...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Engine
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-17-2007, 04:36 PM
rocketman's Avatar
rocketman rocketman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: mo
Posts: 718
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Brodix or AFR's are the best heads period IMO,The only Dart head I use is Big Chiefs on mountian motor stuff,Even the I like Big Duke's better depends on app.

Last edited by rocketman; 06-30-2007 at 07:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-21-2007, 02:42 PM
Scotch Scotch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 171
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PTAddict
Port size can't really be directly compared between 1st gen and LSx motors - port length, port height, valve size, and valve angle differences make the comparison not really useful.

235 CC would generally be considered quite large for a 434 street motor, unless you're going for higher RPM power peak (6500 - 7000). Even then, many engine builders will take the philosophy of using smaller ports. John Lingenfelter used to build 420 CID small blocks with heads in the 190 cc range, shooting for brutal torque and 550 HP or so.

If it was my motor, I'd think about the newest version of AFR 210s or 220s as a starting point. Call Tony Mamo over at AFR and tell him in detail what your goals are - he'll be able to make a recommendation on both heads and cam. I've used 3 sets of AFRs on different builds now, always with excellent results, and AFR's customer service has always been great for me.

I was just gonna write the exact same things, start to finish .

Well done. You actually know stuff.

~Scotch~
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-27-2007, 09:01 PM
Smittys67's Avatar
Smittys67 Smittys67 is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Vendor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tiffin Oh
Posts: 142
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I dont think you can get a head to big for a 434. I have 2 of them with dart 230 ported to the max and there is no hesitaton on the bottom end of them. On the dyno they make 472 ft lbs at 3500 507 at 400 575 at 5000 hp was 635 at 6500. The dyno pulls were not to make peek hp we were messing with lifters and oiling problems.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-30-2007, 07:12 PM
rocketman's Avatar
rocketman rocketman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: mo
Posts: 718
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

It's a 434 it will love bigger heads.I have a customer with a 434 on the street with 245's there Brodix heads.It run's awesome
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-15-2007, 04:19 PM
bluaddict bluaddict is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: spanaway,washington
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 235 cc Head for my motor

I have a 6/71 blown SBC bored .40 over and a 3.85 crank and the heads I have are ported out to the max. I runs like a wild raped ape when I put my foot thru the floor and I believe it still wants to breath more deeply, yea ! I already have Iron eagle 230 with 2.08 and 1.625's and Super Comp Headers 1 7/8 also it ts a tall port Truck motor I was told as I had to have the ports enlarged on my intake to fit ( to short ) along with port matching. I am going to be running a Methenol Injection Intercooler setup soon in my 1978 Z28 Camaro. I also have a Turbo 400 and a set of 3.90 gears as I am in the middle of a teardown on it to add beehive springs, etc. What Do Ya Tink, Claude.
__________________
bluaddict
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net