMW 540i/6: Suspension, wheels, and ACS bits.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-22-2012, 09:45 PM
robin93784 robin93784 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 73
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Challanger

Thank-you For All The Insight I Am Thinking Mild Pro-tour Look With Late Model Fuel Injected 5.7 Or 6.1 Motor And Tranny Not To Crazy But A Nice Looking And Good To Drive Car, What Makes It So Hard Is The Car Has Been Restored So Nice Making It All Orig. Is Just A Matter Of Finding A Few More Orig Parts.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-22-2012, 11:32 PM
John510's Avatar
John510 John510 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 1,345
Thanks: 1
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Go Pro Tour!

Put a new SRT8 in that beeeeatch!
__________________
68 Camaro "Bloodline". OZMO Twin DBW LS3 with TSP 231/236 cam, Speedtech frame, Ridetech coilovers, Chassisworks G Billet/Fab 9, Asanti 19's, Fesler brakes, Carbon Anvil everything, etc.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

65 Fastback "Maddo" @ Meanstreets Performance. Ridetech, crate 306/T5, tubbed, Forgeline

Last edited by John510; 03-22-2012 at 11:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-23-2012, 12:12 AM
frankv11's Avatar
frankv11 frankv11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: socal
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
Default

If there is not anything really special about that car that makes it really valuable stock. Definitely go PT , I restored my 64 Chevelle not to stock but mild pt and wished I would have gone full pro touring, because I just can't enjoy it as I wish. I'll take out for a full day and I'm not crazy about driving it for a while. So that's why I'm building 69 camaro now. So save time and money GO PT sooner the better
You just can't beat 40 or 50 years of technology.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-23-2012, 07:43 AM
ChevelleNV's Avatar
ChevelleNV ChevelleNV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John510 View Post
Go Pro Tour!

Put a new SRT8 in that beeeeatch!
I agree...
__________________
Greg R.
LSX Concepts
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-23-2012, 03:07 PM
SBDave SBDave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 6 Posts
Default

You can go mild PT so it can be converted back... that's what I'm doing with my 73 cuda. My car however is one of the least sought after e-body's and it's a beater.
-Dave
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-23-2012, 04:57 PM
76orangewagon's Avatar
76orangewagon 76orangewagon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 188
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

With todays advances in bolt in modifications you can always easily upgrade front/rear suspension without major surgery. Everything else is definatley reversible. The car looks great as is, but upgrades are the way to go.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-31-2012, 03:25 AM
67XR7's Avatar
67XR7 67XR7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sf, Bay Area
Posts: 394
Thanks: 5
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 76orangewagon View Post
With todays advances in bolt in modifications you can always easily upgrade front/rear suspension without major surgery. Everything else is definatley reversible. The car looks great as is, but upgrades are the way to go.
__________________
1965 Chevelle, Pm me if interested in wheel tool rental
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net