...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Chassis and Suspension
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-18-2014, 12:36 PM
Sieg's Avatar
Sieg Sieg is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Pacific Northwet
Posts: 8,034
Thanks: 33
Thanked 101 Times in 41 Posts
Default

^^^Agree. The spring rates don't seem aggressive at all, the unknown is the shock valving and without dynoing them it is blackmagic. That said, Ride Tech's shock offerings are one of the best reasonably priced pro-touring oriented shocks on the market.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-18-2014, 02:30 PM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the suggestions.

I've got a nitrogen fill setup on the way. When it gets here, I'll get a bottle from the welding gas store and gas up the rear shocks.

I also heard from David Pozzi who's tuned Bad Penny, which has the same front and rear suspensions I'm using, as well as the One Lap Camaro, which uses the same rear suspension.

David's suggesting I leave the rear spring rates alone for now and drop the front springs to 350 lb./in. He noted that 350 lb./in. springs in the 21st Century Street Machine subframe would be equivalent to a 600 lb./in. spring in a stock subframe, which suggests that the 450 lb./in. springs in there now are the equivalent of a 770 lb./in. spring in a stock subframe. In any event, I'll swap out the front springs, leave the rear alone (other than gassing up the shocks) and see where I am.

I'll consider shocks if I can't get it where I want it any other way, but springs are about $70 a set, and gas charged shocks (which I need because they're mounted upside down) are going to be $400-$1,000 plus a set.
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-18-2014, 03:46 PM
GregWeld's Avatar
GregWeld GregWeld is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AriDzona
Posts: 20,741
Thanks: 504
Thanked 1,080 Times in 388 Posts
Default

FWIW -- I had QA1's on my Nomad --- and switched them out to Strange... which is what Art Morrison uses and sells on his chassis... it was like I built a completely different car... Until then - I had no idea a shock (really a damper) could make that much difference!


The Nomad ran coil overs all the way around.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-18-2014, 03:50 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

Interesting...
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-18-2014, 05:15 PM
Mkelcy's Avatar
Mkelcy Mkelcy is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Walla Walla, WA
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregWeld View Post
FWIW -- I had QA1's on my Nomad --- and switched them out to Strange... which is what Art Morrison uses and sells on his chassis... it was like I built a completely different car... Until then - I had no idea a shock (really a damper) could make that much difference!


The Nomad ran coil overs all the way around.
That's good to know on the QA1's. They were a set I had laying around, so it's not a big deal to replace them.

My first impression when I drove the car was the front was over sprung, over damped or both. I dialed down the shocks, which improved it a bit, but it still felt over sprung (or maybe badly damped with some stiction). I'll swap the springs, and then see where I need to go next.

It may be that the back end will be just fine once I get the front sorted out.
__________________
Mike - '68 Camaro with some stuff done to it
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-19-2014, 08:03 AM
Matt@BOS's Avatar
Matt@BOS Matt@BOS is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,042
Thanks: 2
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mkelcy View Post
Thanks for the suggestions.

I've got a nitrogen fill setup on the way. When it gets here, I'll get a bottle from the welding gas store and gas up the rear shocks.

I also heard from David Pozzi who's tuned Bad Penny, which has the same front and rear suspensions I'm using, as well as the One Lap Camaro, which uses the same rear suspension.

David's suggesting I leave the rear spring rates alone for now and drop the front springs to 350 lb./in. He noted that 350 lb./in. springs in the 21st Century Street Machine subframe would be equivalent to a 600 lb./in. spring in a stock subframe, which suggests that the 450 lb./in. springs in there now are the equivalent of a 770 lb./in. spring in a stock subframe. In any event, I'll swap out the front springs, leave the rear alone (other than gassing up the shocks) and see where I am.

I'll consider shocks if I can't get it where I want it any other way, but springs are about $70 a set, and gas charged shocks (which I need because they're mounted upside down) are going to be $400-$1,000 plus a set.
Don't forget though, while you found the relative difference between the spring rate on a stock subframe vs the 21st Century one, you've sort of calculated one back from the other without thinking about the motion ratio and wheel rate. The 450lb spring might be equivalent to 770lb spring in a stock subframe car, but wheel rates are probably closer to 300 and 200. If you had a 550-700 lb spring on the 21st Century frame I would think it would be way too much for what you're doing.

Part of building a car is spending time after its done to get it sorted out to your liking. Even the finished cars around here always seem to be in pieces. Springs are cheaper than shocks though, so if it works for you then you're lucky you only had to make one change.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-19-2014, 11:06 AM
David Pozzi's Avatar
David Pozzi David Pozzi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 575
Thanks: 2
Thanked 58 Times in 20 Posts
Default

I Found my notes.
coil rates are rounded off.

A 300 coil on a 21st century sub has a wheel rate of 156.
A 350 coil = 182
A 400 coil = 208
A 450 coil = 234

A 650 coil on a stock sub has a wheel rate of 156.
A 750 coil = 182
A 850 coil = 208
A 950 coil = 234
You will notice a 50 lb increase in 21st centruy sub = a 100 lb increase in the stock sub.

On a 21'st Century sub, multiply coil rate by .521 = Wheel Rate

Bad Penny started out at 350 went to 450 to 475 for quite a while and I think may have ended up around 500-550.
Steve always wanted to run the car super low, so we had somewhat limited bump travel. We had to go stiffer to make it work. With a higher ride height and more travel, you can run a softer spring. Shocks have a huge influence in this too.
Attached Images
 
__________________
http://www.PozziRacing.com

Last edited by David Pozzi; 05-20-2014 at 04:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-21-2014, 06:59 AM
Payton King's Avatar
Payton King Payton King is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 2,576
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
Default

I had the 21st Centry subframe and a Torque arm rear with no bar. I ran 550 lbs front and 325 rear with Bilstein shocks and 1.25 bar .188 wall in 34 inch length. 13 inch sway bar arms netted a rate of 364 lbs.

As stated above, the quality shocks valved correctly, made all of the difference in the world.

I started off with cheap non-adjustible shocks and 350 f and 175 rear with 1 inch solid bar. Quickly went to 450 f and 250 rear. Best ride was above with the best performance. Car rode way better than my wife's M3 she had at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-21-2014, 07:25 AM
bret's Avatar
bret bret is offline
Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default

You can guess...you can solicit advice from those who have a similar set up...or you can spend a small amount of time and really calculate what spring the car needs: http://www.ridetech.com/tech/spring-rate-calculator/

This calculator will work for any brand of coilspring or coilover. I'll spare you my personal and shameless recommendation of the RideTech shocks
__________________
Bret Voelkel
President
RideTech
Air Ride Technologies, Inc.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bret For This Useful Post:
orangevert (04-01-2019)
  #20  
Old 05-21-2014, 08:15 AM
Rod P's Avatar
Rod P Rod P is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Thompsons Station, TN
Posts: 977
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt.A View Post
the fastest way to get your car driving down the road with the ride you are looking for would be to call RideTech up and get a set of their shocks. Their Ride Quality and Handling Quality series of shocks (hope I got those names right) flat out work the way they should. The cars I've driven with them ride so well I don't even think about the suspension. The ride is smooth, solid and pretty composed without clunking over bumps.

Bret/Rod please don't ever let that end up as a testimonial on your website, accompanied by that picture of my car under the Fox awning at Laguna Seca. I will get in trouble.

Matt
Oh no...I would never do that........ ....but its gonna cost ya!
__________________
Rod Prouty
My websiteAuto-cross 101
I'm not a Real Racer but I did spend a night in the Pozzi's motor-home
Bangshift Stories
I’m not the smartest guy at the track … but when he goes home … I’m still there testing, tuning, learning & getting faster.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net