...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Lateral-G Open Discussions > Project Updates
User Name
Password



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-01-2009, 09:05 PM
notorious1970's Avatar
notorious1970 notorious1970 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: here
Posts: 354
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Looking great so far!
__________________
RadRides '70 Nova Notorious
Build thread
https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=8840
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-02-2009, 03:37 PM
WSSix WSSix is offline
Lateral-g Supporting Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 6,559
Thanks: 1,471
Thanked 833 Times in 629 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tig Man View Post
It's a rubber biscut setup from Howe! Used them a long time ago on cup and busch cars before they outlawed them.


Mark

Why were they outlawed? I'm guessing not a safety issue. Just curious.

You're doing great work Mark. I still love your 2nd gen.
__________________
Trey

Current rides: 2000 BMW 540i/6 and 86 C10.

Former ride: 1979 Trans Am WS6: LT1/T56, Kore 3 C5/6 brakes, BMW 18in rims
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-02-2009, 03:46 PM
Tig Man Tig Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Big Stone Gap, Virginia
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default outlawed 3link

I think Nascar wanted all the car to be the same so they didn't have to try to police serveral different setups. It has gotten worse through th eyears. Hence the COT! Like the IROC series. Same cars different drivers
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-03-2009, 06:48 PM
camaro41701 camaro41701 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

pics of underslung frame brace and shock mounts.Car will not have a rollcage.
Attached Images
    
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-03-2009, 09:56 PM
Kendall Burleson Kendall Burleson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Antonio,Texas
Posts: 696
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

will the lower brace be square tube or round tube.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-03-2009, 10:20 PM
camaro41701 camaro41701 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Square,2 inch I think.He mentioned running the track bar off of it.Should have pics of the frame and maybe track bar tom. evening.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-04-2009, 01:05 AM
gracin7's Avatar
gracin7 gracin7 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Looks good,I run that 3rd link biscuit in my race truck,have you mocked up a trunk floor and a back seat,the rear kickups look awfully tall and long,you also seem to have a backround in stockcar fab?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-04-2009, 07:07 AM
camaro41701 camaro41701 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

We are going to put bucket seats in the back similar to the new GTO.The upholstery guy said something about 4 flow fits.
Mark has been in the fabrication end of stock-car racing for many years.He has worked for chassis shops and Winston Cup teams.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-04-2009, 09:03 AM
ccracin's Avatar
ccracin ccracin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rostraver, PA
Posts: 2,077
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro41701 View Post
pics of underslung frame brace and shock mounts.Car will not have a rollcage.
This works well on stock cars because of the cage and overall chassis configurations. The main structure of most stock car chassis' create a kind of truss effect. In this application the underslung stiffeners will mostly just add weight. They won't do much to stiffen the chassis. The rear clip including those stiffeners still welds on at the rear cross member. This is the point that the moment created by the rear suspension is going to act on. If you would have used smaller rail members on the upper rails, this may have provided more benefit. I just don't think you are going to have much deflection in the joints of your main rails. This is just my opinion. The chassis is looking great you guys do nice work. By the way this underslung deal makes getting the rear out without scratching stuff a real pain. LOL Been there. Keep up the great work.
__________________
Chad
Instagram - @cctek
https://https://www.facebook.com/CCTek

68 Chevy Pickup Project
Build Thread: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=7505

THANKS TO: A&M Machine and Fabrication, CCTek (http://www.candctek.com), Hermance Design(www.hermancedesign.com), Paradise Road Rod & Custom, Harry Opfer Welding, Wegner Automotive Research, Clayton Machine Works
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-04-2009, 02:27 PM
gracin7's Avatar
gracin7 gracin7 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Long Island,NY
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I built a couple of rear clips for for racecars including my own with underslung rails,made them out of 1x2" and attach to the x-member inboard about 12" wide and go back on an angle to meet the frame rail drops 36" wide and back as far as the bumper,this would create a better triangulation and be more effective in this application,I was gonna put it in my 66 Chevelle project cause I to am not going to put a cage in it also, but Im on the fence .In the racecars I mount the fuelcell and lead ballast on these rails,my 2 cents,Rich
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net