...

Go Back   Lateral-g Forums > Technical Discussions > Transmission and Rear End
User Name
Password



View Poll Results: AL or Steel flywheel
AL 19 46.34%
Steel 22 53.66%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-12-2013, 04:57 PM
randy randy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,041
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake Foster View Post
My Nova has an Aluminum McLoed flywheel and an RST clutch. and i drive it on the street!! no issues, it did take a while to get to the point of not stalling it every time i let the clutch out, and the smell of the organic clutch is not that plesent. but it sure revs fast!!! there is some trade off but i would never put a steel fw in a car that is going on the track, trust me you get used to it in a hurry.

Greg you can't beleve everything you read on the internet you know!!
" You cant post anything on the internet thats not true"


" where did you hear that"

" on the internet"
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-15-2013, 05:25 PM
sik68's Avatar
sik68 sik68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 505
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Aluminum flywheel is the best thing about my car! Makes it feel way faster and sound way meaner than it really is. The whole car just gets more visceral in the lower gears.

I start off in 2nd gear (1.98*3.73 = 7.39) all the time no issues, just a little more finesse is needed I suppose.

Another benefit...in a (God forbid) kaboom in a bellhousing, a 15lb aluminum flywheel is much safer than a 30+ lb steel one.
__________________
Steven

1968 Camaro: "TRACKDAY"

Build In Progress: https://lateral-g.net/forums/showthread.php4?t=10706

Last edited by sik68; 03-15-2013 at 05:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-15-2013, 10:31 PM
Vegas69's Avatar
Vegas69 Vegas69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,692
Thanks: 87
Thanked 215 Times in 120 Posts
Default

I put one behind my 666hp ZL-1 489 and enjoyed it thoroughly. Mine was 14 lbs. I could take off without even blipping the throttle. It just ate it up. It revved like a short stroke small block all the way to 6800. It made rev matching way easier.

The compromise, because there are always compromises: It made my tko600 even harder to shift. It would also start to buck 200-300 rpm sooner in a tall gear for the speed.

I'd do it again except behind a t56 and rev it to 7200.
__________________
Todd
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-22-2013, 04:43 PM
garickman garickman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,034
Thanks: 62
Thanked 335 Times in 130 Posts
Default

There is some pretty cool info in this article about the effects of aluminum vs. steel flywheel. Kind of long but worth the read

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/fea...e/viewall.html
__________________
Greg
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-26-2013, 12:11 AM
DaleTx's Avatar
DaleTx DaleTx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 486
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Good information in that article .... I am running a 12 lb aluminum flywheel on my 427" LS engine. It does take just a bit more RPM when starting out but barely noticeable.... still very easy to drive on the street in traffic. I like the way the engine responds and feels with the lighter aluminum flywheel.
__________________
"If you wait, all that happens is you get older"
Mario Andretti

69 Camaro-Nutter Racing Engines/427CI LS2 sleeved/LS7 CNC ported heads/Custom cam/T&D 1.8 rockers/Manley crank/Manley H-beam rods/Weisco pistons/NRC Pro Series dry sump/Kooks/NA,92 octane,11.5:1- 672HP @ 6,900RPM, 566TQ @ 5,500RPM
Build Thread- http://ls1tech.com/forums/generation...ine-build.html
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-26-2013, 01:35 AM
Flash68's Avatar
Flash68 Flash68 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NorCal
Posts: 9,180
Thanks: 58
Thanked 158 Times in 104 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sik68 View Post
=
Another benefit...in a (God forbid) kaboom in a bellhousing, a 15lb aluminum flywheel is much safer than a 30+ lb steel one.
I like that point. Makes me feel even mo betta about my 7#er.
__________________
2004 NASA AIX Mustang LS2 #14
1964 Lincoln Continental
2014 4 tap Keezer
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-28-2013, 01:27 PM
INTMD8's Avatar
INTMD8 INTMD8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 376
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 2 Posts
Default

Doesn't the reciprocating assembly in an FE weigh about as much as a complete SBC?

It will be fine with aluminum just slightly more throttle input when pulling off from a stop.

Make sure you get a good flywheel if you go with aluminum. I've been in some cars with cheapo budget alum flywheels and they would flex with RPM. (You could push the clutch to the floor while in gear and if you revved it over 6000rpm the car would lunge forward). Bolt the same clutch to a good flywheel (or steel) and the problem disappeared.
__________________
69 Charger. 438ci Gen2 hemi. Flex fuel. Holley HP efi. 650rwhp @7250 510rwtq @5700. 95 F355. 96 Carrera 4S. 59 Cadillac series 62 convertible.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Lateral-g.net