...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-03-2006, 12:43 PM
slow4dr's Avatar
slow4dr slow4dr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 556
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default



__________________
'04 IS300 LS3/TR6060 swap in process
'89 Plymouth Colt GT - 411WHP, 2490lbs & 32mpg
'06 Magnum SRT8 - AFE S2, 3" Flowmaster catback, Diablo Predator (KIA by a drunk driver 10-25-13)
63 Nova 'Low Budget G-Machine' *SOLD*
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-03-2006, 01:05 PM
T Bell T Bell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

what kind of numbers?
__________________
1972 Nova 355, 4 spd, rusty but something to drive.
1972 Pro-touring Cutlass S in the works....still
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-03-2006, 01:16 PM
slow4dr's Avatar
slow4dr slow4dr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 556
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T Bell
what kind of numbers?

I want about 600WHP with whatever engine I decide on. On the other hand I can be around 550WHP with the Ecotec and achieve the same speeds.

With an LSx I can get 600WHP on pump and low boost, where as the Ecotec is going to take race gas and 30 psi to make 500+.


With the Ecotec I should be able to get the car with driver around 2500 lbs.
__________________
'04 IS300 LS3/TR6060 swap in process
'89 Plymouth Colt GT - 411WHP, 2490lbs & 32mpg
'06 Magnum SRT8 - AFE S2, 3" Flowmaster catback, Diablo Predator (KIA by a drunk driver 10-25-13)
63 Nova 'Low Budget G-Machine' *SOLD*
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-03-2006, 01:45 PM
Rick D's Avatar
Rick D Rick D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Third Rock From the Sun!! 😃
Posts: 3,437
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I was talking with someone the other day about using the inline 6 from a Trailblazer with a Turbo but I sill think the LS1 looks cooler
__________________
Rick

[SIGPIC]https://neversaynever0304.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/you-didnt-see-anything.gif[/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-03-2006, 09:10 PM
McssGmachine's Avatar
McssGmachine McssGmachine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arlington ,TX
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I was going to say a Twin turbo diesel!
__________________
BRIAN WEST
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-04-2006, 08:45 AM
Mean 69 Mean 69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 375
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I think this is a terrific idea, the motor no doubt is going to be hyper with all of the at boost, but I expect the hobby at least in part, to go this direction in the future. J's blazing somewhat of a trail here, and he's smart to realize that weight is the enemy, anything you can do within reason to reduce it is a good thing, it makes EVERYTHING else easier: acceleration, cornering forces, braking, durability concerns, you name it.

That little car is going to whoop some a$$.
M
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net