...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Open Discussion
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-03-2006, 10:18 PM
ScotI ScotI is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 693
Thanks: 78
Thanked 227 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Howell
I went with a TTll, 17x7 with 4 3/4 bs. HOWEVER, TTlls are odd wheels and require a 1/4" spacer to work with the C-5 set up so really a 4 1/2 bs would have worked with any other wheel.
I was under the impression that the ATS spindle on a G-body would only allow 3.5" BS'ing (that's the info I got when I inquired about them). They said any more BS'ing & the steering arm would interfere w/the wheel lip on the inside.

Hhmmm . . .....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-03-2006, 11:54 PM
Derek69SS's Avatar
Derek69SS Derek69SS is offline
Supporting Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dexter, MN
Posts: 963
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitrorocket
I have had my body off twice and I can not think off any more issues. I figure I have to re-align the body any way when I do the cage, I might as well try, I will see how it goes. I would think 1800 lbs would surely make some difference another 1/2" lower, especialy on the track. Anybody with software to figure this out?
I put some serious thought into this too, and also decided not to do it. My main reason was that I would have to fab up new front inner fenders or run without them to have any gain. The front-tire to inner-fender clearance is the limiting factor for getting the maximum drop from the car, so in reality, with stock inners, and running as low as you can go, rather than dropping the body 1/2" you would just effectively be raising the chassis 1/2". This would be nice for gaining a little ground-clearance, but you would be moving weight higher, rather than lower... of course, custom inner fenders would solve that problem, and allow you to take advantage of the body-drop.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-04-2006, 01:24 PM
Bill Howell Bill Howell is offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pigeon Forge, Tn.
Posts: 967
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotI
I was under the impression that the ATS spindle on a G-body would only allow 3.5" BS'ing (that's the info I got when I inquired about them). They said any more BS'ing & the steering arm would interfere w/the wheel lip on the inside.

Hhmmm . . .....
The wheels I have on it right now (corvette wheels) do hit the tie rod. I will have you an answer tonight about the new ones. It will be close, but I think we are ok.
__________________
Bill Howell
www.americanstreetcarseries.com
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-04-2006, 02:44 PM
ScotI ScotI is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 693
Thanks: 78
Thanked 227 Times in 156 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Howell
The wheels I have on it right now (corvette wheels) do hit the tie rod. I will have you an answer tonight about the new ones. It will be close, but I think we are ok.
Please post your findings when you get the chance.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-04-2006, 07:06 PM
Bill Howell Bill Howell is offline
Site Sponsor
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pigeon Forge, Tn.
Posts: 967
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Unless I am really missing something, I will have plenty of clearance with the 4 3/4 b.s. I put the TTlls back on that are 4" bs and there is plenty of room, plenty. There will be absolutely no issue with the steering arms and clearance.
The other 3/4 will not be a factor.
__________________
Bill Howell
www.americanstreetcarseries.com
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-06-2006, 07:32 PM
USAZR1's Avatar
USAZR1 USAZR1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 273
Thanks: 20
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek69SS
I put some serious thought into this too, and also decided not to do it. My main reason was that I would have to fab up new front inner fenders or run without them to have any gain. The front-tire to inner-fender clearance is the limiting factor for getting the maximum drop from the car, so in reality, with stock inners, and running as low as you can go, rather than dropping the body 1/2" you would just effectively be raising the chassis 1/2". This would be nice for gaining a little ground-clearance, but you would be moving weight higher, rather than lower... of course, custom inner fenders would solve that problem, and allow you to take advantage of the body-drop.
Just how low do you want to go,guys? My El Camino is definitely lower than both your cars and if I had my 17x9 fronts re-backspaced from 5" to 5.5",I could probably take the car down another 1/2" to 1",with ease.
And,my car still has the inner fenders.
__________________
Clint Hooper
Clint's 70 El Camino restomod Sold
Clint's 69 Elky Protourer Sold
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net