Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody
Greg,
You have mentioned in a couple of your posts that you believe Apple is priced for perfection. A few of questions.
Does that mean you think it is currently over-valued?
Would you buy it now if you did not own it already?
Can you take us through your thought process in determining why it is priced for perfection.
You mentioned that the PE is roughly 14 and the overall market PE is about 15. Would that not indicate it is slightly undervalued or am I misinterpreting the use of the PE.
Thanks
|
Good question -- and buy the way (pun intended) -- I'm not trying to be or going to be the threads "stock guru" -- but the question is put in a fashion that is the correct (IMHO) way so that we can discuss what something means. We'll use this particular stock - but it's not a recommendation - rather - it's a discussion of thought process to be applied to ANY stock.
The statement "priced to perfection" is not a PREDICTOR of price - nor does it set the current price of a stock (in my mind)... what it does say to me is this:
IF ANYTHING HAPPENS - a "sales miss" - a "product slip up" - a "profit decline" etc -- THE STOCK GETS HAMMERED.
I would buy APPLE on a price decline -- why? Because I think there is a huge shift to their products and the way they work. They're the market makers, not the market followers - and I like that in a company - ESPECIALLY in TECH. Apply that thought to any company -- are they the "best of breed" or are they "me too's"? I like best of breed.
So the statement priced to perfection is just generally used as a "buyer be ware" statement - that the MOMENTUM in a stock is based on everything CONTINUING to go their way. The EXPECTATIONS are very high and the company MUST perform at 100% or even better.
NO I DO NOT THINK IT IS OVERVALUED -- If I did - I'd be a seller... rather than a "holder" -- BUT -- I have taken my profits on this company and am mostly holding free money in the name. When someone buys today - they're betting the stock can and will rise from here. That's a question NOBODY can answer. My GUESS is that they can...
OKAY ---- INVESTING 102 will give you this THOUGHT PROCESS.
One share of a stock trading at 4 or 500 dollars per share and no dividend.
How many shares can you buy? 10? 20? 30?
So let's use the 30 share number. If the stock goes up 10% and it's $400 a share - you have a $40 per share gain - X's 30 ='s $1200 paper gain.
REALLY? 12 GRAND invested to MAYBE make 1200?
So the same 12 Grand invested in Annaly Capital Management (NLY) just to use ONE EXAMPLE ONLY -- would buy you 700 shares (@ $17 a share) and pays you .57 per share - per quarter - or - DRUM ROLL -- $1600 a year!
So that's the problem -- IF -- big if -- you're a beginning investor - and prefer NOT to gamble on pure capital gains - but would prefer to plod ahead... Personally -- I do "both" -- but it depends on your risk tolerance and how much you have to invest etc.
Now -- if you have 12 grand to invest in one stock - that should be only 5% of the total you have to invest - so you should have around 200 grand. At that amount - I think it's probably "okay" to have one stock like this in your portfolio. But if you only have 50 grand to play with... this is pretty "rich".